Intraocular Foreign Bodies: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors for Visual Outcomes

Authors

  • André Ferreira Service of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; Unit of Anatomy, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-5128
  • Bruno Barbosa Ribeiro Service of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-9101
  • João Coelho Service of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2261-5682
  • Angelina Meireles Service of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; Department of Ophthalmology, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9148-2786

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.28266

Keywords:

Eye Foreign Bodies, Eye Injuries, Penetrating, Treatment Outcome, Vitrectomy

Abstract

Introduction: Our objective was to evaluate the clinical presentation of patients with intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB) and establish prognostic factors for visual outcomes.
Methods: Medical records of all patients undergoing surgery for an intraocular foreign body at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António in the last decade were retrospectively reviewed.
Results: This study included 108 eyes of 107 patients. Most patients were adult males (88.9%) of working age (88.9% were 18-64 years old). Retinal lesions were documented in 40.7% of the eyes and 17 (15.7%) eyes presented with retinal detachment. Seven (6.5%) eyes presented with endophthalmitis. The majority (78.7%) of IOFB were metallic and entered the globe mainly through the cornea (68.5%). The median (interquartile range) time to first procedure was 1 (0-2) days, with most IOFB (72.2%), retrieved at that moment. Pars plana vitrectomy were performed in 74 eyes. In this study, good presenting visual acuity (VA), lens sparing, absence of hyphema and retinal detachment and the presence of vitreous hemorrhage were associated with good final VA.
Conclusion: Open-globe injuries with IOFB are a public health issue that impose preventable social and economic burden as it affects mostly working-age subjects. Hence, early intervention and preventive measure are of uttermost importance to prevent social and visual disability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jung HC, Lee SY, Yoon CK, Park UC, Heo JW, Lee EK. Intraocular foreign body: diagnostic protocols and treatment strategies in ocular trauma patients. J Clin Med. 2021;10. doi:10.3390/jcm10091861

Anguita R, Moya R, Saez V, Bhardwaj G, Salinas A, Kobus R, et al. Clinical presentations and surgical outcomes of intraocular foreign body presenting to an ocular trauma unit. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259:263-8. doi:10.1007/ s00417-020-04859-6

Liu CC, Tong JM, Li PS, Li KK. Epidemiology and clinical outcome of intraocular foreign bodies in Hong Kong: a 13-year review. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37:55-61. doi:10.1007/s10792- 016-0225-4

Patel SN, Langer PD, Zarbin MA, Bhagat N. Diagnostic value of clinical examination and radiographic imaging in identification of intraocular foreign bodies in open globe injury. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22:259-68. doi:10.5301/EJO.2011.8347

Erakgun T, Egrilmez S. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies. J Trauma. 2008;64:1034-7. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318047dff4

Imrie FR, Cox A, Foot B, Macewen CJ. Surveillance of intraocular foreign bodies in the UK. Eye. 2008;22:1141-7. doi:10.1038/ sj.eye.6702868

Forrest KY, Cali JM. Epidemiology of lifetime work-related eye injuries in the U.S. population associated with one or more lost days of work. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16:156- 62. doi:10.1080/09286580902738175

Coelho J, Ferreira A, Kuhn F, Meireles A. Globe ruptures: outcomes and prognostic analysis of severe ocular trauma. Ophthalmologica. 2022;245:376-84. doi:10.1159/000523705

Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, Mester V, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. The Ocular Trauma Score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002;15:163-5, vi. doi:10.1016/s0896-1549(02)00007-x

Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P Jr, Aaberg TM Sr, Bridges WZ Jr, Capone A Jr, Cardillo JA, et al. A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe). The Ocular Trauma Classification Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:820-31. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71132-8

Liu Y, Wang S, Li Y, Gong Q, Su G, Zhao J. Intraocular foreign bodies: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing visual outcome and globe survival in 373 eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:5208092. doi:10.1155/2019/5208092

Kuhn F, Morris R. Early vitrectomy for severe eye injuries. Eye. 2021;35:1288-9. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-01308-w

Victor AA, Violetta L, Kusumowidagdo G, Pranata R. Parsplana vitrectomy combined with retinectomy in severe openglobe injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32:1652-61. doi:10.1177/11206721211029472

Ferreira N, Monteiro S, Meireles A, Kuhn F. Outcome of vitrectomy and chorioretinectomy in perforating eye injuries. Ophthalmic Res. 2015;53:200-6. doi:10.1159/000371494

Monteiro S, Meireles A. Prophylactic Chorioretinectomy in Open Ocular Trauma: A Series of 36 Eyes. Ophthalmologica. 2018;240:55-60. doi:10.1159/000486549

Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, , Mieler WF, Liggett PE. Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1468-74. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31454-5.

Nicoara SD, Irimescu I, Calinici T, Cristian C. Intraocular foreign bodies extracted by pars plana vitrectomy: clinical char- acteristics, management, outcomes and prognostic factors. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:151. doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0128-6

Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, Lewis H. Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:911-6.

Thompson WS, Rubsamen PE, Flynn Jr HW, Schiffman J, Cousins SW. Endophthalmitis after penetrating trauma: risk factors and visual acuity outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1696-701. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30807-x.

El-Asrar AM, Al-Amro SA, Khan NM, Kangave D. Visual outcome and prognostic factors after vitrectomy for posterior segment foreign bodies. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000;10:304-11. doi:10.1177/112067210001000406

Zhang Y, Zhang M, Jiang C, Qiu HY. Intraocular foreign bodies in china: clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and visual outcomes in 1,421 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:66-73 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.014

Colyer MH, Weber ED, Weichel ED, Dick JS, Bower KS, Ward TP, et al. Delayed intraocular foreign body removal without endophthalmitis during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1439-47. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.052

Ehlers JP, Kunimoto DY, Ittoop S, Maguire JI, Ho AC, Regillo CD Metallic intraocular foreign bodies: characteristics, interventions, and prognostic factors for visual outcome and globe survival. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:427-33. doi:10.1016/j. ajo.2008.05.021

Downloads

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Ferreira, A., Barbosa Ribeiro, B., Coelho, J., & Meireles, A. . (2023). Intraocular Foreign Bodies: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors for Visual Outcomes. Revista Sociedade Portuguesa De Oftalmologia, 47(3), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.28266

Issue

Section

Original Article