Glaucoma Virtual Monitoring Clinic: Development and Implementation in a Portuguese Public Hospital

Authors

  • Catarina Cunha Ferreira Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4356-9112
  • Joana Silva Fernandes Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-9535
  • Pedro Martins Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4872-9058
  • Eduardo Saraiva Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
  • Joaquim Sequeira Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
  • Dália Meira Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-0621

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.28286

Keywords:

Glaucoma, Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration, Referral and Consultation, Remote Consultation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A virtual clinic is a new model of glaucoma care in which the ophthalmologist is removed from the face-to-face patient consultation. Virtual glaucoma services are intended to improve both patients’ experiences and clinics’ capacity. In this study, we describe the development of a glaucoma virtual monitoring clinic within a public hospital of the Portuguese national healthcare service and describe its implementation outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective, service evaluation study was performed including patients referred for an in-house glaucoma monitoring service structured as an asynchronous virtual clinic at the Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal. Consecutive patients with stable disease and low risk of glaucoma progression were considered for enrolment. Feasibility of development of the glaucoma virtual clinic (GVC), improvement of patient journey times, and patients’ experiences at the service were studied.
RESULTS: A total of 177 patients attended the GVC during its first year of activity. The most prevalent diagnosis were primary open-angle glaucoma (50.3%) and ocular hypertension (26.0%). The journey time at the GVC had an average reduction of 37.8% when compared to the conventional clinic (56 minutes vs 90 minutes, respectively, p<0.001). Most patients (88.7%) attending the GVC were subsequently scheduled for a follow-up visit at an adequate monitoring interval. Twenty patients were referred for an anticipated face-to-face appointment. Evaluation of patients’ experiences showed high levels of satisfaction with the service. Patient–doctor relationship, previous experience of care within the hospital, level of information about the disease status, and knowledge about the GVC were found to be important factors for acceptance of this model of care. Greater efficiency and less waiting times at the appointment were pointed by patients as strengths of the GVC.
CONCLUSION: Virtual monitoring services are a clinically efficient, alternative model for glaucoma care within the hospital setting. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility of implementing this model of care in our ophthalmology service and reported a decrease of patient journey time, a low rate of referral back to face-to-face appointments, and high levels of patient acceptance and satisfaction in the virtual glaucoma monitoring clinic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:389-93. doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389

Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081-90. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

Conlon R, Saheb H, Ahmed II. Glaucoma treatment trends: a review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52:114-24. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.07.013.

Conlon R, Saheb H, Ahmed II. Glaucoma treatment trends: a review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52:114-24. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.07.013.

Chalk D, Smith M. Guidelines on glaucoma and the demand for services. Br J Healthc Manag. 2013;19:476–81. doi:10.12968/bjhc.2013.19.10.476

Smith R. Our Ophthalmology Service is “Failing”, Please Help! Professional Standards Committee; 2013. [accessed Sep 2022] Available from: https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/2013_PROF_244_Our-ophthalmology-service-is-failing-please-help.pdf

MacEwen C. Eye risk from ’overstretched NHS’. BBC News; 2016. [accessed Sep 2022] Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35743550

National Institute of Clinical Excellence. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidance CG85 Glaucoma: Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. London; 2009. [accessed Sep 2022] Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg85/chapter/guidance

Malik R, Baker H, Russell RA, Crabb DP. A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002067. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002067

Kotecha A, Baldwin A, Brookes J, Foster PJ. Experiences with developing and implementing a virtual clinic for glaucoma care in an NHS setting. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1915-23. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92409

Kotecha A, Bonstein K, Cable R, Cammack J, Clipston J, Foster P. Qualitative investigation of patients’ experience of a glaucoma virtual clinic in a specialist ophthalmic hospital in London, UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5;e009463. doi:10.1136/bmj-open-2015-009463

Gunn PJG, Marks JR, Au L, Read S, Waterman H, Spry PGD, et al. Virtual clinics for glaucoma care - Patients’ and clinicians’ experiences and perceptions: a qualitative evaluation. Eye. 2022;36:209-18. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01467-4

Huang OS, Chew ACY, Finkelstein EA, Wong TT, Lamoureux EL. Outcomes of an Asynchronous Virtual Glaucoma Clinic in Monitoring Patients at Low Risk of Glaucoma Progression in Singapore. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2021;10:328-34. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000402

Clarke J, Puertas R, Kotecha A, Foster PJ, Barton K. Virtual clinics in glaucoma care: face-to-face versus remote decision-making. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:892-95. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308993

Trikha S, Macgregor C, Jeffery M, Kirwan J. The Portsmouthbased glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future? Eye. 2012;26:1288-94. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.120

Wright HR, Diamond JP. Service innovation in glaucoma management: using a Web-based electronic patient record to facilitate virtual specialist supervision of a shared care glaucoma programme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:313-7. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305588.

Court JH, Austin MW. Virtual glaucoma clinics: patient acceptance and quality of patient education compared to standard clinics. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;24;9:745-9. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S75000

Nikita E, Gazzard G, Sim DA, Fasolo S, Kortum K, Jayaram H. Expansion of patient eligibility for virtual glaucoma clinics: a long-term strategy to increase the capacity of high-quality glaucoma care. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;28:bjophthalmol-2020-318556. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318556

Simons AS, Vercauteren J, Barbosa-Breda J, Stalmans I. Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting. J Clin Med. 2021;19;10:4785. doi:10.3390/jcm10204785

Kotecha A, Longstaff S, Azuara-Blanco A, Kirwan JF, Morgan JE, et al. Developing standards for the development of glaucoma virtual clinics using a modified Delphi approach. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:531-4. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310504

European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:1-169. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines

Anderson RD, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis:Mosby;1999.

Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:91-6.

Kotecha A, Turner S, Vasilakis C, Utley M, Fulop N, Azuara-Blanco A, et al. Improving care and increasing efficiency-challenges in the care of chronic eye diseases. Eye. 2014;28:779-83. doi:10.1038/eye.2014.135

Simons AS, Vercauteren J, Barbosa-Breda J, Stalmans I. Shared Care and Virtual Clinics for Glaucoma in a Hospital Setting. J Clin Med. 2021;19;10:4785. doi:10.3390/jcm10204785

Strouthidis NG, Chandrasekharan G, Diamond JP, Murdoch IE. Teleglaucoma: ready to go? Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1605-11. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304133

Downloads

Published

2024-03-24

How to Cite

Cunha Ferreira, C., Silva Fernandes, J., Martins, P., Saraiva, E., Sequeira, J., & Meira, D. (2024). Glaucoma Virtual Monitoring Clinic: Development and Implementation in a Portuguese Public Hospital. Revista Sociedade Portuguesa De Oftalmologia, 48(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.28286

Issue

Section

Original Article