Exploring lived space of new build urban environment through photovoice interview

The case of Donau City in Vienna

Authors

Keywords:

urban quality, redevelopment project, lived space, experience, photovoice interview

Abstract

Contemporary urban design practices and new build redevelopment projects are strongly influenced by economic, social and cultural practices, as well as by new forms of management. These different parameters play on the quality production of open spaces. Investigating the place study of Donau City, a mixed-use neighbourhood located in Vienna (Austria), we look at the relations between the new build environment and the daily users. We aim at analysing the intrinsic qualities of this specific urban environment by understanding how residents and users perceive and decode it (emic perspective) and how they make sense of everyday practiced and lived space. In order to do so, we followed a citizen science approach, using photovoice interview with thirteen residents and workers. Commenting the photographs they took on a one-day walk, the users revealed their daily life of their surrounding through design and planning elements associated with personal stories. We analyzed the corpus via inductive coding which helped us conceptualize the users’ lived space (Lefebvre, 2000), perceptions and interactions. Discussing the results, we contribute to a deeper understanding of the role forms, functions and scales play on open spaces’ quality in new build redevelopment projects by bringing in a bottom-up and sensitive approach. We show that social and spatial fragmentation could be mitigated by paying more attention to the emic perceptions and intangible values in spatial conception.

References

Altman, I., Low, Setha M. (1992). Place attachment, Boston, MA: Springer US.

Askarizad, R., Safari, H. (2020). “The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran)”, Cities, 101, 102687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102687

Bigando, E. (2013). “De l’usage de la photo elicitation interview pour appréhender les paysages du quotidien: Retour sur une méthode productrice d’une réflexivité habitante”, Cybergeo. European Journal of Geography. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.25919

Boeije, H. (2010), Analysis in Qualitative Research, London: Sage.

Bohnsack, R. (2008), “The Interpretation of Pictures and the Documentary Method”, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 26. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803267

Bonney, R. (1996), “Citizen science: A lab tradition”, Living Bird: For the Study and Conservation of Birds, 15(4), pp. 7-15.

Brown, B. B., Perkins, D. D. (1992), “Disruptions in place attachment”, in I. Altman, S. M. Low (Eds.), Place Attachment, Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 279-304.

Brubaker, R. (2003). Beyond comparativism? https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7t52j73w

Carmona, M., Marshall, S., Stevens, Q. (2006). “Design codes: Their use and potential”, Progress in Planning, 65(4), pp. 209-289.

Carmona, M.; de Magalhães, C., Hammond, L. (2008), Public space: The management dimension, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927229

Codesal, D. M., Pereira, S., Maiztegui-Oñate, C., Ulloa C. E., Esesumaga, E., López del Molino, A. (2018),

“Walking Around With a Camera. The Uses of Photography in Participatory Research and Social Intervention Processes”, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19 (1). https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2577

Conord, S., Cuny, C. (2014). “Towards a “visual turn” in urban studies? Photographic approaches”, Visual Ethnography, 3(1), 1-6.

City of Vienna, MA 21B. (2010). Donau City. Vienna: Vienna city administration. https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008127.pdf

Crisp, J., Morris, T., Refstie, H. (2012). “Displacement in urban areas: New challenges, new partnerships”, Disasters, 36 (1), pp. 23-42.

Cuny, C., Färber, A., Jarrigeon, A. (Eds.) (2020). L’urbain par l’image, Grâne: Créaphis Editions.

Da Cunha, A., Guinand, S. (Eds.) (2014). Qualité urbaine. Justice spatiale et projet, Lausanne: Editions PPUR.

Ellul, C., Gupta, S., Haklay, M., M., Bryson, K. (2013). “A platform for location-based app development for citizen science and community mapping”, in J. Krisp (Ed.), Progress in location-based services, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 71-90.

Erfani, G. (2020). “Sense of place as an investigative method for the evaluation of participatory urban redevelopment”, Cities, 99, 102648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102648

Fainstein, S. S. (2008), “Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32 (4), pp. 768-785.

Gehl, J. (1971), Life between buildings, Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.

Gehl, J. (2010a), Pour des villes à échelles humaines, Montréal: Écosociété. Internationale de L’imaginaire, 27.

Gehl, J. (2010b). Cities for people, Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.

Gehl, J., Svarre, B. (2013), How to study public life, Washington, DC: Island Press.

Guinand, S. (2015), Régénérer la ville. Patrimoine et politiques d’images à Porto et Marseille, Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.

Guinand, S. (2017a), “Post-tourism on the waterfront: Bringing back locals and residents at the Seaport”, in M. Gravari-Barbas, & S. Guinand (Eds.), Tourism & Gentrification in contemporary Metropolises. International Perspectives, Geography and tourism series, Oxford: Routledge, pp. 207-232.

Guinand, S. (2017b), “Partenariats et production qualitative de l’espace. Aperçus sur le projet négocié à Vienne (Autriche)”, in M. Delabarre, & B. Dugua (Eds.), Faire la ville par le projet, Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires de Lausanne, pp. 47-70.

Heckers, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J., Bonn, A. (2018). “Innovation in open science, society and policy. Setting the agenda for citizen science”, In name of the editor(s), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy, London: UCL Press, pp. 1-23.

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., Bailey, A. (2019), Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Irwin, A. (1995), Citizen science: A study of people, expertise, and sustainable development, London: Routledge.

Jacobs, J. (1992), The death and life of great American cities, New York: Vintage Books.

Koch, R., Latham, A. (2013), “On the hard work of domesticating a public space”, Urban Studies, 50 (1), pp. 6-21.

Kolb, B. (2008), “Involving, Sharing, Analysing—Potential of the Participatory Photo Interview [37 paragraphs]”, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9 (3), Art.12. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803127

Krase, J. (2007), “Visualisation du changement urbain”, Sociétés, 1 (95), pp. 65-87.

Latham, A. (2003), “Research, Performance, and Doing Human Geography: Some Reflections on the Diary-photograph. Diary-interview Method”, Environment and Planning A, 35 (11), pp. 1993-2017.

Lefebvre, H. (2000). La production de l’espace, Paris: Economica.

Leon De, J. P., Cohen, J. H. (2005), “Object and walking probes in ethnographic interviewing”, Field Methods, 17 (2), pp. 200–204.

Lewin, K. (1936) Principles of topological psychology (trans, by F. Heider, G. Heider). New York: McGraw Hill.

Lombard, M. (2013), “Using solicited photography to understand place: Reflections from research in urban informal settlements in Mexico”, Royal Geographical Society, 45 (1), pp. 23-32.

Loughran, K. (2014). “Parks for profit: The high line, growth machines, and the uneven development of urban public spaces”, City & Community, 13 (1), pp. 49-68.

Lynch, K. (1988), L’image de la cité, Paris: Dunod.

Lynch, K., Rodwin, L. (1958), “A Theory of urban form”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 24 (4), pp. 201-214.

Madanipour, A. (1998), “Social exclusion and space”, in A. Madanipour, G. Cars, J. Allen (Eds.), Social exclusion in European cities: Processes, experiences, and responses, London: Jessica Kingsley, Regional Studies Association, pp. 75-95.

Madanipour, A. (2014), Urban design, space and society, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mandelli, K. (2019), “Public space and the challenge of urban transformation in cities of emerging economies: Jeddah case study”, Cities, 95 (102409), pp. 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102409

Maxwell, A. J. (Ed.) (2009), La modélisation de la recherche qualitative: Une approche interactive, Fribourg: Academic Press.

Mey, G., Dietrich, M. (2016). “From Text to Image—Shaping a Visual Grounded Theory Methodology”, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2535/4136

Möller, F. (2010), “Photography after empire: Citizen-photographers or snappers on autopilot?”, New Political Science, 32 (4), pp. 501-513.

Noland, C. M. (2006), “Auto-photography as research practice: Identity and self-esteem research”, Journal of Research Practice, 2 (1), pp. 1-24.

Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (1998), “Émique”, L'Homme, 38 (147), pp. 151-166.

Schaller, S., Guinand, S. (2017), “Popup landscapes: a new trigger to push up land value?”, Urban Geography, 39(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1276719

Pafka, E. (2020). Multi-scalar urban densities: from the metropolitan to the street level. URBAN DESIGN International. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00112-y

Pyyry, N. (2013), “‘Sensing with’ photography and ‘thinking with’ photographs in research into teenage girls' hanging out”, Children’s Geographies, 13 (2), pp. 149-163.

Schoepfer, I. (2014), “Capturing neighbourhood images through photography”, Visual Ethnography, 3 (1), pp. 7-34.

Silverman, D. (2020), Interpreting qualitative data (6th edition), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Pub.

Stedman, R., Beckley, T., Wallace, S., Ambard, M. (2004), “A picture and 1000 words: Using resident-employed photography to understand attachment to high amenity places”, Journal of Leisure Research, 36, pp. 580-606.

Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

Talen, E. (2009), “Design by the rules: The historical underpinnings of form-based codes”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75 (2), pp. 144-160.

Tuan, Y.-F. (1977), Space and place: The perspective of experience, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Twigger-Ross, C., Bonaiuto, M., Breakwell, G. (2003), “Identity theories and environmental psychology”, in M. Bonnes, T. Lee, M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, London: Ashgate, pp. 203-234.

Wang, C., Burris, M. A. (1997). “Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment”, Health, Education & Behaviour, 24 (3), pp. 369-387.

Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21, pp. 171-181.

Woodgate, R. L., Zurba, M., Tennent, P. (2017), “Worth a Thousand Words? Advantages, Challenges and Opportunities in Working with Photovoice as a Qualitative Research Method with Youth and their Families”, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1). https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2577

Wolfe, C. (2019). Urbanism without effort: reconnecting with first principles of the city (Revised edition), Washington, DC: Island Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-03