Critical analysis of Imogene King’s theory of goal attainment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12707/RVI23.17.29335Keywords:
nursing theory, nursing research, models, nursing, nursingAbstract
Background: Imogene King’s theory of goal attainment has proven to be useful for nursing development, however, its use is limited, which highlights the need to critically analyze its contribution to the discipline.
Objective: To critically analyze Imogene King’s goal attainment theory, as proposed methodologically by Chinn and Kramer.
Main topics under analysis: An analysis was carried out according to the criteria for theoretical reflection proposed by Chinn and Kramer, which consists of two phases: 1) description of the theory, considering the purpose, concepts and definitions, relationships, structure, and assumptions; and 2) critical reflection, including clarity, simplicity, generality, accessibility, and importance.
Conclusion: The theory is clear, simple, generalizable, accessible, and important for professional practice. However, it has limitations in its scope with patients who are unable to interact, and it is not parsimonious due to the incorporation of many concepts. More empirical evidence is required to demonstrate its use in practice.
.
Downloads
References
Adib-Hajbaghery, M., & Tahmouresi, M. (2018). Nurse patient relationship based on the Imogene King´s theory of goal attainment. Nursing Midwifery Study, 7(3), 141-144. https://journals.lww.com/nams/fulltext/2018/07030/nurse_patient_relationship_based_on_the_imogene.9.aspx
Alligood, M. R. (2018). Modelos y teorías en enfermería (9° ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. Alves, H. L., Lima, G. D., Albuquerque, G. A., Gomes, E. B., Cavalcante, E. G., & Viana, M. C. (2021). Uso das teorias de enfermagem nas teses brasileiras: Estudo bibliométrico. Cogitare Enfermagem, 26, e71743. https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v26i0.71743
Carroll, K. (2020). Living the art and science of nursing: Flow and transitioning. Nursing Science Quarterly, 33(1), 27-28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894318419881804
Carvajal, E. Y., & Sánchez, B. (2018). Los modelos de enfermería aplicados en la práctica clínica: Revisión integrativa. Archivos de Medicina, 18(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.18.1.1701.2018
Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2018). Knowledge development in nursing: Theory and process (10th ed.). Elsevier.
Fitzpatrick, J., & Whall, A. (2005). Conceptual models of nursing: Analysis and application (4th ed). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Frey, M. A., Sieloff, C. L., & Norris, D. M. (2002). King’s conceptual system and theory of goal attainment: Past, present, and future. Nursing Science Quarterly, 15(2), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/089431840201500204
Fronczek, A. E. (2022). Ushering in a new era for King’s conceptual system and theory of goal attainment. Nursing Science Quarterly, 35(1), 89-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184211051373
Fronczek, A. E., & Messmer, P. R. (2022). Imogene M. King: Sistema conceptual y teoría de nivel medio del logro de objetivos. In M. Raile Alligood (Ed.), Modelos y teorías en enfermería (10ª ed.,213-230). Editorial Elsevier.
Kim, E. J., Nho, J. H., Kim, H. Y., & Park, S. K. (2021). The effects of lifestyle interventions on the health-promoting behavior, type D personality, cognitive function and body composition of low-income middle-aged Korean women. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 18(11), 5637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115637
King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts, process. Wiley.
King, I. M. (2007). King’s structure, process, and outcome in the 21st century. In C.L. Sieloff & M. Frey (Eds.), Middle range theory development using king’s conceptual system (3-11). Springer Publishing Company.
McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2021). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health. McQueen, L., Cockroft, M., & Mullins, N. (2017). Imogene King´s theory of goal attainment and the millenial nurse: An important mentoring tool for nurse educators. Teaching and Learning Nursing, 12(3), 223-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.03.003
Meleis, A. I. (2012). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Wolters Kluwer Health.
Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2018). Reviewing the literature: Choosing a review design. Evidence Based Nursing, 21(2), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102895
Peterson, S., & Bredow, T. S. (2013). Middle range theories: Application to nursing research and practice (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Siti, N. K., Nursalam, N., Adriani, M., Ahsan, A., & Tantut, S. (2018). Structural model for public health nurses’ performance in the implementation of family nursing based on nursing relational capital. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 9(1), 914-926. http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/33_susanto_original_10_2.pdf
Younas, A., & Quennell, S. (2019). Usefulness of nursing theory-guided practice: An integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 33(3), 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12670
