Muscle oxygen saturation and perceived exertion at moderate intensity: a comparative study between treadmill, elliptical, and cycle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.31773Keywords:
Ergometer, constant moderate intensity, muscle oximetry, near-infrared spectroscopy, perceived exertionAbstract
Muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) is the balance between oxygen supply and demand measured in a local muscle (Pilotto et al., 2022). Understanding the acute dynamic changes in SmO2 and perceived exertion (RPE) in response to different exercise modalities is crucial for optimising exercise prescription and training outcomes. However, the influence of exercise mode on SmO2 and RPE remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the acute SmO2 responses in the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles, and the RPE during treadmill, elliptical and cycle exercises, at identical percentages of heart rate reserve (% HRR).
Fourteen healthy volunteers (8 males/6 females, age:34.9±9.1years) performed exercise on three different ergometers at 50% HRR for 5-minute periods. The Tanaka formula (208-0.7×age) was used to estimate maximal HR. SmO2 was continuously measured using a near-infrared spectroscopy device (MOXY) placed on the GM and VL muscles. A HR monitor (Garmin) was used to assess the cardiovascular intensity during the session, and the RPE was reported immediately after each exercise period using the Borg Scale (6-20). The SmO2-related variables, such as average (SmO2avg), minimum (SmO2min), and variation (ΔSmO2min) were determined. Results showed that for the same cardiovascular effort, a significant effect of exercise mode was found in SmO2avg (χ2(2)=18.436, p<0.001, in GM), SmO2min (χ2(2)=8.769, p=0.012 and χ2(2)=15.857, p<0.001, in VL and GM, respectively), and ΔSmO2min (χ2(2)=8.769, p=0.012 and χ2(2)=15.857, p<0.001, in VL and GM, respectively). All these variables were significantly different between the cycle and treadmill, with lower SmO2min and higher ΔSmO2min values reached during the cycle in the VL (p=0.014, for both variables) while in GM (p<0.001, for both variables), the same results were observed for the opposite (i.e., treadmill). Only GM showed a significantly lower SmO2avg during the treadmill compared to the cycle (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in SmO2-related variables between cycle and elliptical or between elliptical and treadmill in both muscles. RPE was significantly different between exercise modes (χ2(2)=8.857, p=0.012), with a higher RPE in the cycle compared to elliptical (p=0.049) and treadmill (p=0.042). These findings highlight the distinct SmO2 and RPE responses elicited by different exercise modes, even at equal cardiovascular intensity. The cycle exercise induced a higher response of SmO2 in VL, while the treadmill elicited a higher response of SmO2 in the GM muscle. This reinforced the importance of considering exercise mode when designing and optimising training programs to target specific muscle groups and achieve desired physiological responses.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright of their work.
Upon acceptance for publication, authors grant Sílabas Didáticas, LDA a non-exclusive licence to publish, reproduce, distribute, communicate the article to the public, and identify itself as the original publisher of the article in print and electronic formats, including its indexing and dissemination through databases, repositories, and other scholarly platforms.
All published articles are made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0).
This licence permits non-commercial use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and to Journal Motricidade, and that any changes made are indicated.
Authors may deposit the final published version of the article (Version of Record) in institutional repositories, subject repositories, academic networks, or personal websites, provided that the original publication is properly cited.
