Muscle oxygen saturation and perceived exertion at moderate intensity: a comparative study between treadmill, elliptical, and cycle

Authors

  • Isabel Machado Department of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Vila Real, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2089-6097
  • Daniel Santarém Department of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-9643
  • Catarina Abrantes Department of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Vila Real, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7174-2288

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.31773

Keywords:

Ergometer, constant moderate intensity, muscle oximetry, near-infrared spectroscopy, perceived exertion

Abstract

Muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) is the balance between oxygen supply and demand measured in a local muscle (Pilotto et al., 2022). Understanding the acute dynamic changes in SmO2 and perceived exertion (RPE) in response to different exercise modalities is crucial for optimising exercise prescription and training outcomes. However, the influence of exercise mode on SmO2 and RPE remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the acute SmO2 responses in the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles, and the RPE during treadmill, elliptical and cycle exercises, at identical percentages of heart rate reserve (% HRR).

Fourteen healthy volunteers (8 males/6 females, age:34.9±9.1years) performed exercise on three different ergometers at 50% HRR for 5-minute periods. The Tanaka formula (208-0.7×age) was used to estimate maximal HR. SmO2 was continuously measured using a near-infrared spectroscopy device (MOXY) placed on the GM and VL muscles. A HR monitor (Garmin) was used to assess the cardiovascular intensity during the session, and the RPE was reported immediately after each exercise period using the Borg Scale (6-20). The SmO2-related variables, such as average (SmO2avg), minimum (SmO2min), and variation (ΔSmO2min) were determined. Results showed that for the same cardiovascular effort, a significant effect of exercise mode was found in SmO2avg2(2)=18.436, p<0.001, in GM), SmO2min2(2)=8.769, p=0.012 and χ2(2)=15.857, p<0.001, in VL and GM, respectively), and ΔSmO2min2(2)=8.769, p=0.012 and χ2(2)=15.857, p<0.001, in VL and GM, respectively). All these variables were significantly different between the cycle and treadmill, with lower SmO2min and higher ΔSmO2min values reached during the cycle in the VL (p=0.014, for both variables) while in GM (p<0.001, for both variables), the same results were observed for the opposite (i.e., treadmill). Only GM showed a significantly lower SmO2avg during the treadmill compared to the cycle (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in SmO2-related variables between cycle and elliptical or between elliptical and treadmill in both muscles. RPE was significantly different between exercise modes (χ2(2)=8.857, p=0.012), with a higher RPE in the cycle compared to elliptical (p=0.049) and treadmill (p=0.042). These findings highlight the distinct SmO2 and RPE responses elicited by different exercise modes, even at equal cardiovascular intensity. The cycle exercise induced a higher response of SmO2 in VL, while the treadmill elicited a higher response of SmO2 in the GM muscle. This reinforced the importance of considering exercise mode when designing and optimising training programs to target specific muscle groups and achieve desired physiological responses.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31