Long-Term Effect of Intense Pulsed Light Combined with Low-Level Light Therapy in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Authors

  • João Leite Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-2228
  • Bruno Barbosa Ribeiro Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-9101
  • João Heitor Marques Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; ICBAS – Instituto de Ciência Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-7950
  • Paulo Sousa Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-9101
  • Saúl Pires Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
  • Pedro Menéres Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; ICBAS – Instituto de Ciência Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-3465
  • Irene Barbosa Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal; ICBAS – Instituto de Ciência Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6053-5339

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.33226

Keywords:

Dry Eye Syndromes, Intense Pulsed Light Therapy, Low-Level Light Therapy, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Meibomian Glands

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aim to evaluate the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with low-level light therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
METHODS: A prospective, double-arm and non-randomized study; adult patients with MGD were consecutively assigned to either IPL combined with LLLT (group 1, Eye-Light® + My-Mask® by Expansione Group, Italy) or IPL therapy alone (group 2, E>Eye® by ESW vision, France), with evaluation at baseline and at 1st, 6th, 12th and 18th month after treatment. Outcomes were the variation of the validated Dry Eye Related Questionnaire (OSDI-12) and automated analysis of the ocular surface (IDRA® Ocular Surface Analyzer SBM Sistemi, Italy) such: non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), blink rate (BR), tear meniscus height (TMH), lipid layer thickness (LLT) and loss area of meibomian glands (LAMG); tear osmolarity (Osm) by TearLab® Osmolarity System (Tearlab, San Diego, CA, USA), Schirmer’s test (ST) and slit lamp examination (Oxford score) were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (124 eyes) were included: 31 in group 1 and 31 in group 2. Comparing baseline with the 18th month of follow-up, both groups showed a significant improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI-12) (p<0.001), in LLT (p<0.001) and ST (group 1, p<0.001; group 2, p=0.029). There was a significant improvement in group 1 without improvement in group 2 in BR (p<0.001 vs p=0.618) and in TMH (p=0.040 vs p= 0.701). An increase in group 1 (p<0.001) with a decrease in group 2 (p=0.005) occurred in Osm; a decrease in both groups (group 1, p=0.789; group 2, p=0.133) was observed in NIBUT; no differences in both groups (group 1, p=0.659; group 2, p=0.158) were verified in Oxford score. During the follow-up, 6 eyes (group 1) and 16 eyes (group 2) were referred for retreatment.
CONCLUSION: IPL treatment is an effective and safe therapeutic choice for MGD. Both groups showed benefits in symptoms and automatic measurements even after 18 months. There was a need for earlier re-treatment in group 2, demonstrating the superiority of combined treatment in group 1, with maintenance of therapeutic benefit for a longer period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008.

Marta A, Baptista PM, Heitor Marques J, Almeida D, José D, Sousa P, et al. Intense Pulsed Plus Low-Level Light Therapy in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2803-11. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S318885.

Barbosa Ribeiro B, Marta A, Ponces Ramalhão J, Marques JH, Barbosa I. Pulsed Light Therapy in the Management of Dry Eye Disease: Current Perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:3883-93. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S349596.

Messmer EM. The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:71-81; quiz 82. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0071.

Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, Foulks GN, Sullivan BD. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012;31:472-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318225415a.

Ren X, Chou Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Liu Z, Li X. Comparison of intense pulsed light and near-infrared light in the treatment of dry eye disease: a prospective randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99:e1307-14. doi: 10.1111/aos.14833.

Marques JH, Marta A, Baptista PM, Almeida D, José D, Sousa PJ, et al. Low-Level Light Therapy in Association with Intense Pulsed Light for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:4003-10. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S384360.

The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5:75-92. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70081-2.

Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21:221-32.

Stonecipher K, Abell TG, Chotiner B, Chotiner E, Potvin R. Combined low level light therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:993-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S213664.

Castro C, Marques JH, Marta A, Baptista PM, José D, Sousa P, et al. Comparison of Light-Based Devices in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Cureus. 2023;15:e41386. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41386.

Pérez-Silguero MA, Pérez-Silguero D, Rivero-Santana A, Bernal-Blasco MI, Encinas-Pisa P. Combined Intense Pulsed Light and Low-Level Light Therapy for the Treatment of Dry Eye: A Retrospective Before-After Study with One-Year Follow-Up. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2133-40. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S307020.

Asbell PA, Stapleton FJ, Wickström K, Akpek EK, Aragona P, Dana R, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the clinical trials subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2065-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997h.

Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615.

Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22:640-50. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008.

Cote S, Zhang AC, Ahmadzai V, Maleken A, Li C, Oppedisano J, et al. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3:CD013559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013559.

Vigo L, Taroni L, Bernabei F, Pellegrini M, Sebastiani S, Mercanti A, et al. Ocular Surface Workup in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Treated with Intense Regulated Pulsed Light. Diagnostics. 2019;9:147. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040147.

Dell SJ, Gaster RN, Barbarino SC, Cunningham DN. Prospective evaluation of intense pulsed light and meibomian gland expression efficacy on relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:817-27. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S130706.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-11

How to Cite

Leite, J., Barbosa Ribeiro, B., Marques, J. H., Sousa, P., Pires, S., Menéres, P., & Barbosa, I. (2025). Long-Term Effect of Intense Pulsed Light Combined with Low-Level Light Therapy in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Revista Sociedade Portuguesa De Oftalmologia. https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.33226

Issue

Section

Original Article