The Relationship between Patient’s Personality and Satisfaction After Multifocal Intraocular Lens: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.29346Keywords:
Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Patient Satisfaction, PersonalityAbstract
Introduction: Multifocal intraocular lens (mIOL) are frequently associated with unwanted optical phenomena, which contributes to patient dissatisfaction after cataract surgery and mIOL. Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly valued in postoperative evaluation after mIOL, and individual tolerance to glare and halos could be intimately related to personality. Our purpose was to perform a systematic review of the best-available evidence on the relationship between patients’ personality traits and postoperative satisfaction after bilateral cataract surgery with a multifocal intraocular lens (mIOL).Methods: We conducted a systematic review using the Cochrane methodology and reported findings according to PRISMA. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase and Web of Science. Three studies were included according to the following criteria: patients submitted to cataract surgery and bilateral implantation of mIOL, including toric lenses; patients who underwent psychological assessment and filled a questionnaire on self-perceived quality of vision (QoV) or postoperative satisfaction.
Results: All authors found a correlation between personality traits and subjective perception of photic phenomena and dissatisfaction. Two of the authors concluded that high neuroticism was associated with low postoperative satisfaction, whereas conscientiousness was associated with optimal satisfaction rates. All authors used personality questionnaires based on the NEO Five-Factor Model, although one of the authors used different labels for major personality taxonomies.
Conclusion: Based on this review, there is relationship between personality and postoperative satisfaction after mIOL and thus, an evaluation of patients’ personality is an important part of the criteria for patient counseling before mIOL.
Downloads
References
Wang SY, Stem MS, Oren G, Shtein R, Lichter PR. Patient-centered and visual quality outcomes of premium cataract surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27:387-401. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000978.
Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Muzyka-Woźniak M. Methods for evaluating quality of life and vision in patients undergoing lens refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257:1091-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04270-w
Woods RL, Colvin CR, Vera-Diaz FA, Peli E. A relationship between tolerance of blur and personality. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6077-82. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-5013
Yeu E, Cuozzo S. Matching the Patient to the Intraocular Lens: Preoperative Considerations to Optimize Surgical Outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:e132-41.
Abdullahi AM, Orji R, Rabiu AM, Kawu AA. Personality and Subjective Well-Being: Towards Personalized Persuasive Interventions for Health and Well-Being. Online J Public Health Inform. 2020;12:e1. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v12i1.10335
Birkeland S, Bismark M, Barry MJ, Möller S. Personality characteristics associated with satisfaction with healthcare and the wish to complain. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1305. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08688-7
Gong L, Dong JY. Patient’s personality predicts recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:263-9. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0505-z.
du Toit R, Ferreira JT, Nel ZJ. Visual and nonvisual variables implicated in monovision wear. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:11925. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199802000-00015
Erickson DB, Erickson P. Psychological factors and sex differences in acceptance of monovision. Percept Mot Skills. 2000;91:1113-9. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.3f.1113
de la Jara PL, Erickson D, Erickson P, Stapleton F. Pre-operative Quality of Life and psychological factors that influence patient decision making in LASIK. Eye. 2010;24:270-5. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.115
Erickson DB, Ryan RA, Erickson P, Aquavella JV. Cognitive styles and personality characteristics strongly influence the decision to have photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 1995;11:267-74; discussion 274-81. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X- 19950701-11
Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S, Foster G, Henderson BA, Hill W, et. al; ASCRS Cataract Clinical Committee. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:313-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.011
Deshpande R, Mangiraj V, Deshpande M, Dole K, Bharucha K, Sanghavi N. A clinical study to assess feasibility, acceptance, and outcome of multifocal intraocular lens in patients with bilateral immature cataract at a tertiary eye care insti- tute. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:2421-6. doi: 10.4103/ijo. IJO_1951_19
Henderson B, Sharif Z, Geneva I. Presbyopia correcting IOLs: patient selection and satisfaction. In: Randleman B, Ahmed IIK, editors. Intraocular Lens Surgery: Selection, Complications, and Complex Cases. New York: Thieme Medical; 2016.p.72–7.
Chang, D. Multifocal Intraocular Lenses—Patient Selection and Managing Expectations. US Ophthalmic Rev. 2007;2:40-1 doi:10.17925/USOR.2007.02.00.40
Dell S.J. The new Dell questionnaire. Online Referencing. [accessed Dec 2022] Available at: https://crstoday.com/articles/2017-may/the-new-dell-questionnaire/
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x.
McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers. 1992;60:175-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
Mester U, Vaterrodt T, Goes F, Huetz W, Neuhann I, Schmickler S, et al. Impact of personality characteristics on patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: results from the “happy patient study”. J Refract Surg. 2014t;30:674-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-05
Rudalevicius P, Lekaviciene R, Auffarth GU, Liutkeviciene R, Jasinskas V. Relations between patient personality and patients’ dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical study based on the five factor inven- tory personality evaluation. Eye. 2020;34:717-24. doi: 10.1038/ s41433-019-0585-x
Ntonti P, Bakirtzis M, Delibasis K, Seimenis I, Tsinopoulos I, Labiris G. Impact of personality on the decision process and on satisfaction rates in pseudophakic presbyopic correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48:1433-9. doi: 10.1097/j. jcrs.0000000000001021
Finlay PM, Atkinson JM, Moos KF. Orthognathic surgery: patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33:9-14. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(95)90078-0
Block CA, Erickson B, Carney-Doebbling C, Gordon S, Fallon B, Konety BR. Personality, treatment choice and satisfaction in patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2007;14:1013-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01875.x
Rosa AM, Miranda ÂC, Patrício MM, McAlinden C, Silva FL, Castelo-Branco M, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neuroadaptation to multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:1287-96. doi: 10.1016/j. jcrs.2017.07.031
Donaldson KE. Tips for dealing with unhappy refractive cataract surgery patient. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2022;10:1–4. doi:10.1007/s40135-022-00282-8
Lévy P, Elies D, Dithmer O, Gil-Campos I, Benmedjahed K, Berdeaux G, et al. Development of a new subjective questionnaire: the Freedom from Glasses Value Scale (FGVS). J Refract Surg. 2010;26:438-46. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090728-03
Berdeaux G, Meunier J, Arnould B, Viala-Danten M. Measuring benefits and patients’ satisfaction when glasses are not needed after cataract and presbyopia surgery: scoring and psychometric validation of the Freedom from Glasses Value Scale (FGVS). BMC Ophthalmol. 2010;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471- 2415-10-15.
Maxwell A, Holland E, Cibik L, Fakadej A, Foster G, Grosinger L, et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of bilateral implantation of a +2.5 diopter multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j. jcrs.2016.10.026
Kinard K, Jarstad A, Olson RJ. Correlation of visual quality with satisfaction and function in a normal cohort of pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.023
Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:504-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.038
Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Gupta N, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Shah S. Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.032
Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Gibson GA, Shah S. Development of a near activity visual questionnaire to assess accommodating intraocular lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30:134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.01.004
McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:553745. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5341
McNeely RN, Moutari S, Arba-Mosquera S, Verma S, Moore JE. An alternative application of Rasch analysis to assess data from ophthalmic patient-reported outcome instruments. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197503
Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness LA. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18, e1230. [accessed Dec 2022] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Do not forget to download the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication and Conflict of Interest.
The article can only be submitted with these two documents.
To obtain the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication file, click here.
To obtain the Conflict of Interest file (ICMJE template), click here
