Evaluation of Inflammatory Mediators in the Tear Film Before and After Corneal Cross-Linking

Authors

  • Bruno Teixeira Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-183X
  • Celso Costa Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Patrícia Sobral Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Andreia Rosa Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • João Gil Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Maria João Quadrado Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Cristina Tavares Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Esmeralda Costa Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Rosa Fernandes Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Lígia Costa Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Pedro Melo Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
  • Joaquim Murta Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra (FMUC), Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Coimbra, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.33242

Keywords:

Corneal Cross-Linking, Cytokines, Inflammation, Keratoconus/drug therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Keratoconus’ pathogenesis is not completely understood. One suspected contributor is inflammation at the corneal surface, often signaled by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the tear film. Corneal cross-linking is a recognized treatment to slow or halt disease progression. While corneal cross-linking has demonstrated promising results, there is notable variability in outcomes among patients, and the reasons for this remain incompletely understood. Our hypothesis posits that favorable post-operative outcomes may be linked to alterations in the pro-inflammatory cytokine content in a patient’s tear film. This study aims to explore the relationship between tear film pro-inflammatory cytokines and the effectiveness of corneal cross-linking treatment outcomes.
METHODS: Clinical evaluations captured corneal tomographic data, best-corrected distance visual acuity, and past medical history from participants. Two tear film samples were taken from individuals undergoing corneal cross-linking and from age-matched controls. These samples were collected both before the procedure and six months afterward using Schirmer strips. The cytokine analysis in these samples was performed using the commercially available Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17 Cytokine 18-Plex Human ProcartaPlex™ Panel.
RESULTS: We recruited 35 patients for the treatment group (57% females; mean age: 27.61±8.94 years) and 19 for the control group (47% females; mean age: 24.13±7.18 years). After corneal cross-linking, significant enhancements were observed in best-corrected distance visual acuity (p<0.0001) and tomographic indices such as Kmax (p=0.0417). Pre-operative mean total protein content stood at 1.54±0.46 µg/µL10 for the treatment cohort and 1.48±0.27 µg/µL10 for controls. Six months post-procedure, these figures were 1.40±0.428 µg/µL10 and 1.90±0.45 µg/µL10 for the treatment and control groups, respectively. Though there was a discernible trend of elevated pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in the pre-operative treatment group relative to both controls and post-corneal cross-linking results, the mean difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Our research indicates that elevated pro-inflammatory cytokine levels are seen in patients with keratoconus. We were unable to confirm our hypothesis that treatment with CXL may reduce PIC levels. Future studies with expanded sample sizes are essential to understand pro-inflammatory cytokines’ influence on both keratoconus pathophysiology and corneal cross-linking outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mas Tur V, MacGregor C, Jayaswal R, O’Brart D, Maycock N. A review of keratoconus: Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:770-83. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009.

Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297-319. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7.

Wisse RP, Kuiper JJ, Gans R, Imhof S, Radstake TR, Van der Lelij A. Cytokine expression in keratoconus and its corneal microenvironment: a systematic review. Ocul Surf. 2015;13:272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.04.006.

Ferrari G, Rama P. The keratoconus enigma: A review with emphasis on pathogenesis. Ocul Surf. 2020;18:363-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.03.006.

Nottingham J. Practical observations on conical cornea, and on the short sight, and other defects of vision connected with it. London: J. Churchill; 1854.

Ionescu C, Corbu CG, Tanase C, Jonescu-Cuypers C, Nicula C, Dascalescu D, et al. Inflammatory Biomarkers Profile as Microenvironmental Expression in Keratoconus. Dis Markers. 2016;2016:1243819. doi: 10.1155/2016/1243819.

Galvis V, Sherwin T, Tello A, Merayo J, Barrera R, Acera A. Keratoconus: An inflammatory disorder? Eye. 2015;29:843–59. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.63.

Galvis V, Sherwin T, Tello A, Merayo J, Barrera R, Acera A. Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder? Eye. 2015; 29:843–59. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.63

Lema I, Durán JA. Inflammatory molecules in the tears of patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:654–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.050.

Kolozsvári BL, Petrovski G, Gogolák P, Rajnavölgyi É, Tóth F, Berta A, et al. Association between mediators in the tear fluid and the severity of keratoconus. Ophthal Res. 2013;51:46–51. doi: 10.1159/000351626.

Fodor M, Vitályos G, Losonczy G, Hassan Z, Pásztor D, Gogolák P, et al. Tear Mediators NGF along with IL-13 Predict Keratoconus Progression. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021;29:1090-101. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2020.1716024.

Kobashi H, Rong SS. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8145651. doi: 10.1155/2017/8145651.

Subasinghe SK, Ogbuehi KC, Dias GJ. Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256:1363-84. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3966-0.

Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of Cross-links in Corneal Tissue. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66:97–103.

Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a–induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:620-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1.

Ezzeldin M, Filev F, Steinberg J, Frings A. Excimer laser treatment combined with riboflavin ultraviolet-A (UVA) collagen crosslinking (CXL) in keratoconus: a literature review. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40:2403-12. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01394-5.

Beckman KA, Gupta PK, Farid M, Berdahl JP, Yeu E, Ayres B, et al. Corneal crosslinking: Current protocols and clinical approach. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:1670-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.027.

Farhat R, Ghannam M, Azar G, Nehme J, Sahyoun M, Han-na N, et al. Safety, efficacy, and predictive factors of conventional epithelium-off corneal crosslinking in the treatment of progressive keratoconus. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:7487186. doi: 10.1155/2020/7487186.

Rentka A, Köröskényi K, Hársfalvi J, Szekanecz Z, Szucs G, Szodoray P, et al. Evaluation of commonly used tear sampling methods and their relevance in subsequent biochemical analysis. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017;54:521–9. doi: 10.1177/0004563217695843.

Guyette N, Williams L, Tran MT, Than T, Bradley J, Kehinde L, et al. Comparison of low-abundance biomarker levels in capillary collected nonstimulated tears and washout tears of aqueous-deficient and normal patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:3729–37. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11431.

Pieczyński J, Szulc U, Harazna J, Szulc A, Kiewisz J. Tear fluid collection methods: Review of current techniques. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:2245–51. doi: 10.1177/1120672121998922.

Bachhuber F, Huss A, Senel M, Tumani H. Diagnostic biomarkers in tear fluid: from sampling to preanalytical processing. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89514-8.

Pierce. BCA Protein Assay Kit 23225. 2020. [accessed Jan 2023] Available at: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/23225

Cortés-Ríos J, Zárate A, Figueroa J, Medina J, Fuentes-Lemus E, Rodríguez-Fernández M, et al. Protein quantification by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay follows complex kinetics and can be performed at short incubation times. Anal. Biochem. 2020;608:113904. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113904.

eBioscience. ProcartaPlex Multiplex Immunoassay. 2016. [accessed Jan 2023] Available at: https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/manuals/ProcartaPlexHuman-HS.pdf

Sorkin N, Varssano D. Corneal collagen crosslinking: A systematic review. Ophthalmologica. 2014;232:10–27. doi: 10.1159/000357979.

Hersh P, Greenstein S, Fry K. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:149–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.030.

Beckman K, Gupta P, Farid M, Berdahl J, Yeu E, Ayres B, et al. Corneal crosslinking: Current protocols and clinical approach. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:1670–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.027.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Teixeira, B., Costa, C., Sobral, P., Rosa, A., Gil, J., Quadrado, M. J., … Murta, J. (2024). Evaluation of Inflammatory Mediators in the Tear Film Before and After Corneal Cross-Linking. Revista Sociedade Portuguesa De Oftalmologia, 49(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.33242

Issue

Section

Original Article