Pars plana Vitrectomy for the Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments: Overview of Anatomical/Functional Success Rates and Drivers of Failure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.41647Keywords:
Retinal Detachment, Scleral Buckling, Visual Acuity, VitrectomyAbstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate the anatomical and functional success rate of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive series, single-centre study of vitrectomy naïve patients that underwent PPV for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment between 2021 and 2023. Recorded preoperative data included lens status, retinal defects, extent of the detachment (total versus subtotal), macula status, presence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, in logmar). Inferior detachments were defined based on the presence of a retinal break in the detached retina between 5-7 clock hours. Intraocular tamponade was performed with either C3F8 gas or silicone oil and a low threshold for retinectomy was adopted. Anatomical success was defined as complete retinal reattachment 3 months after oil removal or gas absorption; functional success was defined as BCVA equal or better than 1.00.
RESULTS: This study included 104 eyes from 104 patients (59% male) with a mean age of 61.9±12.5 years; 17 (16.2%) were high myopes and 34 (32.4%) had already undergone cataract surgery. Most (56; 53.8%) presented with multiple retinal defects; 43 (41.3%) had inferior retinal detachments. Tamponade was performed with C3F8 gas in 84.8% of cases. Single-surgery reattachment success was 86.5%; final anatomical success was 100% after a median of 2 surgeries (only 1 patient required 4 surgeries for final reattachment). Surgery in inferior defects had an overall single surgery success rate of 81.4% versus 90% in the remaining patients (x²=1.75, p=0.42); moreover, in a binary logistic model, no single included variable independently predicted anatomical success. Only 30.5% of patients had a preoperative BCVA equal or less than 1.0. Postoperative visual acuity improved from 1.71±0.09 to 0.58±0.05, with overall better final BCVA in macula-on patients (0.64 vs 0.22, p<0.001). Functional success was achieved in 84.8% of patients, a relevant increase from baseline (x²=7.2, p=0.007).
CONCLUSION: Pars plana vitrectomy is increasingly considered the gold standard for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Our success rate closely resembles the available published data, with high overall success rates in achieving anatomical reattachment and preserving or restoring visual function.
Downloads
References
Ghazi NG, Green WR. Pathology and pathogenesis of retinal detachment. Eye. 2002;16: 411-21. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700197
Ludwig CA, Vail D, Al-Moujahed A, Callaway NF, Saroj N, Moshfeghi A, et al. Epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in commercially insured myopes in the United States. Sci Rep. 2023;13: 9430. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35520-x
de Oliveira PR, Berger AR, Chow DR. Vitroretinal instruments: vitrectomy cutters, endolliumination and wide-angle viewing systems. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2016;2: 28. doi:10.1186/s40942-016-0052-9
Machemer R, Parel JM, Buettner H. A new concept for vitreous surgery. I. Instrumentation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;73: 1-7. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(72)90295-4
Mohamed S, Claes C, Tsang CW. Review of Small Gauge Vitrectomy: Progress and Innovations. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:6285869. doi:10.1155/2017/6285869
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA; 2013;310: 2191-4. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Schulze-Bonsel K, Feligen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M. Visual Acuities “Hand Motion” and “Counting Fingers” Can Be Quantified with the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2006;47: 1236-40. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0981
Benson MD, Sia D, Seamonte ME, Greve M, Hinz B, Tennant MT, et al. Phacovitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A Retrospective Review. Retina. 2021;41: 753-60. doi: 10.1097/iae.000000000002945
Feligen N, Walter P. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment--an ophthalmologic emergency. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111: 12-21; quiz 2. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0012
Heimann H, Zou X, Jandeek C, Kellner U, Bednakis NE, Kreuseel KM, et al. Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244: 69-78. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-0026-3
Lai CT, Kung WH, Lin CJ, Chen HS, Bair H, Lin JM, et al. Outcome of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using microincision vitrectomy and sutureless wide-angle viewing systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19: 230. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1238-3
Ong SS, Ahmed I, Gonzales A, Aguwa UT, Beatson B, Dai X, et al. Management of uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: a comparison of practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a real-world setting. Eye. 2023;37: 684-91. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02028-z
Dhoot AS, Popovic MM, Nichani PA, Eshtaghi A, Mihalache A, Sayal AP, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 15,947 eyes. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022;67: 932-49. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.005
Wong CW, Wong WL, Yeo YY, Loh BK, Wong EY, Wong DW, et al.Trends and factors related to outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a large asian tertiary eye center. Retina. 2014;34: 684-92. doi:10.1097/IAE.000136318248900
Haugstad M, Moosmayer S, Bragadottir R. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment -- surgical methods and anatomical outcome. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95: 247-51. doi: 10.1111/aos.13295
Bonnar J, Tan CH, McCullough P, Wright DM, Williamson T, Lois N, et al. Scleral Buckle, Vitrectomy, or Combined Surgery for Inferior Break Retinal Detachment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7: 837-47. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2023.05.006
Williamson TH, Lee EJ, Shunmuqan M. Characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and their relationship to success rates of surgery. Retina. 2014;34: 1421-7. doi:10.1097/iae.000000000000094
Kwon OW, Song JH, Roh MLRetinal Detachment and Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Dev Ophthalmol; 2016;55:154-62. doi:10.1159/000438972
Cicinelli MV, Benatti E, Starace V, Nadin F, Di Nisi E, Bandello F, et al. Recurrences and Macular Complications after Perfluorocarbon-Liquid-Free Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023;12: 3219-32. doi:10.1007/s40123-023-00811-z
Gerding H, Hersener A. Anatomical and functional results of primary pars plana vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013;230: 409-12. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1328392
Thelen U, Amler S, Osada N, Gerding H. Outcome of surgery after macula-off retinal detachment – results from MUSTARD, one of the largest databases on buckling surgery in Europe. Results from a large German case series. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90: 481-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01939.x
Pastor JC, Fernández I, de la Rúa ER, Coco R, Colmenares MR, Chicharro DS, et al. Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project – report 2; Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92: 378-82. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.129437
Bonnar J, Tan CH, McCullough P, Wright DM, Williamson T, Lois N. Scleral Buckle, Vitrectomy, or Combined Surgery for Inferior Break Retinal Detachment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7: 837-47. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2023.05.006
Ryan EH, Ryan CM, Forbes NJ, Yonekawa Y, Wagley S, Mitra RA, et al. Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes Study Report Number 2: Phakic Retinal Detachment Outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(8): 1077-85. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.007
Hwang JC. Regional practice patterns for retinal detachment repair in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153: 1125-8. 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.11.034
McLaughlin MD, Hwang JC.Trends in Vitreoretinal Procedures for Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000 to 2014. Ophthalmology. 2017;124: 667-73. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Do not forget to download the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication and Conflict of Interest.
The article can only be submitted with these two documents.
To obtain the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication file, click here.
To obtain the Conflict of Interest file (ICMJE template), click here
