Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban rivers. The case of the Chili River in Arequipa, Peru
Keywords:
Cultural ecosystem services, blue-green infrastructure, climate change, environmental perception, environmental psychologyAbstract
Urban rivers, as components of the blue-green infrastructure, offer diverse Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES). However, their intangible nature often limits public perception and valuation. This research assessed CES perception along the Chili River in Arequipa, Peru, using surveys and participatory mapping with experts and the general population. Results indicated high valuation of scenic beauty (population: 43%; experts: 63%) and potential for research development (population: 47%; experts: 63%). Experts also emphasized cultural heritage and physical/mental health (50%). The public's primary activities were hiking (57%) and photography (30%), but a gap existed between perceived value and active participation in recreation and education. Experts highlighted tourism potential (78% strongly agree) and intangible heritage (67% strongly agree), while noting a lack of integration in environmental education (64% disagree). Mapping revealed distinct perceptions: the public identified the Intraurban section with the highest CES concentration (scenic beauty, education, heritage, knowledge, research), whereas experts emphasized the North for ecotourism (53%) and spirituality (36%), the Center for culture/landscape, and the South for research (39%) and education (28%). Water pollution (62%) and land use regulation (33%) were identified as key challenges. This study underscores the need to integrate CES into urban planning, promote community engagement, and conduct further research for the Chili River's sustainable management.
References
Aguilar-Barojas, S. (2005). Fórmulas para el cálculo de la muestra en investigaciones de salud. Salud Pública de México, 47(5), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342005000500010
Autoridad Nacional del Agua. (2013). Consejo de Recursos Hídricos de Cuenca Quilca Chili. https://www.ana.gob.pe/consejo-de-cuenca/quilca-chili/portada
Bachi, L., Ribeiro, S. C., Hermes, J., & Saadi, A. (2020). Cultural ecosystem services (CES) in landscapes with a tourist vocation: Mapping and modeling the physical landscape components that bring benefits to people in a mountain tourist destination in southeastern Brazil. Tourism Management, 77, 104017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104017
Bellezoni, R. A., Meng, F., He, P., & Seto, K. C. (2021). Understanding and conceptualizing how urban green and blue infrastructure affects the food, water, and energy nexus: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125825
Bieling, C. (2014). Cultural ecosystem services as revealed through short stories from residents of the Swabian Alb (Germany). Ecosystem Services, 8, 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.002
Bravo, A. S., Camps, S. P., Pérez, M. Á. V., & Arvide, M. G. T. (2024). Soil ecosystem services valuation in a priority terrestrial region for biodiversity conservation in Mexico, from ecological economics and the local community perspective. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00691-8
Bryce, R., Irvine, K. N., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., & Kenter, J. O. (2016). Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 21(Part B), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015
Cano, D., & Haller, A. (2018). Los servicios ecosistémicos hidrológicos: entre la urbanización y el cambio climático. Percepción campesina y experta en la subcuenca del río Shullcas, Perú. Revista Espacio y Desarrollo, 31, 7-32. https://doi.org/10.18800/espacioydesarrollo.201801.001
Carrasco-Torrontegui, A., Gallegos-Riofrío, C. A., Delgado-Espinoza, F., & Swanson, M. (2021). Climate Change, Food Sovereignty, and Ancestral Farming Technologies in the Andes. Current Developments in Nutrition, 5, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa073
Carrasco-Valencia, L., Vilca-Campana, K., Iruri-Ramos, C., Cárdenas-Pillco, B., Ollero, A., & Chanove Manrique, A. (2024). Effect of LULC Changes on Annual Water Yield in the Urban Section of the Chili River, Arequipa, Using the InVEST Model. Water, 16, 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16050664
Cavan, G., Butlin, T., Gill, S., Kingston, R., & Lindley, S. (2021). Climate Change Adaptation: Local Scale Impacts and Responses. In W. Leal Filho & J. V. da Silva (Eds.), Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation (pp. 1–27). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40455-9
Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martín-López, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., & Turner, N. (2016). Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(6), 1462-1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113
Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L., & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925
Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., & Uyttenhove, P. (2021). A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112895
Das, M., Das, A., Saha, M., & Pereira, P. (2022). Use and perception of ecosystem services on an urban river: a case from lower Gangetic plain, Eastern India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 7561–7581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22655-z
Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Shirayama, Y., et al. (2018). Evaluar las contribuciones de la naturaleza a las personas. Science, 359(6373), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645
Dong, W., Du, Y., Duan, Y., Hou, Q., Hou, X., Zeng, Z., & Zhang, L. (2021). Smart city-oriented ecological corridor layout of Sanshui River Basin in arid area of Loess Plateau. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44(35), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.100993
Dou, Y., Zhen, L., De Groot, R., Du, B., & Yu, X. (2017). Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosystem Services, 24, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.011
Durán Vian, F., Pons Izquierdo, J. J., & Serrano Martínez, M. (2021). River-city recreational interaction: A classification of urban riverfront parks and walks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 59, 127042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127042
Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8, 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
Espinoza Cisneros, E., & Ceciliano Calderón, L. (2021). Dinámicas socioecológicas y valores sociales de servicios ecosistémicos en la cuenca del río Savegre, Costa Rica. Región y Sociedad, 33, e1418. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2021/33/1418
European Environment Agency. (2011). Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. In Technical Report (Number 18) (Issue 18). European Environment Agency. https://doi.org/10.2800/88266
García-Martín, M., Quintas-Soriano, C., & Castro, A. J. (2020). Linking cultural ecosystem services to landscape structure: Towards a socio-ecological approach. Landscape Ecology, 35(3), 677-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-00971-8
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 11.0 Update (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Ghermandi, A., Camacho-Valdez, V., & Trejo-Espinosa, H. (2020). Social media-based analysis of cultural ecosystem services and heritage tourism in a coastal region of Mexico. Tourism Management, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104002
Graves, R. A., Pearson, S. M., & Turner, M. G. (2017). Species richness alone does not predict cultural ecosystem service value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 3774–3779. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701370114
Grunewald, K., Bastian, O., Louda, J., Arcidiacono, A., Brzoska, P., Bue, M., Cetin, N.I., Dworczyk, C., Dubova, L., Fitch, A., Jones, L., La Rosa, D., Mascarenhas, A., Ronchi, S., Schlaepfer, M.A., Sikorska, D., Tezer, A. (2021). Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning. Ecosyst. Serv. 49, 101273 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273
Grzyb, T. (2024). Mapping cultural ecosystem services of the urban riverscapes: the case of the Vistula River in Warsaw, Poland. Ecosystem Services, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101584
Grzyb, T., & Kulczyk, S. (2023). How do ephemeral factors shape recreation along the urban river? A social media perspective. Urban Landscape and Planning, 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104638
Haines-Young, R., Potschin-Young, M. (2018). Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5.1): a Policy Brief. One Ecosystem 3, e27108. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108
Hale, R. L., Cook, E. M., & Beltrán, B. J. (2019). Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis. Ecological Indicators, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105580
Harrison, P. A., Dunford, R., Barton, D. N., Kelemen, E., Martín-López, B., Norton, L., Termansen, M., Saarikoski, H., Hendriks, K., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Czúcz, B., García-Llorente, M., Howard, D., Jacobs, S., Karlsen, M., Kopperoinen, L., Madsen, A., Rusch, G., van Eupen, M., Verweij, P., Smith, R., Tuomasjukka, D., & Zulian, G. (2018). Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: A decision tree approach. Ecosystem Services, 29, 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
Huarachi, R., & Gonzalez, R. (2012). Hydra vulgaris Pallas, 1766 (Hydrozoa: Hydridae) como bioindicador de la calidad de aguas del Río Chili, Arequipa, Perú. The Biologist, 10, 125-137. https://doi.org/10.24039/rtb2012102466
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. (2017). Censos Nacionales 2017: XII de Población, VII de Vivienda y III de Comunidades Indígenas: Resultados definitivos. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1539/
Iojă, C. I., Osaci-Costache, G., Breuste, J., Hossu, C. A., Grădinaru, S. R., Onose, D. A., & Skokanová, H. (2018). Integrating urban blue and green areas based on historical evidence. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.001
Iruri-Ramos, C., Chanove-Manrique, A., Vilca-Campana, K., Carrasco-Valencia, L., & Cardenas-Pillco, B. (2023). Ecosystem services of blue-green infrastructure (BGI) for climate change adaptation and mitigation in an arid region [paper presentation], ZEMCH International Conference, pp. 56-68.
Jones, L., Boeri, M., Christie, M., Durance, I., Evans, K. L., Fletcher, D., Harrison, L., Jorgensen, A., Masante, D., McGinlay, J., Paterson, D. M., Schmucki, R., Short, C., Small, N., Southon, G., Stojanovic, T., & Waters, R. (2022). Can we model cultural ecosystem services, and are we measuring the right things? People and Nature, 4, 166-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10271
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Korpilo, S., Nyberg, E., Vierikko, K., Nieminen, H., Arciniegas, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2023). Developing a multi-sensory public participation GIS (MSPPGIS) method for integrating landscape values and soundscapes of urban green infrastructure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 230, 104617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104617
Langemeyer, J., Calcagni, F., & Baró, F. (2018). Mapping the intangible: Using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics. Land Use Policy, 77, 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.0
Lee, D. K. (2024). Analysis of the potential value of cultural ecosystem services: A case study of Busan City, Republic of Korea. Ecosystem Services, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101596
Le Corre, N., Saint-Pierre, A., Hughes, M., Peuziat, I., Cosquer, A., Michot, T., & Bernard, N. (2021). Outdoor recreation in French coastal and marine protected areas: Exploring recreation experience preference as a way for building conservation support. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 33, 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100332
Liao, K. (2019). The socio-ecological practice of building blue-green infrastructure in high-density cities: What does the ABC Waters Program in Singapore tell us? Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 1, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-019-00009-3
Magdaleno, F., Cortes, F., & Molina, B. (2018). Infraestructuras verdes y azules: estrategias de adaptación y mitigación ante el cambio climático. Ingeniería Civil (Revista Digital del CEDEX), (191), 105–112. http://ingenieriacivil.cedex.es/index.php/ingenieria-civil/article/view/2350
Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., & Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 44.
Montesinos-Tubée, D., Núñez, H., Toni, B., Álvarez, E., Borgoño, A., Zegarra, J., Gutiérrez, G., Maldonado, M., Rodríguez, M., Riveros, G., & Guillén, D. (2019). Diversidad florística, comunidades vegetales y propuestas de conservación del monte ribereño en el Río Chili (Arequipa, Perú). Arnaldoa, 26, 97–130. https://doi.org/10.22497/arnaldoa.261.26106
Nowak-Olejnik, A., Działek, J., Hibner, J., Liro, J., Madej, R., Sudmanns, M., & Haase, D. (2024). The benefits and disbenefits associated with cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces. Science of the Total Environment, 926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172092
Oficina de Asesoría y Consultoría Ambiental. (2002). Proyecto Prochili: Plan de gestión ambiental de la cuenca metropolitana del río Chili, Arequipa. Municipalidad Provincial de Arequipa.
Ollero, A., García, J. H., Ibisate, A., & Sánchez-Fabre, M. (2021). Updated knowledge on floods and risk management in the Middle Ebro River: The “Anthropocene” context and river resilience. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 47, 73–94. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.4730
Rall, E., Bieling, C., Zytynska, S., & Haase, D. (2017). Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use. Ecological Indicators, 77, 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.001
Riechers, M., Barkmann, J., & Tscharntke, T. (2016). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosystem Services, 17, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007
Roco Videla, Á., Hernández Orellana, M., Silva González, O. (2021). ¿Cuál es el tamaño muestral adecuado para validar un cuestionario? Nutrición Hospitalaria, 38(4), 877-878. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.03633
Salazar, B., Cutipa, J., Ramirez, G., Juyo, R., Paredes, J., & Villanueva, J. (2017). Estudio de la contaminación por cromo (Cr) en el río Chili y Parque Industrial de Río Seco (PIRS), Arequipa - Perú 2015-2016. Veritas, 16(1), 43-46. https://doi.org/10.35286/veritas.v16i1.82
Santos-Martín, F., Nedkov, S., Campagne, S., Borisova, B., Krpec, P., Prodanova, H., Kokkoris, I. P., Hristova, D., Le Clec'h, S., Burkhard, B., Bekri, E. S., Stoycheva, V., Bruzón, A. G., & Dimopoulos, P. (2022). Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: A review in the context of ecosystem accounting. Ecosystem Services, 56, 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101458
Sarukhán, J., & Whyte, A. (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
Schutter, M. S., Hicks, C. C., Phelps, J., & Belmont, C. (2021). Disentangling ecosystem services preferences and values. World Development, 146, 105621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105621
Sikorski, P., Gawryszewska, B., Sikorska, D., Chormánski, J., Schwerk, A., Jojczyk, A., ... Łaszkiewicz, E. (2021). The value of doing nothing How informal green spaces can provide comparable ecosystem services to cultivated urban parks. Ecosystem Services, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101339
Smith, N., Georgiou, M., King, A. C., Tieges, Z., & Chastin, S. (2022). Factors influencing usage of urban blue spaces: A systems-based approach to identify leverage points. Health & Place, 73, 102735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102735
Stepniewska, M., & Sobczak, U. (2017). Assessing the synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services provided by urban floodplains: The case of the Warta River Valley in Poznań, Poland. Land Use Policy, 69, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.026
Talavera, C., Ortega, A., Jiménez, P., Villegas, L., Villasante, F., Vivanco, C., & Fernández, C. (2011). Mapa de la vegetación en la cuenca del río Chili, Arequipa – Perú. In Memorias IV Congreso Internacional de Ecosistemas Secos (p. 46). Universidad Nacional de San Agustín. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22864.05126
UNESCO. (2000). Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de Arequipa. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1016/
Valença Pinto, L., Inácio, M., Bogdzevič, K., Gomes, E., & Pereira, P. (2024). Factors affecting the use of cultural ecosystem services in Lithuanian coastal area. Ocean and Coastal Management, 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107095
Valladares, F., Gil, P., & Forner, A. (Coords.). (2017). Bases científico-técnicas para la Estrategia estatal de infraestructura verde y de la conectividad y restauración ecológicas. Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente.
Veerkamp, C. J., Schipper, A. M., Hedlund, K., Lazarova, T., Nordin, A., & Hanson, H. I. (2021). A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure. Ecosystem Services, 52, 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101367
Vercruysse, K., Vilcan, T., & Wright, N. (2020). The blue-green path to urban flood resilience. Blue-Green Systems, 2(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2019.199
Vert, C., Carrasco-Turigas, G., Zijlema, W., Espinosa, A., Cano-Riu, L., Elliott, L. R., Litt, J., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., & Gascon, M. (2019). Impact of a riverside accessibility intervention on use, physical activity, and wellbeing: A mixed methods pre-post evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 190, 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103611
Vidal-Llamas, A., Nicolás-Ruiz, N., Suárez Alonso, M. L., & Vidal-Abarca Gutiérrez, M. R. (2024). Exploring the cultural ecosystem services of arid watersheds: A social media analysis. Journal of Arid Environments, 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105141
Vilca-Campana, K., Carrasco-Valencia, L., Iruri-Ramos, C., Cárdenas-Pillco, B., Escudero, A., & Chanove-Manrique, A. (2025). Improving urban flood resilience: Urban flood risk mitigation assessment using a geospatial model in the urban section of a river corridor. Water, 17(7), 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071047
Vollmer, D., Prescott, M. F., Padawangi, R., Girot, C., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2015). Understanding the value of urban riparian corridors: Considerations in planning for cultural services along an Indonesian river. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.011
Völker, S., & Kistemann, T. (2011). The impact of blue space on human health and well-being – Salutogenetic health effects of inland surface waters: A review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 214(6), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.05.001
Wang, Y., & Hayashi, K. (2023). Methodological development of cultural ecosystem services evaluation using location data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136523
White, M. P., Elliott, L. R., Gascon, M., Roberts, B., & Fleming, L. E. (2020). Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits. Environmental Research, 191, 110169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110169
White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004
Yli-Pelkonen, V., Pispa, K., & Helle, I. (2006). The role of stream ecosystems in urban planning: A case study from the stream Rekolanoja in Finland. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(6), 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830610702511
Zeballos, C. (2020). Atlas Ambiental de Arequipa. Neo Cromatika (Eds.), Vicerrectorado de Investigación de la Universidad Católica de Santa María: Arequipa, Perú, pp. 80-85.
Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., Dong, G., Yu, Z., & Liu, K. (2021). Identifying the supply-demand mismatches of ecorecreation services to optimize sustainable land use management: A case study in the Fenghe River watershed, China. Ecological Indicators, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108424
Zhang, K. (2014). Understanding Recreational Services of Urban Riverfront Space for Planning Purposes [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kassel]. https://kobra.uni-kassel.de/handle/123456789/2014072845763?locale-attribute=en
Zhao, N., Wang, H., Zhong, J., Sun, D., 2022. Assessment of recreational and cultural ecosystem services value of islands. Land. 11, 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020205
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Berly Cárdenas-Pillco, Karla Vilca-Campana, Vivian Macedo-Medina, Lorenzo Carrasco-Valencia, Carla Iruri-Ramos, Andrea Chanove-Manrique
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios by DINÂMIA'CET-Iscte is licensed under a CC-BY licence.
