Validity and reliability of the King’s Health Questionnaire in men undergoing radical prostatectomy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12707/RV21042

Keywords:

prostatectomy, urinary incontinence, lower urinary tract symptoms, validation study, prostatic neoplasms, nursing

Abstract

Background: Assessing the impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of men undergoing radical prostatectomy requires valid and reliable measures.

Objective: To analyze the validity and reliability of the King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Methodology: Methodological study. Reliability and structural, concurrent, and convergent validity were analyzed in a sample of 152 men. Significance was set at 0.05.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-dimensional structure, and the two factors explained 66.9% of variance. All domains were positively correlated with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. Positive correlations were found between urinary incontinence severity and KHQ domains and between the number of pads and Severity measures. Men with urge incontinence had worse levels of quality of life in the domains of Emotions (p = 0.020) and Severity measures (p = 0.013). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88, ranging from 0.64-0.84 in KHQ domains to 0.91 in McDonald’s omega.

Conclusion: The KHQ provided evidence of adequate validity and reliability in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Downloads

References

Abrams, P., Cardozo, L., Wagg, A., & Wein, A. (Eds.). (2017). Incontinence [6th International Consultation on Incontinence]. International Continence Society; International Consultation on Urological Diseases.

Ângulo, J. C., Cruz, F., Esquinas, C., Arance, I., Manso, M., Rodríguez, A., Pereira, J., Ojea, A., Carballo, M., Rabassa, M., Teyrouz, A., Escribano, G., Rodríguez, E., Teba, F., Celada, G., Madurga, B., Álvarez-Ossorio, J. L., Marcelino, J. P., Martins, F. E., & Martins, F. E. (2018). Treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with the adjustable transobturator male system: Outcomes of a multi-center Iberian study. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 37(4), 1458-1466. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23474

Azevedo, C., Mata, L. R., Braga, P. P., Chavez, G. M., Lopes, M. R., & Penha, C. S. (2018). The perception of men and wives about erectile dysfunction post radical prostatectomy. Texto e Contexto em Enfermagem, 27(1), e4870016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720180004870016

Bernardes, M. F., Chagas, S. C., Izidoro, L. C., Veloso, D. F., Chianca, T. C., & Mata, L. R. (2019). Impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of individuals undergoing radical prostatectomy. Revista Latino Americana de Enfermagem, 27, e3131. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2757.3131

Clavell-Hernández, J., Martin, C., & Wang, R. (2018). Orgasmic dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: Review of current literature. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 6(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.09.003

Damásio, B. F. (2012). Uses of exploratory factorial analysis in psychology. Avaliação Psicológica, 11(2), 213-228. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712012000200007&lng=pt&tlng=

Gotoh, M., Homma, Y., Funahashi, Y., Matsukawa, Y., & Kato, M. (2009). Psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. International Journal Urology, 16(3), 303-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02237.x

Hodges, P. W., Stafford, R. E., Hall, L., Neumann, P., Morrison, S., Frawley, H., Doorbar-Baptist, S., Nahon, I., Crow, J., Thompson, J., & Cameron, A. P. (2020). Reconsideration of pelvic floor muscle training to prevent and treat incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urologic Oncology, 38(5), 354-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.007

Huang, M. H., Chiu, A. F., & Kuo, H. C. (2014). Reliability and validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire for male lower urinary tract symptoms in Taiwan. Low Urinary Tract Symptoms, 6(1), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12011

Kelleher, C. J., Cardozo, L. D., Khullar, V., & Salvatore, S. (1997). A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 104(12), 1374-1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11006.x

Krhut, J., Zachoval, R., Smith, P. P., Rosier, P. F., Valanský, L., Martan, A., & Zvara, P. (2014). Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 33(5), 507-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22436

Margolis, M. K., Vats, V., Coyne, K. S., & Kelleher, C. (2011). Establishing the content validity of the Kings Health Questionnaire in men and women with overactive bladder in the US. Patient, 4(3), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.2165/11586480-000000000-00000

Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L.M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2019). COSMIN Study Design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments: Version July 2019. COnsensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf

Okamura, K., Nojiri, Y., & Osuga, Y. (2009). Reliability and validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire for lower urinary tract symptoms in both genders. BJU Int, 103(12), 1673-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08335.x

Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

Souza, A. C., Alexandre, N. M., & Guirardello, E. B. (2017). Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saude, 26(3), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742017000300022

Tamanini, J. T., D´Ancona, C. A., Botega, N. J., & Netto, N. R., Jr. (2003). Validação do “King’s Health Questionnaire” para o português em mulheres com incontinência urinária. Revista de Saúde Publica, 37(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102003000200007

Tamanini, J. T., Dambros, M., D’Ancona, C. A., Palma, P. C., & Netto, N. R., Jr. (2004). Validation of the “International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form” (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese. Revista de Saúde Pública, 38(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102004000300015

Teixeira, J. M., Couto, G. R., Prata, A. P., & Ferreira, P. L. (2020). Qualidade de vida do doente portador de patologia oncológica da próstata. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 5(1), e19063. https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV19063

Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755-782. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401

Published

2022-05-02

How to Cite

Mata, L. R. F. da, Azevedo, C., Moura, C. de C., Bernardes, M. F. V. G., Izidoro, L. C. de R., Estevam, F. E. B., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2022). Validity and reliability of the King’s Health Questionnaire in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Journal of Nursing Referência, 6(1, Supl. 1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV21042