Publicação Científica Sob Pressão: Preservar a Confiança na Era da Inteligência Artificial

Dahl J. Is Growth Always Good News? 2026 Article Submission Surges [2026 Sep 17] Disponível em: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/05/13/guest-post-is-growth-always-good-news-2026-article-submission-surges/

Elston DM. Artificial intelligence: The good, the bad, and the ugly. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025;93:1413-4. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2025.08.039.

Kocak Z. Publication ethics in the era of artificial intelligence. J Korean Med Sci. 2024;39:e249. doi:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249.

Leung TI, de Azevedo Cardoso T, Mavragani A, Eysenbach G. Best practices for using AI tools as an author, peer reviewer, or editor. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e51584. doi:10.2196/51584.

Resnik DB, Hosseini M. Hallucinated citations produced by generative artificial intelligence may constitute research misconduct when citations function as data in scholarly papers. Account Res. 2026:2645390. doi:10.1080/08989621.2026.2645390.

Baethge C, Jergas H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of quotation inaccuracy in medicine. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2025;10:13. doi:10.1186/s41073-025-00173-z

Frontiers. BE WISE: the six principles of human oversight in AI-assisted research. Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA [consultado 2026 Sep 18]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/ai-playbook/be-wise-framework

BaHammam AS. The Transparency Paradox: Why Researchers Avoid Disclosing AI Assistance in Scientific Writing. Nat Sci Sleep. 2025;17:2569-74. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S568375

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals [consultado2026 Sep 17]. Disponível em: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/