From Symbol of Domination to Tourist Attraction: The Reappropriation of Colonial Heritage in Ho Chi Minh City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57883/thij26(2)2026.44489Palavras-chave:
Colonial heritage, Tourism valorization, Adaptive reuse, Dissonant heritageResumo
Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), formerly Saigon, boasts a rich colonial architectural heritage that has transitioned from symbols of French domination to key tourist attractions, driving economic growth. Amid a 15.7% surge in international visitors in early 2025, this heritage, encompassing buildings like the Notre-Dame Cathedral and Central Post Office, distinguishes HCMC from other Vietnamese sites focused on natural or ancient wonders. Colonial heritage is often labeled “dissonant”, evoking tensions between pride in architectural value and memories of exploitation, yet in HCMC, it faces little contestation. Rooted in French colonial urban planning from the late 19th century, these structures blend European and local elements, adapted to tropical conditions. Post-independence, Vietnam’s heritage policies, influenced by colonial-era frameworks like the 1900 decree, evolved through laws such as the 2001 Cultural Heritage Act, prioritizing preservation alongside development. In HCMC, urban plans since 1997 have inventoried and classified over 1,200 villas, enforcing protections against demolition. Adaptive reuse has been pivotal: public buildings retain functions or become museums, while private ones transform into cafés and shops, balancing sustainability with economic viability. Tourism amplifies this, integrating sites into circuits with modern amenities like illuminated facades and info plaques, appealing to global visitors without erasing historical complexities. Ultimately, this reappropriation reflects reconciliation, where aesthetic and functional values eclipse painful symbolism, fostering cultural dialogue and prosperity in a dynamic urban context.
Referências
Adas, M. (2004). Contested hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian assault on the civilizing mission ideology. Journal of World History, 15(1), 31-63. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2004.0017
Ardiyanto, A., Soesilo, R., Suroto, V., & Prawoto, H. (2019). Changes in the function of colonial houses for office buildings. In SMART: Seminar on Architecture Research and Technology (pp. 191-198).
Arfa, F. H., Zijlstra, H., Lubelli, B., & Quist, W. (2022). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: From a literature review to a model of practice. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 13(2), 148-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2021.2011825
Ben Hamouche, M. (2020). L’héritage architectural colonial: Possession et patrimonialisation contestées. Cas de l’Algérie. African and Mediterranean Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 2(2), 52-63.
Boutabba, H., Farhi, A., & Mili, M. (2014). Le patrimoine architectural colonial dans la région du Hodna, un héritage en voie de disparition: Cas de la ville de M’sila en Algérie. L’Année du Maghreb, 10, 269-295. https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.2053
Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient. (1907). 7.
Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient. (1908). 8.
Da Costa, M. J. (2015). La notion de patrimoine colonial en Chine. E-Phaïstos, 4(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.4000/ephaistos.1035
François, H., Hirczak, M., & Senil, N. (2006). Territoire et patrimoine: La co-construction d’une dynamique et de ses ressources. Revue d’Économie Régionale et Urbaine, 5, 683–700. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.065.0683
Frigolé, J. (2010). Patrimonialization and mercantilization of the authentic: Two fundamental strategies in a tertiary economy. In X. Roigé & J. Frigolé (Eds.), Constructing cultural and natural heritage: Parks, museums and rural heritage (pp. 27–38). Documenta Universitaria.
Gaussens, P., et al. (2024). Critique de la raison décoloniale: Sur une contre-révolution intellectuelle. L’Échappée.
Hitchcock, M., King, V. T., & Parnwell, M. J. G. (Eds.). (2010). Heritage tourism in Southeast Asia. NIAS Press.
Kisić, V. (2013). Governing heritage dissonance: Promises and realities of selected cultural policies. European Cultural Foundation.
Lask, T., & Herold, S. (2004). An observation station for culture and tourism in Vietnam: A forum for world heritage and public participation. Current Issues in Tourism, 7(4–5), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500508668271
Lê, V. H., Hoang, M. P., & Ngô, M. H. (2021). The decorative art of Indochinese architecture in Saigon–Ho Chi Minh City. In First Van Lang International Conference on Heritage and Technology Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2406, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0066538
Linehan, D., Clark, I. D., & Xie, P. F. (Eds.). (2020). Colonialism, tourism and place: Global transformations in tourist destinations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mignolo, W. D. (2017). Coloniality is far from over, and so must be decoloniality. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry, 43, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/692552
Nguyễn, C. D. L. (2013). Outils d’urbanisme et investissements immobiliers privés: Fabrication de l’espace central de Ho Chi Minh-Ville (Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris-Est).
Nguyễn, T. H. (2012). Bảo tồn di sản văn hóa trong quá trình đô thị hóa (trường hợp thành phố Hồ Chí Minh). Tạp chí Khoa học Xã hội Việt Nam, 2, 71–77.
Nguyễn, T., & Krowolski, N. (2005). Hội An, de l’éveil à la résurrection du patrimoine. Autrepart, 33, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.3917/autr.033.0141
Olsen, D. H., & Timothy, D. J. (2002). Contested religious heritage: Differing views of Mormon heritage. Tourism Recreation Research, 27(2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2002.11081217
Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353
Roosmalen, P. K. M. van. (2003). Changing views on colonial heritage. In Proceedings of OAI (pp. 123–129).
Roosmalen, P. K. M. van. (2013). Confronting built heritage: Shifting perspectives on colonial architecture in Indonesia. ABE Journal, 3. https://doi.org/10.4000/abe.350
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
Truong, T. H., & On, N. Y. N. (2024). Colonial architecture in Indochina: An overview of studies and future challenges. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 45(2), 5497–5503.
Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Wiley.
Verney, S. (2017). Spécificités et ambiguïtés du patrimoine colonial: L’exemple franco-vietnamien (1858–2014). Ethnologies, 39(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040747ar
Young, R. J. C. (2001). Postcolonialism: An historical introduction. Blackwell.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Thanh Tin Nguyen Thuc

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.

