https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/issue/feed CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios 2021-05-05T12:10:11+01:00 Maria Assunção Gato cidades.dinamiacet@iscte-iul.pt Open Journal Systems <p><strong>CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios</strong> is a peer-reviewed, biannual, multidisciplinary journal in Urban Studies established in 2000 and published by DINÂMIA’CET-Iscte.</p> <p>The orientation of&nbsp;<strong>CIDADES&nbsp;</strong>is based on the plurality of theoretical perspectives and disciplinary approaches to the analysis of the city, as enshrined in the array of multidisciplinary scientific area of Urban Studies.&nbsp;<strong>CIDADES&nbsp;</strong>seeks further knowledge about urban problems and policies in order to intervene and, in general, concerning the processes of transformation of cities, communities and territories.</p> <div> <div>&nbsp;</div> <div><strong>Editor</strong></div> <div>Maria Assunção Gato, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</div> <div>&nbsp;</div> <div><strong>Deputy Editor</strong></div> <div>Ana Rita Cruz,&nbsp;DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</div> <div> <div>&nbsp;</div> <div><strong>Editorial Committee</strong></div> <div>Ana Rita Cruz,&nbsp;DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</div> <div>Ana Vaz Milheiro, FAUL, Portugal&nbsp;</div> <div>Madalena Matos, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</div> <div>Maria Assunção Gato, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</div> <div>Paula André,&nbsp;DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</div> <div>Pedro Costa, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</div> <div>Renato Carmo, CIES-IUL, Portugal</div> <div>Virgílio Borges Pereira, FLUP, Portugal</div> <div><strong><strong><strong><br>Editorial Advisory Board</strong> <br></strong></strong> <p>Alain Bourdin, University Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, France</p> <p>Álvaro Domingues, Faculdade de Arquitectura da Universidade do Porto, Portugal</p> <p>Carlos Fortuna, Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal</p> <p>Catherine Bonvalet, Institut National d'Études Démographiques, France</p> <p>Chris Hamnett, King's College London, United Kingdom</p> <p>Claire Lévy-Vroelant, Université Paris 8, France</p> <p>Domingos Martins Vaz, CESNOVA, Portugal</p> <p>Emílio Duhau, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Azcapotzalco, Mexico</p> <p>Isabel Guerra, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal</p> <p>Jerome Krase, Brooklyn College of CUNY, USA</p> <p>Jesus Leal Maldonado, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain</p> <p>João Ferrão, Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal</p> <p>João Seixas, CICS.NOVA, Portugal</p> <p>João Teixeira Lopes,&nbsp; Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Portugal</p> <p>José Machado Pais, Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal</p> <p>José Alberto Rio Fernandes, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Portugal</p> <p>Lidia K.C. Manzo, Maynooth University, Italy</p> <p>Lúcia Bogus, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Brazil</p> <p>Lucinda Fonseca, Centro de Estudos Geográficos da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal</p> <p>Luís Baptista, CICS.NOVA, Portugal</p> <p>Maria João Freitas, Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Portugal</p> <p>Oriol Nel.lo, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain</p> <p>Paula Guerra, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Portugal</p> <p>Paulo Peixoto, Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade do Porto, Portugal</p> <p>Roselyne De Villanova, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France</p> <p>Sandra Marques Pereira, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</p> <p>Suzana Pasternak, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil</p> <p>Teresa Costa Pinto, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</p> <p>Teresa Marat-Mendes, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</p> <p>Teresa Sá Marques, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Portugal</p> <p>Víctor Matias Ferreira, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</p> <p>Walter Rodrigues, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</p> <h4>Editorial Assistant &amp; Copy Editor</h4> <p>Mariana Leite Braga, DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, Portugal</p> </div> <div> <div>&nbsp;</div> </div> </div> </div> https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/21635 Building communal ties in the Arranjo Local da Penha 2021-05-05T12:10:11+01:00 Mariana Portilho mariana.portilho@gmail.com Camila Gonçalves de Oliveira Rodrigues camirural@gmail.com Annelise Caetano Fraga Fernandez annelisecff@yahoo.com.br <p>This paper studies the development of Arranjo Local da Penha, a territorial community network created in 2016 in the favelas of Penha, rooted in the north zone of Rio de Janeiro. This network is led mostly by women practicing urban agriculture based on agroecology, who build and expand their project through local organization. Through field research and participant observation, the paper sheds new light on the practices and dynamics of this network. The paper describes the Arranjo’s trajectory, pointing out the limits and possibilities to the development of urban agriculture in the favelas of Penha. Overall, my research indicates an increase in women’s protagonistic role, in parallel to the building of strong emotional ties between Penha´s territory and them. These are outcomes of their effort to create access to “<em>comida de verdade</em>” (“real food”) in the favelas. The paper reinforces the importance of local food production as a path to promote not only health and well-being, but also the debates about memory and culture - leading to the strengthening of people´s social ties and their sense of belonging to the community.</p> 2021-05-07T00:00:00+01:00 Copyright (c) 2021 Mariana Portilho, Camila Gonçalves de Oliveira Rodrigues, Annelise Caetano Fraga Fernandez https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/21820 New capital cities in the Global South 2021-03-29T11:30:12+01:00 Renato Leão Rego rlrego@uem.br <p>This paper contextualizes Abuja’s planning history (Nigeria, 1979-1981) and Palmas (Brazil, 1989), considering networks of knowledge, travelling ideas, and the planners’ tool-kit. It analyses these new capital cities’ layouts through a more global reading of planning history. It argues that their plans, created out of political and economic imperatives and entrusted with transformative expectations, did not abandon the hegemonic modernist models in post-modernist, post-colonial times, regardless of the planners’ backgrounds. Global ideas concealed cultural sensibilities in both cases as local and foreign professionals developed comparable planning proposals in equivalent responses to the international frameworks.</p> 2021-05-05T00:00:00+01:00 Copyright (c) 2021 Renato Leão Rego https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/21976 City, culture and urbanism 2021-02-23T16:22:21+00:00 Marcelo Tramontano tramont@sc.usp.br <p>This article examines the formulation, implementation, and reasons for suspending the Master Plan of the Historic Centre of Asuncion (PlanCHA), Paraguay. Instead of a traditional master plan, the winner proposal of the international competition organized by the country's National Government in 2014 is a master process composed of dozens of top-down and bottom-up participatory actions, articulated by ten initial strategies. The research carried out on PlanCHA is part of investigations ongoing at Nomads.usp, the Center for Interactive Living Studies of the Institute of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, on participatory decision-making processes in the context of urban interventions in several cities around the world. As in the case of Asuncion, we prioritize urban intervention plans that, in addition to face-to-face actions, include digital participation platforms. The research on PlanCHA aimed to understand the issues involved in the implementation of an action plan that included and depended totally on the participation of public managers, politicians, non-governmental organizations, universities, real estate agents, and traders for its success, in a capital city whose population has virtually no experience of participation in public decision-making processes. Finally, the article lists some hypotheses for the Plan's interruption, categorized for administrative, political, and socio-economic reasons. We interviewed the winning office team in Madrid and the partner team of Paraguayan architects who implemented the project locally. In Asuncion, we also met historians, members and former members of the National and Local governments, real estate agents, community representatives, cultural producers, residents, and academic researchers. We made several technical visits to the Asuncion Historic Centre and studied historical, urban, demographic, academic, and journalistic documents.</p> 2021-04-12T00:00:00+01:00 Copyright (c) 2021 Marcelo Tramontano https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/20612 Araguaína/TO: city and discourse in the Brazilian Amazon 2021-01-07T12:48:54+00:00 João de Deus Leite joaodedeus@uft.edu.br Miguel Pacifico Filho miguilim@uft.edu.br Maria Cilene Pires cilene.pires21@yahoo.com.br <p>This article aims at analyzing the “Espaço Cultural Agnaldo Borges Pinto”, located in Araguaína-Tocantins, founded on the concepts provided by Orlandi (1999) and Ultramari (2019). We assume that the construction of such a cultural space relates to the order of the “urban discourse”. That is to say that the urban discourse produces conflicts and a certain kind of urban “organization”. In order to achieve our aim, we take two institutional journals to construct our <em>corpus, </em>namely “Prestando contas a comunidade (2000), and Araguaína - História e atualidade (2000). They were both edited by the City Hall of Araguaína. In addition, data were also collected in local press between 2011 and 2020. By analyzing these records, the way this cultural space was meant was problematized. We especially highlighted how the circulation of meanings about “Espaço Cultural Agnaldo Borges Pinto” ocurred locally. Especifically, the analysis dealt with utterances found in the interviews extracted from the journals and from the sites visisted. Thus, we were able to map the designations and the process of adjectivation through which the construction of the space was textually and discursively signified. As a conequence, we were also able to reflect about the effects of this so called “order of urban discourse”, mainly to what concerns the category of “organization”. The idea of intra-urban space, as understood by Villaça (2001), allowed us to improve our analysis. Results have shown that there is an institutionalized discursivity in conflict. The construction and the conclusion of “Espaço Cultural Agnaldo Borges Pinto” is meant to be part of a bigger Project of constructing similar spaces, not only in Brazil but also in other parts of the world.</p> 2021-02-22T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2021 João de Deus Leite, Miguel Pacifico Filho, Maria Cilene Pires https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/20287 Community and Architecture Treble 2021-01-11T12:19:49+00:00 Oscar Eduardo Preciado Velásquez o.preciadovel@gmail.com <p>This research seeks to relate some of the processes that led to consider within the <em>Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne</em> the inclusion of the concept of community and the successive incorporation of the settlers to the architectural project, by showing a context of references, reverberations and interactions around the subject. A bibliographic review of primary and secondary sources that narrate those actions from the end of the 19<sup>th</sup> century was carried out, with the contribution of Patrick Geddes theories, which had a notable influence in Team X, leading to the end of CIAMs in the mid-20<sup>th</sup> century, and also to the anarchist architect John Turner, a key figure who researched pioneering experiences of popular housing in Peru and disseminated them in the Global North. The discussions that took place in the CIAMs questioned the absolute hierarchy of the professional <em>vis-à-vis</em> the communities, in which the notion of authorship of work is disregarded and is fully transferred to the users. Those pioneering experiences can be a call for attention to consider spaces not disputed by the real estate market as a part of architectural praxis, especially in Latin America. This involves a process of recognition and clash with the reality of most of the geographic space of our cities – unequal in essence – and eager for expeditious solutions to the great contradictions that prevail in our context.</p> 2021-03-25T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2021 Oscar Eduardo Preciado Velásquez https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/20940 The Paintings on Mies Van der Rohe’ Collages 2020-12-16T14:26:58+00:00 Daniel Cunha Gomes dcgsa@iscte-iul.pt Mariana Branco Amante Macedo Veríssimo mbamv@iscte-iul.pt Alexandra Moreno Vaz Casimiro amvco@iscte-iul.pt Carlota Lourenço Figueira Matos Morais clfmm@iscte.pt <p>A lot has been written about the architectural production of Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, German architect naturalized American that built some of the most relevant pieces of architecture of the XX century. Mies produced an extensive amount of collages, today archived in the MoMA - Museum of Modern Art in New York, that unveil an accurate aesthetic of architectural representation. The principal investigation about this set of collages of Mies can be found in the book <em>Montage Collage</em> of Andreas F. Beitin, Wolf <a href="https://www.amazon.com/-/pt/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_2?ie=UTF8&amp;field-author=Wolf+Eiermann&amp;text=Wolf+Eiermann&amp;sort=relevancerank&amp;search-alias=books">Eiermann</a> e <a href="https://www.amazon.com/-/pt/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_3?ie=UTF8&amp;field-author=Brigitte+Franzen&amp;text=Brigitte+Franzen&amp;sort=relevancerank&amp;search-alias=books">Brigitte Franzen</a>, that constituted the catalog of the exhibition <em>Mies van der Rohe: The collages of the Museum of Modern Art in New York</em>, presented on October 28 of 2016, in the Ludwig Fórum in Aachen, Germany. In time, they all made an undeniable contribution to start a debate on this subject. However, in this article we focus on a crucial element of the composition that has not been sufficiently studied: the works of Art.</p> 2021-02-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Gomes, Mariana Veríssimo, Alexandra Casimiro, Carlota Morais