Use of RUSH Protocol in the Differential Diagnosis of the Patient in Shock

Authors

  • Joana Fernandes de Sousa Anesthesiology Service, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Tiago Duarte Anesthesiology Service, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Gonçalo Almeida Anesthesiology Service, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Maria Pereira Anesthesiology Service, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.16135

Keywords:

Aged; Anaphylaxis; Clinical Protocols; Diagnosis, Differential; Geriatric Assessment; Shock/diagnostic imaging; Wounds and Injuries

Abstract

Trauma geriatric patients have become increasingly common and assessment of these patients presents a unique challenge. In trauma, massive hemorrhage is the main cause of preventable death. We describe a case of an unexpected severe anaphylactic shock in a fisherman victim of a shipwreck. The patient presented in the emergency room with his thigh sliced through with a broken wooden oar, hemodynamically stable. In the operating room to avoid the platelet dysfunction induced by aspirin, a platelet concentrate was administered. 30 minutes into surgery the patient became hypotensive and vasopressor support was initiated with transitory response. RUSH examination excluded hypovolemia, cardiac dysfunction or pneumothorax. A generalized erythema was found and treatment for anaphylaxis was initiated. Anaphylactic shock is rare potentially life-threatening reaction and in anesthetized patients
is recognition presents a challenge.Although hemorrhage is the main cause of death in trauma we must be prepared to exclude other causes of shock.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cantle PM, Cotton BA. Balanced resuscitation in trauma management. Surg Clin North Am. 2017;97:999-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.002.
2. ATLS Subcommittee; American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma; International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:1363-6. doi: 10.1097/
TA.0b013e31828b82f5.
3. Reske-Nielsen C, Medzon R. Geriatric Trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016;34:483-500. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.04.004.
4. Moranville MP, Mieure KD, Santayana EM. Evaluation and management of shock States: hypovolemic, distributive, and cardiogenic shock. J Pharm Pract. 2011;24:44-60. doi: 10.1177/0897190010388150.
5. Rahmani F, Ebrahimi Bakhtavar H, Shahsavari Nia K, Mohammadi N. Transient Unexplained Shock in 30-year-old Trauma Patient. Emerg. 2014;2:101-3.
6. Blanco P, Aguiar FM, Blaivas M. Rapid Ultrasound in Shock (RUSH) Velocity- Time Integral: A Proposal to Expand the RUSH Protocol. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:1691-700. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.14.08059.
7. Jacobsen RC, Gratton MC. A case of unrecognized prehospital anaphylactic shock. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011;15:61-6. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.519823.
8. Sampson HA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/ Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2006;117:391-7.
9. Kiefel V. Reactions Induced by Platelet Transfusions. Transfus Med Hemother. 2008;35:354-8

Published

2019-05-31

How to Cite

de Sousa, J. F., Duarte, T., Almeida, G., & Pereira, M. (2019). Use of RUSH Protocol in the Differential Diagnosis of the Patient in Shock. Journal of the Portuguese Society of Anesthesiology, 28(2), 133–135. https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.16135