Escala ALONE para ancianos portugueses: Traducción, adaptación cultural, validez de contenido y validez facial

Autores/as

  • Sara Guerra Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS@RISE), Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-3542
  • Liliana Sousa Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS@RISE), Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal; Universidade de Aveiro, Departamento de Educação e Psicologia, Aveiro, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3491-7119
  • Sofia Lurdes Rosas Silva Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, Escola Superior de Educação de Coimbra, Portugal; Centro de Investigação e Inovação em Educação, Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2856-3502
  • Maria Rosário Jesus Martins Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal; Unidade de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde: Enfermagem (UICISA: E), Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-5834
  • João Paulo Almeida Tavares Universidade de Aveiro, Departamento de Educação e Psicologia, Aveiro, Portugal; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS@RISE), Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal; Unidade de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde: Enfermagem (UICISA: E), Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-7978

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12707/RVI23.137.33676

Palabras clave:

adultos mayores, soledad, estudio de validación

Resumen

Marco contextual: La soledad entre los adultos mayores es un problema de salud pública que requiere una detección precoz para poder realizar intervenciones eficaces. La escala ALONE es breve (cinco ítems) y fiable, y tiene una utilidad clínica prometedora.

Objetivo: Traducción, adaptación cultural, validez de contenido y validez facial de la escala ALONE para adultos mayores portugueses que viven en la comunidad ( ≥ 65 años).

Metodología: Este estudio constó de tres fases: (a) traducción y adaptación cultural; (b) evaluación de la validez de contenido con 15 expertos (índice de validez de contenido, CVI), y (c) evaluación de la validez facial mediante entrevistas semiestructuradas con ocho adultos mayores.

Resultados: Se consiguió una equivalencia lingüística con la escala ALONE original. Los ítems mostraron una fuerte validez de contenido (CVI ≥ 0,8, CVI medio de 0,97), concordancia universal de 0,71, kappa excelente). La validez facial mostró que la escala ALONE capta los sentimientos de soledad, es útil y fácil de entender y completar.

Conclusión: La escala ALONE, traducida y adaptada culturalmente, es válida para evaluar la soledad entre adultos mayores portugueses en contextos comunitarios.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Baarck, J., d’Hombres, B., Tintori, G., Balahur, A., Cassio, L., & Pásztor, Z. (2021). Loneliness in Europe before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. In European Commission (Ed.), Loneliness in the EU: Insights from surveys and online media data (pp. 16-34). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/28343

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Borson, S., Scanlan, J., Brush, M., Vitaliano, P., & Dokmak, A. (2000). The Mini-Cog: A cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15(11), 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11<1021:AID-GPS234>3.0.CO;2-6

Bugallo-Carrera, C., Dosil-Díaz, C., Anido-Rifón, L., Pacheco-Lorenzo, M., Fernández-Iglesias, M. J., & Gandoy-Crego, M. (2023). A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101462

Carvalho, R., Sousa, L., & Tavares, J. (2023). Instruments for Assessing Loneliness in Older People in Portugal: A Scoping Review. Portuguese Journal of Public Health, 41(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000529147

Chawla, K., Kunonga, T. P., Stow, D., Barker, R., Craig, D., & Hanratty, B. (2021). Prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0255088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255088

Connell, J., Carlton, J., Grundy, A., Buck, E. T., Keetharuth, A. D., Ricketts, T., Barkham, M., Robotham, D., Rose, D., & Brazier, J. (2018). The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: Lessons learnt from service users when developing the recovering quality of life measure (ReQoL). Quality of Life Research, 27, 1893-1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y

Deol, E. S., Yamashita, K., Elliott, S., Malmstorm, T. K., & Morley, J. E. (2022). Validation of the ALONE scale: A clinical measure of loneliness. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 26(5), 421-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-022-1794-8

DiTommaso, E., & Spinner, B. (1997). Social and emotional loneliness: A re-examination of weiss’ typology of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(3), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00204-8

Golaszewski, N. M., LaCroix, A. Z., Godino, J. G., Allison, M. A., Manson, J. E., King, J. J., Weitlauf, J. C., Bea, J. W., Garcia, L., Kroenke, C. H., Saquib, N., Cannell, B., Nguyen, S., &

Bellettiere, J. (2022). Evaluation of social isolation, loneliness, and cardiovascular disease among older women in the US. JAMA Network Open, 5(2), e2146461. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46461

Guarda Nacional Republicana. (2022). Censos Sénior 2022. https://www.gnr.pt/noticias.aspx?linha=20474

Guerra, S., Sousa, L., Carvalho, R., Melo, S., & Ribeiro, O. (2022). Understanding Loneliness in Older Adults: Reports from Experts by Experience to Reach Digital Solutions. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 65(7), 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2021.2019866

Holt-Lunstad, J. (2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 437-458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902

Macià, D., Cattaneo, G., Solana, J., Tormos, J. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Bartrés-Faz, D. (2021). Meaning in life: A major predictive factor for loneliness comparable to health status and social connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627547

Martín-María, N., Caballero, F. F., Lara, E., Domènech-Abella, J., Haro, J. M., Olaya, B., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., & Miret, M. (2021). Effects of transient and chronic loneliness on major depression in older adults: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 36(1), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5397

McKenna-Plumley, P. E., Groarke, J. M., Turner, R. N., & Yang, K. (2020). Experiences of loneliness: A study protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. Systematic Reviews, 9(284). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01544-x

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., & Vet, H. C. (2014). COSMIN: Consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1309-1312). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_595

Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). Loneliness research: A survey of empirical findings. In L. A. Peplau, & S. E. Goldston (Eds.), Preventing the harmful consequences of severe and persistent loneliness (pp. 13-46). National Institute of Mental Health.

Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(3), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Sundström, A., Adolfsson, A. N., Nordin, M., & Adolfsson, R. (2020). Loneliness increases the risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(5), 919-926. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz139

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Wang, F., Gao, Y., Han, Z., Yu, Y., Long, Z., Jiang, X., Wu, Y., Pei, B., Cao, Y., Ye, J., Wang, M., & Zhao, Y. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 1307-1319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01617-6

Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x

Word Health Organization. (2021). Advocacy brief: Social isolation and loneliness among older people. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/343206/9789240030749-eng.pdf?sequence=1

Yusoff, M. S. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

Publicado

2024-09-23

Cómo citar

Guerra, S., Sousa, L., Silva, S. L. R., Martins, M. R. J., & Tavares, J. P. A. (2024). Escala ALONE para ancianos portugueses: Traducción, adaptación cultural, validez de contenido y validez facial. Revista De Enfermería Referencia, 6(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.12707/RVI23.137.33676

Número

Sección

Artículos de Investigación