FOOD NEOPHOBIA - IMPORTANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Authors

  • Ana Isabel Silva USF Nova Salus – ACES Grande Porto VIII
  • Andreia Teles S. Pediatria, U. Neonatologia e U. Endocrinologia-Nutrição, CH Vila Nova de Gaia-Espinho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v22.i3.10648

Keywords:

food neophobia, “taste education”

Abstract

Objective: To review the scientiÞ c evidence of the theme Food Neophobias (FN), focus on the most important aspects of their application in clinical practice.

Review methods: A systematic review was performed for papers published between January 2001 to February 2012, in Portuguese/English, in the medical databases Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, evidence-based medicine sites and Physiology text books.

Results: The term FN is defined as a reluctant acceptance of new flavours. The taste for certain foods is a complex process that begins in utero, continues during breastfeeding and remains throughout life. Although there is an influence of genetic factors, these can be contradicted by early and repeated exposure to different flavours, which will modulate the taste and will reduce the risk of future diseases, including childhood obesity. As the window for habituation to new flavours is thin, the rejection of foods introduced after four years is higher. The acceptance of a new flavour up to five years often requires 10 to 15 repeated exposures. Emotions, social aspects and digestive processes, are factors that influence the acquisition of taste.

Conclusions: The gustatory preferences are very stable and can follow up lifelong and we should pay particular attention to children and parents in the “taste education” process. By giving the child some favourite foods with new foods and to stay calm for temporary neophobias, may be the key to the development of taste preferences. The negative reinforcement, such pressures, should be avoided, and the positive reinforcement should be implemented.

References

Guyton A, Hall J. Tratado de Fisiologia Médica, 10ª ed. Guanabara

Koogan; 2002. Cap. 53. p. 571 -4.

Garcia -Bailo B, Toguri C, Eny KM, El -Sohemy A. Genetic variation

in taste and its inß uence on food selection. OMICS A

Journal of Integrative Biology 2009; 13:69 -80.

Feeny E, O´Brien S, Scannell A, Markey A, Gibney E.R. Genetic

variation in taste perception: does it have a role in healthy

eating? Proc Nutr Soc 2011; 70:135 -43.

Mennella JA, Pepino MY, Reed DR. Genetic and environmental

determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.

Pediatrics 2005; 115:e216 -e222 .

Reed DR, Tanaka T, McDaniel AH. Diverse tastes: Genetics of

sweet and bitter perception. Physiol Behav 2006; 88:215 -26.

Mennella JÁ, Jagnow CP, Beauchamp GK. Prenatal and

postnatal ß avor learning by human infants. Pediatrics 2001;

:88 -93.

Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA. Flavor perception in human

infants: development and functional signiÞ cance. Digestion

; 83:1 -6.

Stein LJ, Cowart BJ, Beauchamp GK. Salty taste acceptance

by infants and young children is related to birth weight:

longitudinal analysis of infants within the normal birth weight

range. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006; 60:272 -9.

Gregory JE, Paxton SJ, Brozovic AM. Maternal feeding

practices predict fruit and vegetable consumption in young

children - Results of a 12 -month longitudinal study. Appetite

; 57:167 -72.

Forestell CA, Mennella JA. Early determinants of fruit and vegetable

acceptance. Pediatrics 2007; 120:1247 -54.

Galloway AT, Lee Y, Birch LL. Predictors and consequences

of food neophobia and pickiness in young girls. J Am Diet

Assoc 2003; 103:692 -8.

Schwartz C, Issanchou S, Nicklaus S. Developmental changes

in the acceptance of the Þ ve basic tastes in the Þ rst year

of life. Br J Nutr 2009; 102:1375 -85.

Williams KE, Paul C, Pizzo B, Riegel K. Practice does make

perfect - A longitudinal look at repeated taste exposure. Appetite

; 51:739 -42.

Yeomans MR, Gould NJ, Mobini S, Prescott J. Acquired ß avor

acceptance and intake facilitated by monosodium glutamate

in humans. Physiol Behav 2008; 93:958 -66.

Galloway AT, Fiorito LM, Francis LA, Birch LL. ’Finish your

soup’ - Counterproductive effects of pressuring children to eat

on intake and affect. Appetite 2006; 46:318 -23.

Batsell WR, Brown AS, AnsÞ eld ME, Paschall GY. You will eat

all of that! - A retrospective analysis of forced consumption

episodes. Appetite 2002; 38:211 -9.

Butte N, Cobb K, Dwyer J, Granely L, Heired W, Rickard K.

The start healthy feeding guidelines for infants and toddlers.

J Am Diet Assoc 2004; 104:442 -54.

Addessi E, Galloway AT, Visalberghi E, Birch LL. Speci-

Þ c social inß uences on the acceptance of novel foods in

–5 -year -old children. Appetite 2005; 45:264 -71.

Salvy SJ, Vartanian LR, Coelho JS, Jarrin D, Pliner P. The

role of familiarity on modeling of eating and food consumption

in children. Appetite 2008; 50:524 -8.

Published

2017-01-16

How to Cite

Silva, A. I., & Teles, A. (2017). FOOD NEOPHOBIA - IMPORTANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. NASCER E CRESCER - BIRTH AND GROWTH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 22(3), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v22.i3.10648

Issue

Section

Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)