Environmental Risk Management and Communication in an African Context: The case of the Mozal bypass in Mozambique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4000/cea.1692Palavras-chave:
Mozambique, environmental risk, risk management, risk communication, participation, pollutionResumo
This article aims to analyze the way in which Environmental Risk is managed and communicated to local people in an African context. In particular, the article considers the experience of one of the largest multinationals that operates in Mozambique: Mozal (Mozambique Aluminum). In 2010, it decided to make a “bypass” at its two Fume Treatment Centres. For six months, Mozal had been authorized to discharge emissions into the air without any filters, possibly damaging human health. The article seeks to understand how the various parties involved, institutional or otherwise, acted in order to prevent, manage and communicate this risk. The study is developed at two levels: firstly, the debate on risk communication in the Mozambican context; secondly, the same debate but at international level. As a conclusion, it is possible to argue that the weak and formal model of democracy present in Mozambique did not make it possible to obtain guarantees that have been considered serious and significant at international level.Referências
Adenle, A. A. (2001). Are transgenic crops safe? GM agriculture in Africa. In http://unu.edu/publications/articles/are-transgenic-crops-safe-gm-agriculture-in-africa.html (accessed January 19, 2012).
AfriMAP & Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa. (2009). Moçambique, democracia e participação política. Johannesburg: Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa.
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (Eds.) (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Standford University Press.
Bloemertz, L., Doevenspeck, M., Macamo, E., & Müller-Mahn, D. (2012). Introduction. In Bloemertz, L., Doevenspeck, M., Macamo, E., & Müller-Mahn, D. (Eds.), Risk and Africa (pp. 1-16). Zürich: LIT Verlag.
Bussotti, L. (2013). Analysis of the press coverage environmental risk of Mozambique: The Mozal bypass case and newspaper “Notícias” and “O País”. Revista Luciérnaga, 5(10), 28-40.
CAO (Compliance Advisor Ombudsman). (2011). Ombudsman assessment report: Complaint regarding the MIGA PT Weda Bay Nickel Project (#8113). Halmahera Island, North Maluku, Indonesia. In http://www.cao-ombudsman.org
CAO Compliance. (2012, July 24). Appraisal report. CAO Ref. Code: C-1-R6-Y12-F160, 2012.
Castel-Branco, C. N. (2010). Economia extractiva e desafios da industrialização em Moçambique. In Brito, L. de, Castel-Branco, C. N., Chichava, S., & Francisco, A. (Org.), Economia extractiva e desafios da industrialização em Moçambique. Maputo: Institute for Economic and Social Studies (IESE).
Covello, V. T., Sandman, P., & Slovic, P. (1988). Risk communication, risk statistics and risk comparisons: A manual for plant managers. Washington, DC: Chemical Manufacturers Association.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London & New York: Routledge.
EIB (European Investment Bank). (2012, April). Mozal Project, Maputo, Mozambique, Complaint SG/E/2010/16, Conclusions Report. In http://www.eib.org/about/publications/complaints-mechanism-policy.htm
Fauvet, P. (2010, September 27). Mozambique: No threat to environment from Mozal bypass. In http://www.allafrica.com
Fauvet, P. (2010, September 30). Tell me lies about Mozal. In http://www.allafrica.com
Fauvet, P. (2010, October 13). Mozambique: External environmental monitors working at Mozal. In http://www.allafrica.com
Fauvet, P. (2010, October 27). Mozal pledges emissions will not exceed legal limits. In http://www.allafrica.com
Fauvet, P. (2010, October 29). Mozambique: Assembly votes to debate Mozal. In http://www.allafrica.com
Fauvet, P. (2010, November 3). Mozambique: Mozal bypass essential to avoid collapse. In http://www.allafrica.com
Fiorino, D. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(2), 226-243.
G8. (2005, July). Joint science academies’statement: Science and technology for African development. Gleneagles: G8. In http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Herman, E., & McChesney, R. (1999). The global media in the late 1990s. In Mackay, H., & O’Sullivan, T. (Eds.), The media reader: Continuity and transformation (pp. 178-210). London: Sage.
Holloway, A. (2012). Disaster risk in Africa: Dynamic discourse or dysfunctional dialogue? In Bloemertz, L., Doevenspeck, M., Macamo, E., & Müller-Mahn, D. (Eds.), Risk and Africa (pp. 17- 34). Zürich: LIT Verlag.
IESE (Institute for Economic and Social Studies). (2010). Desafios da indústria extractiva em Moçambique. Maputo: IESE.
INE (Instituto Nacional de Estatística). (2005). Anuário Estatístico. Maputo: Artes Gráficas.
Justiça Ambiental. (2010, April 8). SOS Saúde Pública e Ambiente. Maputo.
Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., et al. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177-187.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
Kitzinger, J. (1999). Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 55-69.
Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1983). The decline of confidence in American institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 98(3), 379-402.
DOI : 10.2307/2150494
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: John Wiley.
Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Rutledge.
McCallum, D. B., Hammond, S. L., & Covello, V. T. (1991, October). Communicating about environmental risks: How the public uses and perceives information sources. Health Education & Behaviour, 18(3), 349-361.
National Civic Review. (1992). Opinion poll: Confidence in all levels of government is down, but local government still most trusted. 81(4), 518-519.
Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 43-54.
República de Moçambique – Ministério para a Coordenação Ambiental – Gabinete do Ministro. (2010). Informe apresentado pela MOZAL S.A.R.L. no passado dia 05 de Abril de 2010, no Centro de Conferências Joaquim Chissano, Maputo, 14 de Junho de 2010, Eng. Maurício Xirinda.
Rønning, H. (2009). Strengths and weaknesses: Political change and the media in Africa since the 1990s. In Rønning, H., & Orgeret, K. (Eds.), The power of communication: Changes and challenges in African media (pp. 25-65). Oslo: Unipub.
Sandman, P. (2001). Explaining environmental risk. In http://www.psandman.com (accessed October 11, 2013).
Sjöberg, L., Kolarova, D., Rucai, A.-A., Bernström, M.-L., & Flygelholm, H. (1996). Risk perception and media risk reports in Bulgaria and Romania. Rhizikon, Risk Research Report No. 23. Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.
Sjöberg, L. (1998). The rise of risk: Related bills submitted to the Swedish Parliament in 1964-65 and 1993-95. Journal of Risk Research, 1, pp. 191-195.
DOI : 10.1080/136698798377114
Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1-11.
Sousa Santos, B. de (2004). Do pós-moderno ao pós-colonial. E para além de um e outro. In http://www.ces.uc.pt/misc/Do_pos-moderno_ao_pos-colonial.pdf
Sowby, F.D. (1965). Radiation and other risks. Health Physics, 11(9), 879-887.
DOI : 10.1097/00004032-196509000-00008
Starr, C. (1969). Social benefit versus technological risk. Science, 165(3899), 1232-1238.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2011, April 17). Genetically modified crops in Africa. In http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/51cbedd77896bb431f6944ef/ (accessed September 9, 2014).
Traynor, I. (2013, November 24). Crisis for Europe hits record low. The Guardian.
World Bank. (1981). Accelerated development in Sub-Saharan Africa: An agenda for action. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Economic Forum. (2008). Africa@Risk: A global risk network briefing. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Cadernos de Estudos Africanos
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Autorizo a publicação do artigo/recensão submetido do qual sou autor.
Declaro ainda que o presente artigo é original, que não foi objecto de qualquer tipo de publicação, e cedo em exclusivo os direitos de publicação à revista Cadernos de Estudos Africanos. A reprodução do artigo, no todo ou em parte, noutras publicações ou noutros suportes depende de autorização prévia da editora Centro de Estudos Internacionais do Iscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa.
