Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric Patients: Ten Year Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.25976Keywords:
Child, Cross-Linking Reagents, Keratoconus, PhotochemotherapyAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Keratoconus (KC) is a corneal ectatic disorder characterized by pro- gressive corneal thinning and steepening. Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) uses riboflavin and ultraviolet-A radiation to induce cross-links in the stromal collagen, increasing its biomechanical rigidity and halting the progression of KC. Different protocols of CXL have been proposed throughout the years to improve clinical results and patient comfort. However, management of pediatric cases remains particularly challenging because younger patients tend to exhibit a more rapid progression of the disease. In this study we aim to evaluate the efficacy of CXL in a population of pediatric patients aged 18 years or less with progressive KC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multi-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Patients with progressive KC, aged ≤ 18, who underwent CXL between 2010 and 2021 were reviewed. Different modalities of CXL were used: Standard CXL, Accelerated CXL, Combined CXL and partial topography-guided PRK (photorefractive keratectomy), and Customized CXL. Evaluation included best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and Scheimpflugtomography evaluation. Baseline and follow-up values were compared.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The study included 44 eyes of 33 patients, 26 (78.8%) male and 7 (21.2%) female. Mean age at time of CXL was 15.2±3.1 years [range 10-18]. Convention- al CXL was performed in 9 eyes, and accelerated CXL in 14 eyes. Seven eyes performed combined CXL and simultaneous topography guided PRK. Fourteen eyes performed customized irradiation CXL. Epithelium was removed before CXL in all patients. Mean follow-up was 21.9±16.6 months [range 4-66]. At the last follow-up, mean BSCVA was improved from 0.43±0.26 to 0.38±0.25 Log- MAR (p=0.067). Preoperative mean spherical equivalent increased from -1.97±2.44 to -2.41±3.60 D (p=0.509) and cylinder decreased from 2.85±1.92 to 2.34±1.77 D (p=0.045). The flat keratometric values (K1) remained stable, from 48.04±4.87 to 48.74±5.12 D (p=0.358), as well as the steep keratometric values (K2), from 53.63±6.60 to 53.98±6.09 D (p=0.721), and maximum keratometry values (K max), from 62.45±10.38 to 62.20±10.01 D (p=0.764). Thinnest corneal thickness decreased from 452.03±39.63 to 423.59±43.17 μm (p<0.001). Mean spherical equivalent increased in conventional CXL eyes, and had a greater decrease in those having undergone combined CXL and PRK (p=0.042). Thinnest corneal thickness decreased more significantly in the combined CXL and PRK eyes (p<0.001). No other differences between different CXL protocols were significant. Success rate at the last follow-up was 90.9%, with 4 eyes (9.1%) showing progression after CXL: 2 following accelerated CXL and 2 following customized irradiation CXL.
CONCLUSION: CXL seems to halt the progression of KC in pediatric patients and result in stabilization of visual acuity and topographic parameters. Our results are in line with the published international series for pediatric KC, showing overall good results but more risk of progression than adult patients. Alternative protocols seem to be equally effective as standard-CXL in pediatric KC.
Downloads
References
Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297- 319. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7.
Ferdi AC, Nguyen V, Gore DM, Allan BD, Rozema JJ, Watson SL. Keratoconus Natural Progression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 11 529 Eyes. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:935-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.02.029.
Ertan A, Muftuoglu O. Keratoconus clinical findings according to different age and gender groups. Cornea. 2008;27:1109- 13. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31817f815a.
Ozer MD, Batur M, Mesen S, Tekın S, Seven E, Yasar T. Comparison of the efficacy of accelerated corneal cross-linking therapy in different pediatric age groups having progressive keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40:2651-8. doi: 10.1007/ s10792-020-01446-w.
Léoni-Mesplié S, Mortemousque B, Touboul D, Malet F, Praud D, Mesplié N, et al. Scalability and severity of keratoconus in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:56-62.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.01.025.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A- induced cross-linking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1780-5. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00407-3.
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a- induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:620-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(02)02220-1.
Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Bagaglia S, Caporossi O, Villano A, et al. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking With Riboflavin and Ultraviolet A Light for Pediatric Keratoconus: Ten-Year Results. Cornea. 2018;37:560-6. doi: 10.1097/ ICO.0000000000001505.
Raiskup F, Theuring A, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Corneal col- lagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: ten-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.033.
Kobashi H, Hieda O, Itoi M, Kamiya K, Kato N, Shimazaki J, et al. Corneal Cross-Linking for Paediatric Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2626. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122626.
Godefrooij DA, Soeters N, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Corneal Cross-Linking for Pediatric Keratoconus: Long-Term Results. Cornea. 2016;35:954-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000819.
Chatzis N, Hafezi F. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of pediatric [corrected] corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;28(11):753-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20121011-01.
Padmanabhan P, Rachapalle Reddi S, Rajagopal R, Natarajan R, Iyer G, Srinivasan B, et al. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients-Long-Term Results. Cor- nea. 2017;36:138-43. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001102.
Ulusoy DM, Göktaş E, Duru N, Özköse A, Ataş M, Yuvacı İ, et al. Accelerated corneal crosslinking for treatment of progressive keratoconus in pediatric patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27:319-25. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000848.
Vinciguerra P, Albé E, Frueh BE, Trazza S, Epstein D. Two-year corneal cross-linking results in patients younger than 18 years with documented progressive keratoconus. Am J Oph- thalmol. 2012;154:520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.020.
Holopainen JM, Krootila K. Transient corneal thinning in eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:533-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.023.
Greenstein SA, Shah VP, Fry KL, Hersh PS. Corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:691-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.052.
Ozgurhan EB, Kara N, Cankaya KI, Kurt T, Demirok A. Accelerated corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients with keratoconus: 24-month outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:843-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20141120-01.
Sarac O, Caglayan M, Uysal BS, Uzel AGT, Tanriverdi B, Cagil N. Accelerated versus standard corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus patients: 24 months follow-up results. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41:442-7. doi: 10.1016/j. clae.2018.06.001.
Baenninger PB, Bachmann LM, Wienecke L, Thiel MA, Kaufmann C. Pediatric Corneal Cross-linking: Comparison of Visual and Topographic Outcomes Between Conventional and Accelerated Treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.015.
Kanellopoulos AJ, Vingopoulos F, Sideri AM. Long-Term Stability With the Athens Protocol (Topography-Guided Partial PRK Combined With Cross-Linking) in Pediatric Patients With Keratoconus. Cornea. 2019;38:1049-57. doi: 10.1097/ ICO.0000000000001996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Do not forget to download the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication and Conflict of Interest.
The article can only be submitted with these two documents.
To obtain the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication file, click here.
To obtain the Conflict of Interest file (ICMJE template), click here