Real-World Outcomes of Macular Buckling Surgery for Myopic Traction Maculopathy: A Decade of Clinical Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.33255Keywords:
Macular Degeneration, Myopia, Degenerative, Retinal Detachment, Visual AcuityAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) often presents as a therapeutic challenge. While pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) remains the mainstay treatment, macular buckling (MB) offers a promising alternative designed to counter the tractional force of the staphyloma. This study aims to evaluate the functional and structural outcomes of MB in treating MTM.METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent MB surgery between 2012 and 2023. Outcomes analyzed include anatomical success rates, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) expressed in decimal notation, axial length (AL), and surgical complications.
RESULTS: Of the 200 clinical files analyzed, 75% were female patients and 52% right eyes. According to the MTM staging system, retinal stages were stage 1 in 9.5%, stage 2 in 29%, stage 3 in 32%, and stage 4 in 24.5% of eyes. For the foveal stages, 44.5% of eyes were in stage a, 33% in stage b, and 22.5% in stage c, with 43.5% presenting epiretinal changes. Sixty nine percent underwent MB alone, while 31% had a combined procedure with PPV. There was a significant BCVA improvement of 0.21 diopters from preoperative to 1-year postoperative (n=64, p=0.001). When comparing the 1-year postoperative BCVA to the last appointment (n=56), the difference was only -0.01, with a mean follow-up of 41 months (p=0.593). BCVA improved in 76.6% of eyes, remained stable in 13.6%, and decreased in 9.7%. Anatomical assessments revealed the following for the fovea: 80.9% resolution, 9.9% improvement, and 8.0% no change and 1.2% deterioration. For the retina, there was 89.5% resolution, 9.3% improvement and 1.8% no change. The AL decreased from 31.18 mm preoperative to 29.78 mm postoperative (p <0.001). Postoperatively, 9.5% of eyes required surgery revision and 10% of the eyes required a further PPV. MB was removed in 7.4% (n=14) of patients. Atrophy progression was seen in 41.3% of operated eyes and in 51.1% of the fellow eyes. Regarding retinal stage 3 and 4 (n=122), macular reattachment was achieved in 100%. Macular hole closure was achieved in 92.9% of the cases with one intervention.
CONCLUSION: MB stands out as an effective and safe technique for MTM treatment in highly myopic eyes.
Downloads
References
Baba T, Ohno-Matsui K, Futagami S, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of foveal retinal detachment without macular hole in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:338-42. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01937-2
Panozzo G, Mercanti A. Optical coherence tomography findings in myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1455-60. doi:10.1001/ARCHOPHT.122.10.1455
Sun CB, Liu Z, Xue AQ, Yao K. Natural evolution from macular retinoschisis to full-thickness macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Eye. 2010;24:1787-91. doi:10.1038/EYE.2010.123
Fang X, Weng Y, Xu S, Chen Z, Liu J, Chen B, et al. Optical coherence tomographic characteristics and surgical outcome of eyes with myopic foveoschisis. Eye. 2009;23:1336-42. doi:10.1038/EYE.2008.291
Ikuno Y, Sayanagi K, Soga K, Oshima Y, Ohji M, Tano Y. Foveal anatomical status and surgical results in vitrectomy for myopic foveoschisis. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2008;52:269-76. doi:10.1007/S10384-008-0544-8
Gaucher D, Haouchine B, Tadayoni R, Massin P, Erginay A, Benhamou N, et al. Long-term follow-up of high myopic foveoschisis: natural course and surgical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:455-62. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2006.10.053
Takano M, Kishi S. Foveal retinoschisis and retinal detachment in severely myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:472-6. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00186-5
Ouyang PB, Duan XC, Zhu XH. Diagnosis and treatment of myopic traction maculopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5:754-8. doi:10.3980/J.ISSN.2222-3959.2012.06.19
Parolini B, Palmieri M, Finzi A, Frisina R. Proposal for the management of myopic traction maculopathy based on the new MTM staging system. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:3265-76. doi:10.1177/1120672120980943
Parolini B, Palmieri M, Finzi A, Besozzi G, Lucente A, Nava U, et al. The new Myopic Traction Maculopathy Staging System. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:1299-312. doi:10.1177/1120672120930590
Parolini B, Arevalo JF, Hassan T, Kaiser P, Rezaei KA, Singh R, et al. International Validation of Myopic Traction Maculopathy Staging System. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2023;54:153-7. doi:10.3928/23258160-20230217-01
ZhaoX,LiY,MaW, LianP,YuX,ChenS,etal.Macular buckling versus vitrectomy on macular hole associated macular detachment in eyes with high myopia: a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106:582-6. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2020-317800
Poole TA, Sudarsky RD. Suprachoroidal implantation for the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:1408-12. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33553-X
Nakagawa N, Parel JM, Murray TG, Oshima K. Effect of scleral shortening on axial length. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:965-8.
Liu B, Chen S, Li Y, Lian P, Zhao X, Yu X,et al. Comparison of macular buckling and vitrectomy for the treatment of macular schisis and associated macular detachment in high myopia: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:e266-72. doi:10.1111/AOS.14260
Ripandelli G, Coppé AM, Fedeli R, Parisi V, D’Amico DJ, Stirpe M. Evaluation of primary surgical procedures for retinal detachment with macular hole in highly myopic eyes: a comparison [corrected] of vitrectomy versus posterior episcleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2258-64. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00861-2
Theodossiadis GP, Sasoh M. Macular buckling for retinal detachment due to macular hole in highly myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma. Retina. 2002;22:129. doi:10.1097/00006982-200202000-00030
Theodossiadis GP, Theodossiadis PG. The macular buckling procedure in the treatment of retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes with macular hole and posterior staphyloma: mean follow-up of 15 years. Retina. 2005;25:285-9. doi:10.1097/00006982-200504000-00006
Wakabayashi T, Shiraki N, Tsuboi K, Oshima Y, Abe K, Yamamoto Y, et al. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Postoperative Macular Hole Formation after Vitrectomy for Myopic Traction Maculopathy: SCHISIS Report No. 2. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7:779-87. doi:10.1016/J.ORET.2023.05.017
Jain M, Narayanan R, Gopal L, Padhi TR, Behera UC, Panda KG, et al. Post-vitrectomy secondary macular holes: Risk factors, clinical features, and multivariate analysis of outcome predictors. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71:2053-60. doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_1749_22
Palmieri M, Frisina R, Finzi A, Besozzi G, Parolini B. The Role of the Outer Lamellar Macular Hole in the Surgical Management of Myopic Traction Maculopathy. Ophthalmologica. 2021;244:229-36. doi:10.1159/000514993
Ohno-Matsui K, Lai TYY, Lai CC, Cheung CM. Updates of pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;52:156-187. doi:10.1016/J.PRETEYERES.2015.12.001
Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB, Cheung CM, Saw SM, Verhoeven VJ, et al. International Photographic Classification and Grading System for Myopic Maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:877-883.e7. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2015.01.022
Fang Y, Yokoi T, Nagaoka N, et al. Progression of Myopic Maculopathy during 18-Year Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:863-877. doi:10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2017.12.005
Parolini B, Frisina R, Pinackatt S, Besozzi G, Lucente A, Nava U, et al. Indications and results of a new l-shaped macular buckle to support a posterior staphyloma in high myopia. Retina. 2015;35(12):2469-2482. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000613
Mura M, Iannetta D, Buschini E, De Smet MD. T-shaped macular buckling combined with 25G pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole, macular schisis, and macular detachment in highly myopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:383-8. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2015-308124
Ortisi E, Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V. Surgical management of retinal detachment because of macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Retina. 2012;32:1704-18. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E31826B671C
Kim CY, Kim MS, Kim KL, Woo SJ, Park KH. Prognostic factors related with surgical outcome of vitrectomy in myopic traction maculopathy. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34:67-75. doi:10.3341/KJO.2019.0115
Taniuchi S, Hirakata A, Itoh Y, Hirota K, Inoue M. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for each stage of myopic traction maculopathy. Retina. 2013;33:2018-25. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3182A4892B
Hwang JU, Joe SG, Lee JY, Kim JG, Yoon YH. Microincision vitrectomy surgery for myopic foveoschisis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:879-84. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2012-302906
Ikuno Y, Sayanagi K, Ohji M, Kamei M, Gomi F, Harino S, et al. Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:719-24. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.10.019
Devin F, Tsui I, Morin B, Duprat JP, Hubschman JP. T-shaped scleral buckle for macular detachments in high myopes. Retina. 2011;31:177-80. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3181FC7E73
Burés-Jelstrup A, Alkabes M, Gómez-Resa M, Rios J, Corcóstegui B, Mateo C. Visual and anatomical outcome after macular buckling for macular hole with associated foveoschisis in highly myopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:104-9. doi:10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2013-304016
Alkabes M, Pichi F, Nucci P, Massaro D, Dutra Medeiros M, Corcostegui B, et al. Anatomical and visual outcomes in high myopic macular hole (HM-MH) without retinal detachment: a review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:191-9. doi:10.1007/S00417-013-2555-5
Ma IH, Hsieh YT, Yeh PT, Yang CH, Yang CM. Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis with foveal detachment. Eye. 2020;34:392-9. doi:10.1038/S41433-019-0555-3
Feng J, Yu J, Chen Q, Zhou H, Chen F, Wang W, et al. Long-term surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of foveal detachment in pathologic myopia: based on the ATN classification. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22:175. doi:10.1186/S12886-022-02391-1
Alkabes M, Mateo C. Macular buckle technique in myopic traction maculopathy: a 16-year review of the literature and a comparison with vitreous surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256:863-77. doi:10.1007/S00417-018-3947-3
Devin F, Tsui I, Morin B, Duprat JP, Hubschman JP. T-shaped scleral buckle for macular detachments in high myopes. Retina. 2011;31(1):177-180. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3181FC7E73
Chen SN, Yang CM. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Insertion for Macular Hole-Associated Retinal Detachment in High Myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;162:99-106.e1. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2015.11.013
Baba R, Wakabayashi Y, Umazume K, Ishikawa T, Yagi H, Muramatsu D, et al. Efficacy of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique with vitrectomy for retinal detachment associated with myopic macular holes. Retina. 2017;37:466-71. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001211
Zhao X, Song H, Tanumiharjo S, Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen S, et al. Macular buckling alone versus combined inverted ILM flap on macular hole-associated macular detachment in patients with high myopia. Eye. 2023;37:2730-5. doi:10.1038/ S41433-023-02406-1
Tang N, Zhao X, Chen J, Liu B, Lu L. Changes in the choroidal thickness after macular buckling in highly myopic eyes. Retina. 2021;41:1858-66. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003125
Fang Y, Yokoi T, Shimada N, Du R, Shinohara K, Takahashi H, et al. Development of macular atrophy after pars plana vitrectomy for myopic traction maculopathy and macular hole retinal detachment in pathologic myopia. Retina. 2020;40:1881-93. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002709
Lee KS, Lee JS, Koh HJ. Surgical outcomes of myopic traction maculopathy according to the international photographic classification for myopic maculopathy. Retina. 2020;40:1492-9. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002642
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC BY
Do not forget to download the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication and Conflict of Interest.
The article can only be submitted with these two documents.
To obtain the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication file, click here.
To obtain the Conflict of Interest file (ICMJE template), click here