In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs

Authors

  • Margarida Lima Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto; Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar do Porto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v22.i4.9914

Keywords:

Scientific education, publication of scientific manuscripts

Abstract

In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Preparing a manuscript for submission.

Singapore Med J 2009; 50:759 -61; quiz 762.

Peh WC, Ng KH. Conflict -of -interest, copyright and other de-

clarations. Singapore Med J 2010; 51:844 -46; quiz 847.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. How a submitted manuscript is processed.

Singapore Med J 2009; 50:853 -5; quiz 856.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Role of the manuscript reviewer. Singapo-

re Med J 2009; 50:931 -3; quiz 934.

Garmel GM. Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals.

Perm J 2010;14:32 -40.

Annesley TM. Seven reasons not to be a peer reviewer - -and

why these reasons are wrong. Clin Chem 2012; 58:677 -9.

Marusi? M, Sambunjak D, Marusi? A. Guide for peer re-

viewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.

Croat Med J 2005; 46:326 -32.

Pierson DJ. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not ac-

cepted for publication. Respir Care 2004; 49:1246 -52.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Dealing with returned manuscripts. Singa-

pore Med J 2009; 50:1050 -2; quiz 1053.

Annesley TM. Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and edi-

tor comments. Clin Chem 2011; 57:551 -4.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-05

How to Cite

1.
Lima M. In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs. REVNEC [Internet]. 2016Sep.5 [cited 2024Apr.16];22(4):263-8. Available from: https://revistas.rcaap.pt/nascercrescer/article/view/9914

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 4 (2013)

Section

Scientific Education

License

Copyright and access

This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
The works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International license.
Nascer e Crescer – Birth and Growth Medical Journal do not charge any submission or processing fee to the articles submitted.