Transconjunctival Scleral Fixation of Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene by Microincision

Authors

  • Gabriel Morgado Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal; School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal; Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
  • Marina João Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal; School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • Jorge Costa Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal; School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • Tiago Monteiro Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal; School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • Fernando Faria-Correia Ophthalmology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal; School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.25939

Keywords:

Anterior Chamber/surgery, Intraocular Pressure, Lens Capsule, Crystalline, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Suture Techniques

Abstract

Introduction: This study presents a new minimally invasive transconjunctival surgical technique for fixation of a hydrophilic acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) at 4 different points, in the absence of capsular support, using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE, Gore) thread -Tex®).

Methods: The technique described was used in 26 eyes, without capsular support, of 26 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. The following variables were evaluated: age, sex, indication for surgery, intraocular pressure (IOP), distance corrected visual acuity (AVCC) before and after surgery, postoperative spherical equivalent (EE), centering and tilt of the IOL, surgically induced astigmatism (AIC), combined procedures, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and follow-up time after surgery.

Results: The mean age of patients was 77.62 ± 12.23 years; the mean follow-up was 20.2 ± 9.30 months. Stroke improved after surgery, from logMAR 0.43 ± 0.25 to 0.13 ± 0.08 (p = 0.010). No patient lost visual acuity lines on the Snellen chart. Mean postoperative EE was -0.28 ± 0.26 diopters; the mean AIC of 0.24 ± 0.16 diopters was obtained after a limbal incision of 2.0 or 2.2 mm. In five patients with prior uncontrolled glaucoma, simultaneous glaucoma surgery was performed. As postoperative complications, we observed two cases of ocular hypertension (both in patients with previous glaucoma) and one case (3.8%) of non-surgically resolved hemovitreous. In no case was observed pseudophacodonesis, decentering or “tilt” of the IOL, pupillary optical capture, pigment dispersion or other postoperative complications.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that this technique represents a minimally invasive procedure for scleral lens fixation, which significantly reduces the morbidity associated with scleral suspension techniques, increasing its safety and reproducibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Toro MD, Longo A, Avitabile T, Nowomiejska K, Gagliano C, Tripodi S, et al. Five-year follow-up of secondary iris-claw intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of aphakia: Anterior chamber versus retropupillary implantation. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214140.

Hennig A, Evans JR, Pradhan D, Johnson GJ, Pokhrel RP, Gregson RM, et al. Randomised controlled trial of anterior-chamber intraocular lenses. Lancet. 1997;349:1129-33

Khan MA, Gerstenblith AT, Dollin ML, Gupta OP, Spirn MJ. Scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses using gore-tex suture with concurrent 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Retina. 2014;34:1477-80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000233.

Khan MA, Gupta OP, Smith RG, Ayres BD, Raber IM, Bailey RS, et al. Scleral fixation of intraocular lenses using Gore-Tex suture: clinical outcomes and safety profile. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:638–43. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306839.5. Yamane S, Sato S, Maruyama-Inoue M, Kadonosono K. Flanged intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation with double-needle technique. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1136–42.

Gabor SG, Pavilidis MM. Sutureless intrascleral posterior chamber intraocular lens fixation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:1851–54.

Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Jacob S, Baid C, Agarwal A, Srinivasan S. Fibrin glue-assisted sutureless posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in eyes with deficient posterior capsules. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1433–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.040.

Cutler NE, Sridhar J, Khan MA, Gupta OP, Fineman MS. Transconjunctival Approach to Scleral Fixation of Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Using Gore-Tex Suture. Retina. 2017; 37:1003–5. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001333.

Por YM, Lavin MJ. Techniques of intraocular lens suspension in the absence of capsular/zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:429-62.

Jacob S, Kumar DA, Rao NK. Scleral fixation of intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31:50-60.

Tong JY, Dunn HP, Hopley C. Yamane technique modification for intrascleral haptic extrusion. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;48:8478.

Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M. Outcomes of Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Coaxial Phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 1997–2003.

Masket S, Wang L, Belani S. Induced astigmatism with 2.2- and 3.0-mm coaxial phacoemulsification incisions. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:21-4.

Kim YK, Kim YW, Woo SJ, Park KH. Comparison of surgically-induced astigmatism after combined phacoemulsification and 23-gauge vitrectomy: 2.2-mm vs. 2.75-mm cataract surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014;28:130-7.

Vote BJ Tranos P, Bunce C, Kaneko KN. Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.034.

Chee SP, Chan NS. Suture snare technique for scleral fixation of intraocular lenses and capsular tension devices. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;0:1–3.

Pollmann AS, Lewis DR, Gupta RR. Structural integrity of intraocular lenses with eyelets in a model of transscleral fixation with the Gore-Tex suture. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:617-21.

Rubin U, Baker CF. Akreos lens opacification under silicone oil. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53:e188–e190.

Kalevar A, Dollin M, Gupta RR. Opacification of scleral-sutured Akreos AO60 intraocular lens after vitrectomy with gas tamponade: case series. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2020;14:174-7.

Yang J, Wang X, Zhang H, Pang Y, Wei RH. Clinical evaluation of surgery-induced astigmatism in cataract surgery using 2.2 mm or 1.8 mm clear corneal micro-incisions. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10:68-71. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.11.21. Mencucci R, Dei R, Danielli D, Susini M, Menchini U. Folding procedure for acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:457–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.025.

Can E, Basaran R, Gul A, Birinci H. Scleral fixation of one piece intraocular lens by injector implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:857–60.

Botsford BW, Williams AM, Conner IP, Martel JN, Eller AW. Scleral fixation of intraocular lenses with Gore-Tex suture: refractive outcomes and comparison of lens power formulas. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019;3:468-472.

Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Intraocular lens tilt and decentration, anterior chamber depth, and refractive error after trans-scleral suture fixation surgery. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:878-82. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00504-7.

Fass ON, Herman WK. Four-point suture scleral fixation of a hydrophilic acrylic IOL in aphakic eyes with insufficient capsule support. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:991-6.

Donaldson KE, Gorscak JJ, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Benz MS, Forster RK. Anterior chamber and sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses in eyes with poor capsular support. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:903–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.061.

Terveen DC, Fram NR, Ayres B, Berdahl JP. Small-incision 4-point scleral suture fixation of a foldable hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens in the absence of capsule support. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:211-6.

Gonnermann J, K J Klamann MKJ, Maier AK, Rjasanow J, Joussen AM, Bertelmann E, et al. Visual outcome and complications after posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:2139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.035.

Goel N. Clinical outcomes of combined pars plana vitrectomy and trans-scleral 4-point suture fixation of a foldable intraocular lens. Eye. 2018;32:1055-61.

Scharioth GB, Prasad S, Georgalas I, Tataru C, Pavlidis M. Intermediate results of sutureless intrascleral posterior chamber intraocular lens fixation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:254-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.024.

Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Packiyalakshmi S, Jacob S, Agarwal A. Complications and visual outcomes after glued foldable intraocular lens implantation in eyes with inadequate capsules. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1211-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.004.

Asif MI, Bafna RK, Kapoor A, Sharma N. Intrascleral haptic fixation for haptic exposure after Yamane technique. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14:e243627.

Canabrava SF, Rabelo NN, de Sousa Lima JL . Exposed polypropylene flange in the Canabrava double-flanged polypropylene technique. JCRS Online Case Rep. 2021; 9:4.

Cayatopa FS, Mendez AG, Ortiz RB, Cueva SS. Late Endophthalmitis Associated with Haptic Exposure After an Intrascleral Fixation Yamane Technique. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;12:874.

Roditi E, Brosh K, Assayag E, Weill Y. Endophtalmitis associated with flange exposure after a 4-flanged canabrava fixation technique. JCRS Online Case Rep. 2021; 9: 45. doi: 0.1097/j.jcro.0000000000000042

Baykara M, Ozcetin H, Yilmaz S, Timuc OB. Posterior iris fixation of the iris-claw intraocular lens implantation through a scleral tunnel incision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 144:586–91.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Morgado, G., João, M., Costa, J., Monteiro, T., & Faria-Correia, F. (2021). Transconjunctival Scleral Fixation of Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene by Microincision . Revista Sociedade Portuguesa De Oftalmologia, 45(4), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.25939

Issue

Section

Original Article