Return, not return or movement between places?
Different migratory practices and their impacts on the present and future of a place of departure (Montesinho village)
Keywords:migratory practices, (im)mobilities, return migration, internal migrations, translocalism
The decision between carrying out a definitive return migration or not, the option for circulation, or the impossibility of choosing will be discussed in this article, which proposes a typology of practices and trajectories to rethink about the migrants' residential strategies and multilocal mobilities among different places in one or more countries. Migration trajectories initiated between the decades of 19(60) and 19(70) were examined and was tried to identify some of the factors that influenced the different choices, and which weighed more in the decision to return, stay or circulate among different places. The typology formulated from a specific context, the place of departure and the multiple connections between this place and other places in Portugal and Europe made it possible to indicate and question some of the causes that will have determined a greater or lesser rigidity/fluidity of migratory practices. These migration cycle which provoked a strong impact in the past, present and future of the territories, that saw the departure of a great part of population will be analysed departing from the (im)mobilities from one place, Montesinho village, which could constitute a study case to think about possible policies which could contribute to the development of these regions, profits of the emigrants investment in departure places and attract people to these same territories. The pandemy and climatic changes provoked by global warming give more centrality to the gestion of these territories and with this article we hope to help to the urgent reflection and action.
Alarcão, A. (1969). Mobilidade geográfica da população de Portugal (Continente e Ilhas Adjacentes): migrações internas 1921-1960, Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Basch, L., Glick Schiller, N. & Blanc-Szanton, C. (1992). Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity and nationalism reconsidered, New York, New York Academy of Sciences.
Bocker, A., & Gehring, A. (2015). “Returning ‘home’ after retirement? The role of gender in return migration decisions of Spanish and Turkish migrants”, Review of Social Studies (RoSS), Vol. 2, No.1, pp. 77-97.
Burawoy, M. (1998). “The extended case method”, Sociological Theory, V. 16, 1: 4-33.
Carmo, A., & Rêgo, Patrícia (2020). “Covid-19 no Alentejo: breves notas sobre territórios de baixa densidade e o seu futuro”, Finisterra, LV (115), pp. 163-168.
De Haas, H. de, & Fokkema, T. (2010). “Notes and Comentaries”, Population and Development Review, 36(3), pp. 541–561.
Fitzgerald, D. S. (2010). “Mixed Methods and Crossing Boundaries in the Study of International Migration” in Thomas Faist (ed.), Working Papers – Centre on Migration, Citizenship and Development, 73, Bielefeld, COMCAD.
Fonseca, L. (1990). População e Território do País à Área Metropolitana, Lisboa, Centro de Estudos Geográficos.
Gmelch, G. (1980). Return Migration, Annual Review of Anthropology, 9: 135-159.
Hedberg, C., & Carmo, R. M. (Eds.) (2012). Translocal Ruralism - Mobility and Connectivity in European Rural Spaces. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
King, R., Skeldon, R., & Vullnetari, J. (2008). Internal and International Migration: Bridging the Theoretical Divide, Working Paper, Sussex, Sussex Centre for Migration Research, University of Sussex.
Marcus, G. (2014). “What is at Stake – and is not – in the Idea and Practice of Multi-sited Ethnography” in Henrietta L. Moore and Todd Sanders (eds.), Anthropology in Theory Issues in Epistemology. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 531-534.
Peixoto, J. (1998). “Seletividade migratória e dinâmicas regionais: as migrações inter-regionais em Portugal nos anos 80”. Revista de Estatística, 3.o quad, pp. 73-112.
Portela, J., & Nobre, S. (2001). “Entre Pinela e Paris: emigração e regressos”, Análise Social, vol. XXXVI (161), pp. 1105-1146.
Roudometof, V. (2014). “Nationalism, globalization and glocalization”, Thesis Eleven, Vol. 122 (I), pp. 18-33.
Salazar, N. B. (2018). “Discussion: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Glocalization”, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, April, 33.1, pp. 11-32.
Sampaio, D. (2017). “Ageing ‘here’ or ‘there’? Spatio-temporalities in older labour migrants’return aspirations from the Azores”, Finisterra, LII, 106, pp. 49-64.
Saraiva, A. (2017). Casas (pós-)rurais entre 1900 e 2015: expressões arquitetónicas e trajetórias identitárias, Lisboa, Edições Colibri.
Sayad, A. (2010). La doble ausencia De las ilusiones del emigrado a los padecimientos del inmigrado”, Barcelona, Anthropos.
Copyright (c) 2022 João Baía
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios by DINÂMIA'CET-IUL is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial-Proibição de realização de Obras Derivadas 4.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org.