Accessibility and urban mobility barriers for service in a specialized physical rehabilitation center

Authors

  • Vanessa Vianna Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3564-0457
  • Rute Salomé da Silva Pereira University of Porto , Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4468-0787
  • Nebia Maria Almeida de Figueiredo Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
  • Aline Coutinho Sento Sé Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
  • Edicléa Mascarenhas Fernandes Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
  • Wiliam Cesar Alves Machado Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-7143

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33194/rper.2021.190

Keywords:

Right to Freedom of Movement, Architectural Accessibility, Rehabilitation Centers, Disabled Persons, Mobility Limitation

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to understand the perception of people with physical disabilities or reduced mobility when facing accessibility barriers for service in a specialized rehabilitation center.
Methodology: Qualitative descriptive-exploratory study, conducted in 2019, with 90 users of the physical rehabilitation program of Metropolitan Region I, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Data collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed based on content analysis, thematic approach. Results: The testimonies converged in two categories, which showed the precarious conditions of accessibility on the sidewalks, routes, public transport system, constituting determining factors for increasing the dependence of people to get around.
Discussion: The reports of the participants of this study revealed that the daily confrontation of architectural and attitudinal barriers promotes commitment in several aspects. The daily confrontations of accessibility barriers, the lack of empathy of others, the precarious conditions of maintenance in public transport, contribute to make people feel disrespected, invisible, excluded in the fundamental right to come and go.
Conclusion: We found that the participants face unacceptable architectural and attitudinal barriers from a social and inclusive point of view, aggravated by disrespectful and law-breaking behaviors, obstacles resulting from the lack of urban mobility planning, compromising functional gains for their independence in the right to go and come.

Published

2021-12-16

How to Cite

1.
Vianna V, da Silva Pereira RS, Almeida de Figueiredo NM, Coutinho Sento Sé A, Mascarenhas Fernandes E, Alves Machado WC. Accessibility and urban mobility barriers for service in a specialized physical rehabilitation center. Rev Port Enf Reab [Internet]. 2021Dec.16 [cited 2024May19];5(1):5-14. Available from: https://revistas.rcaap.pt/rper/article/view/29660

Issue

Section

Original article reporting clinical or basic research