BRAIN MAGNETIC RESONANCE EVALUATION AND PUBERTAL DEVELOPMENT VARIATIONS AMONG FEMALE ADOLESCENTS

Authors

  • Paula Fonseca Department of Pediatrics, Unidade de Vila Nova Famalicão, Centro Hospitalar Médio Ave
  • Daniela Seixas Department of Experimental Biology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto; Department of Imaging, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho
  • Helena Fonseca Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa
  • Sofia Brandão Magnetic Ressonance Unit, Centro Hospitalar São João
  • Manuel Fontoura Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v26.i1.11801

Keywords:

Adolescence, brain development, magnetic resonance imaging, neuroimaging, puberty

Abstract

Aim: There is evidence that adolescents with distinct rhythms of pubertal maturation have different psychosocial behaviours. However, a relation between pubertal maturation and the development of the prefrontal cortex and limbic system was not yet established. The aim of this study was to apply brain magnetic resonance imaging to investigate brain development of teenagers with similar age but distinct timing of pubertal maturation.

Methods: We compared the hormonal profiles and brain structure and volume using magnetic resonance imaging of two groups of 14 year-old girls, four with an early pubertal development (group 1) and three with an average pubertal development (group 2).

Results: The age at onset of puberty was the only biological variable that distinguished the two groups (p = 0,05). There were no differences regarding global brain volume. However, early-maturers showed a tendency for an increased volume of all subcortical structures except for nucleus accumbens.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first work to address the relation of pubertal maturation timing and central nervous system development using brain magnetic resonance imaging. The observed tendency for an increased volume of the subcortical structures may be related to a possible delayed development of the nucleus accumbens in early-maturers, and may explain the increased vulnerability of this group to risk behaviours.

References

Bordini B, Rosenfield RL. Normal pubertal development: Part I: The endocrine basis of puberty. Pediatr Rev 2011; 32: 223-9.

Neinstein L. Adolescent health care – A pratical guide. 5th edition. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. Philadelphia. 2008, pp 3-31.

Patton GC, Viner R. Pubertal transitions in Health. Lancet 2007; 369: 1130-7.

Vigil P, Orellana RF, Cortes ME, Molina CT, Switzer BE, Klaus H. Endocrine modulation of the brain: A review. J Pediatr Adoles Gynecol 2011; 24(6): 330-7.

Rosenfield R. Normal Pubertal Development: Part II: Clinical aspects of puberty. Pediatr Rev 2011; 32: 281-91.

Hazen E, Schlozman S, Beresin E. Adolescent Psychological Development: A review. Pediatr Rev 2008; 29: 161-8.

Spear LP. The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000; 24: 417-63.

Romer D. Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity and brain development: Implications for prevention. Dev Psychobiol 2010; 52: 263-76.

Ge X, Conger RD, Jr Glen HE. Coming of age too early: pubertal influences on girls` vulnerability to psychological distress. Child Dev 1996; 67: 3386-400.

Graber JA, Levinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Brooks-Gunn J. Is Psychopathology associated with the timing of pubertal development? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36:1768-76.

Sisk CL, Zehr JL. Pubertal Hormones organize the adolescent brain and behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 2005; 26: 163-74.

Neufang S, Specht K, Hausmann M, Gurturkun O, Herpertez-Dahlmann B, Fink G et al. Sex differences and the impact of steroid hormones on the developing human brain. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19: 464-73.

Blakmore SJ, Burnett S, Dahl RE. The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 926-33.

Kaplowitz PB. Delayed Puberty. Pediatric Rev 2010; 31: 189-95.

Jonhson SB, Blum R, Giedd J. Adolescent Maturity and the Brain: The promise and Pitfalls of Neuroscience Research in Adolescent Health Policy. J Adolesc Health 2009; 45: 216-21.

Blakemore SJ. The social brain in adolescence. Nature Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 267-77.

Giedd JN. The Teen Brain: Insights from Neuroimaging. J Adolesc Health 2008; 42: 335-343.

Giedd JN, Stockman M, Weddle C, Liverpool M, Alexander-Bloch A, Wallace GL, et al. Anatomic magnetic resonance imaging of developing and adolescent brain and effects of genetic variation. Neuropsychol Rev 2010; 20: 349-61.

Luna B, Padmanabhan A, O’Hearn K. What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain Cogn 2010; 72: 101-13.

Burnett S, Sebastian C, Kadosh KC, Blakemore SJ. The social brain in adolescence: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011; 35: 1654-64.

WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. October 2013. [Cited 2014 november 11]. Available from URL: www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ .

Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 782-90.

Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, Behrens T, et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 2009; 45: S173-86.

Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 208-19.

Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 7: 43-55.

Smith SM, De Stefano N, Jenkinson M, Matthews P.M. Normalised accurate measurement of longitudinal brain change. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 466-75.

Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy DN, Jenkinson M. A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 2011; 56: 907-22.

Costa VD, Lang PJ, Sabatinelli D, Versace F, Bradley MM. Emotional imagery: Assessing pleasure and arousal in the brain’s reward circuitry. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31: 1446–57.

Bramen JE, Hranilovich JA, Dahl RE, Forbes EE, Chen J, et al. Puberty influences medial temporal lobe and cortical gray matter maturation differently in boys than girls matched for sexual maturity. Cereb Cortex 2011; 21: 636-46.

Koolschijn PCMP, Peper JS, Crone EA. The Influence of Sex Steroids on Structural Brain Maturation in Adolescence. Plos One 2014; 9: e83929.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-03

How to Cite

Fonseca, P., Seixas, D., Fonseca, H., Brandão, S., & Fontoura, M. (2017). BRAIN MAGNETIC RESONANCE EVALUATION AND PUBERTAL DEVELOPMENT VARIATIONS AMONG FEMALE ADOLESCENTS. NASCER E CRESCER - BIRTH AND GROWTH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 26(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v26.i1.11801

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)