Real-World Outcomes of Macular Buckling Surgery for Myopic Traction Maculopathy: A Decade of Clinical Experience

Authors

  • Edgar Lopes Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-2921
  • Jaime Rosales Hospital Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-8125
  • Veronika Matello Eyecare Clinic, Brescia, Italy
  • Lívio Costa Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Barbara Parolini Eyecare Clinic, Brescia, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.33255

Keywords:

Macular Degeneration, Myopia, Degenerative, Retinal Detachment, Visual Acuity

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) often presents as a therapeutic challenge. While pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) remains the mainstay treatment, macular buckling (MB) offers a promising alternative designed to counter the tractional force of the staphyloma. This study aims to evaluate the functional and structural outcomes of MB in treating MTM.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent MB surgery between 2012 and 2023. Outcomes analyzed include anatomical success rates, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) expressed in decimal notation, axial length (AL), and surgical complications.
RESULTS: Of the 200 clinical files analyzed, 75% were female patients and 52% right eyes. According to the MTM staging system, retinal stages were stage 1 in 9.5%, stage 2 in 29%, stage 3 in 32%, and stage 4 in 24.5% of eyes. For the foveal stages, 44.5% of eyes were in stage a, 33% in stage b, and 22.5% in stage c, with 43.5% presenting epiretinal changes. Sixty nine percent underwent MB alone, while 31% had a combined procedure with PPV. There was a significant BCVA improvement of 0.21 diopters from preoperative to 1-year postoperative (n=64, p=0.001). When comparing the 1-year postoperative BCVA to the last appointment (n=56), the difference was only -0.01, with a mean follow-up of 41 months (p=0.593). BCVA improved in 76.6% of eyes, remained stable in 13.6%, and decreased in 9.7%. Anatomical assessments revealed the following for the fovea: 80.9% resolution, 9.9% improvement, and 8.0% no change and 1.2% deterioration. For the retina, there was 89.5% resolution, 9.3% improvement and 1.8% no change. The AL decreased from 31.18 mm preoperative to 29.78 mm postoperative (p <0.001). Postoperatively, 9.5% of eyes required surgery revision and 10% of the eyes required a further PPV. MB was removed in 7.4% (n=14) of patients. Atrophy progression was seen in 41.3% of operated eyes and in 51.1% of the fellow eyes. Regarding retinal stage 3 and 4 (n=122), macular reattachment was achieved in 100%. Macular hole closure was achieved in 92.9% of the cases with one intervention.
CONCLUSION: MB stands out as an effective and safe technique for MTM treatment in highly myopic eyes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baba T, Ohno-Matsui K, Futagami S, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of foveal retinal detachment without macular hole in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:338-42. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01937-2

Panozzo G, Mercanti A. Optical coherence tomography findings in myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1455-60. doi:10.1001/ARCHOPHT.122.10.1455

Sun CB, Liu Z, Xue AQ, Yao K. Natural evolution from macular retinoschisis to full-thickness macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Eye. 2010;24:1787-91. doi:10.1038/EYE.2010.123

Fang X, Weng Y, Xu S, Chen Z, Liu J, Chen B, et al. Optical coherence tomographic characteristics and surgical outcome of eyes with myopic foveoschisis. Eye. 2009;23:1336-42. doi:10.1038/EYE.2008.291

Ikuno Y, Sayanagi K, Soga K, Oshima Y, Ohji M, Tano Y. Foveal anatomical status and surgical results in vitrectomy for myopic foveoschisis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2008;52:269-76. doi:10.1007/S10384-008-0544-8

Gaucher D, Haouchine B, Tadayoni R, Massin P, Erginay A, Benhamou N, et al. Long-term follow-up of high myopic foveoschisis: natural course and surgical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:455-62. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2006.10.053

Takano M, Kishi S. Foveal retinoschisis and retinal detachment in severely myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:472-6. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00186-5

Ouyang PB, Duan XC, Zhu XH. Diagnosis and treatment of myopic traction maculopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5:754-8. doi:10.3980/J.ISSN.2222-3959.2012.06.19

Parolini B, Palmieri M, Finzi A, Frisina R. Proposal for the management of myopic traction maculopathy based on the new MTM staging system. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:3265-76. doi:10.1177/1120672120980943

Parolini B, Palmieri M, Finzi A, Besozzi G, Lucente A, Nava U, et al. The new Myopic Traction Maculopathy Staging System. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:1299-312. doi:10.1177/1120672120930590

Parolini B, Arevalo JF, Hassan T, Kaiser P, Rezaei KA, Singh R, et al. International Validation of Myopic Traction Maculopathy Staging System. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2023;54:153-7. doi:10.3928/23258160-20230217-01

ZhaoX,LiY,MaW, LianP,YuX,ChenS,etal.Macular buckling versus vitrectomy on macular hole associated macular detachment in eyes with high myopia: a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106:582-6. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2020-317800

Poole TA, Sudarsky RD. Suprachoroidal implantation for the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:1408-12. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33553-X

Nakagawa N, Parel JM, Murray TG, Oshima K. Effect of scleral shortening on axial length. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:965-8.

Liu B, Chen S, Li Y, Lian P, Zhao X, Yu X,et al. Comparison of macular buckling and vitrectomy for the treatment of macular schisis and associated macular detachment in high myopia: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:e266-72. doi:10.1111/AOS.14260

Ripandelli G, Coppé AM, Fedeli R, Parisi V, D’Amico DJ, Stirpe M. Evaluation of primary surgical procedures for retinal detachment with macular hole in highly myopic eyes: a comparison [corrected] of vitrectomy versus posterior episcleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2258-64. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00861-2

Theodossiadis GP, Sasoh M. Macular buckling for retinal detachment due to macular hole in highly myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma. Retina. 2002;22:129. doi:10.1097/00006982-200202000-00030

Theodossiadis GP, Theodossiadis PG. The macular buckling procedure in the treatment of retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes with macular hole and posterior staphyloma: mean follow-up of 15 years. Retina. 2005;25:285-9. doi:10.1097/00006982-200504000-00006

Wakabayashi T, Shiraki N, Tsuboi K, Oshima Y, Abe K, Yamamoto Y, et al. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Postoperative Macular Hole Formation after Vitrectomy for Myopic Traction Maculopathy: SCHISIS Report No. 2. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7:779-87. doi:10.1016/J.ORET.2023.05.017

Jain M, Narayanan R, Gopal L, Padhi TR, Behera UC, Panda KG, et al. Post-vitrectomy secondary macular holes: Risk factors, clinical features, and multivariate analysis of outcome predictors. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71:2053-60. doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_1749_22

Palmieri M, Frisina R, Finzi A, Besozzi G, Parolini B. The Role of the Outer Lamellar Macular Hole in the Surgical Management of Myopic Traction Maculopathy. Ophthalmologica. 2021;244:229-36. doi:10.1159/000514993

Ohno-Matsui K, Lai TYY, Lai CC, Cheung CM. Updates of pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;52:156-187. doi:10.1016/J.PRETEYERES.2015.12.001

Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB, Cheung CM, Saw SM, Verhoeven VJ, et al. International Photographic Classification and Grading System for Myopic Maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:877-883.e7. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2015.01.022

Fang Y, Yokoi T, Nagaoka N, et al. Progression of Myopic Maculopathy during 18-Year Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:863-877. doi:10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2017.12.005

Parolini B, Frisina R, Pinackatt S, Besozzi G, Lucente A, Nava U, et al. Indications and results of a new l-shaped macular buckle to support a posterior staphyloma in high myopia. Retina. 2015;35(12):2469-2482. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000613

Mura M, Iannetta D, Buschini E, De Smet MD. T-shaped macular buckling combined with 25G pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole, macular schisis, and macular detachment in highly myopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:383-8. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2015-308124

Ortisi E, Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V. Surgical management of retinal detachment because of macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Retina. 2012;32:1704-18. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E31826B671C

Kim CY, Kim MS, Kim KL, Woo SJ, Park KH. Prognostic factors related with surgical outcome of vitrectomy in myopic traction maculopathy. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34:67-75. doi:10.3341/KJO.2019.0115

Taniuchi S, Hirakata A, Itoh Y, Hirota K, Inoue M. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for each stage of myopic traction maculopathy. Retina. 2013;33:2018-25. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3182A4892B

Hwang JU, Joe SG, Lee JY, Kim JG, Yoon YH. Microincision vitrectomy surgery for myopic foveoschisis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:879-84. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2012-302906

Ikuno Y, Sayanagi K, Ohji M, Kamei M, Gomi F, Harino S, et al. Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:719-24. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.10.019

Devin F, Tsui I, Morin B, Duprat JP, Hubschman JP. T-shaped scleral buckle for macular detachments in high myopes. Retina. 2011;31:177-80. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3181FC7E73

Burés-Jelstrup A, Alkabes M, Gómez-Resa M, Rios J, Corcóstegui B, Mateo C. Visual and anatomical outcome after macular buckling for macular hole with associated foveoschisis in highly myopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:104-9. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2013-304016

Alkabes M, Pichi F, Nucci P, Massaro D, Dutra Medeiros M, Corcostegui B, et al. Anatomical and visual outcomes in high myopic macular hole (HM-MH) without retinal detachment: a review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:191-9. doi:10.1007/S00417-013-2555-5

Ma IH, Hsieh YT, Yeh PT, Yang CH, Yang CM. Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment. Eye. 2020;34:392-9. doi:10.1038/S41433-019-0555-3

Feng J, Yu J, Chen Q, Zhou H, Chen F, Wang W, et al. Long-term surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of foveal detachment in pathologic myopia: based on the ATN classification. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22:175. doi:10.1186/S12886-022-02391-1

Alkabes M, Mateo C. Macular buckle technique in myopic traction maculopathy: a 16-year review of the literature and a comparison with vitreous surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256:863-77. doi:10.1007/S00417-018-3947-3

Devin F, Tsui I, Morin B, Duprat JP, Hubschman JP. T-shaped scleral buckle for macular detachments in high myopes. Retina. 2011;31(1):177-180. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3181FC7E73

Chen SN, Yang CM. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Insertion for Macular Hole-Associated Retinal Detachment in High Myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;162:99-106.e1. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2015.11.013

Baba R, Wakabayashi Y, Umazume K, Ishikawa T, Yagi H, Muramatsu D, et al. Efficacy of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique with vitrectomy for retinal detachment associated with myopic macular holes. Retina. 2017;37:466-71. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001211

Zhao X, Song H, Tanumiharjo S, Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen S, et al. Macular buckling alone versus combined inverted ILM flap on macular hole-associated macular detachment in patients with high myopia. Eye. 2023;37:2730-5. doi:10.1038/ S41433-023-02406-1

Tang N, Zhao X, Chen J, Liu B, Lu L. Changes in the choroidal thickness after macular buckling in highly myopic eyes. Retina. 2021;41:1858-66. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003125

Fang Y, Yokoi T, Shimada N, Du R, Shinohara K, Takahashi H, et al. Development of macular atrophy after pars plana vitrectomy for myopic traction maculopathy and macular hole retinal detachment in pathologic myopia. Retina. 2020;40:1881-93. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002709

Lee KS, Lee JS, Koh HJ. Surgical outcomes of myopic traction maculopathy according to the international photographic classification for myopic maculopathy. Retina. 2020;40:1492-9. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002642

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Lopes, E., Rosales, J., Matello, V. ., Costa, L., & Parolini, B. (2024). Real-World Outcomes of Macular Buckling Surgery for Myopic Traction Maculopathy: A Decade of Clinical Experience. Revista Sociedade Portuguesa De Oftalmologia, 48(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.33255

Issue

Section

Original Article