This is an outdated version published on 2021-03-25. Read the most recent version.

Community and Architecture Treble

Patrick Geddes, Team X and John Turner

Authors

Oscar Eduardo Preciado Velásquez Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-0759

Keywords:

Project, Community, CIAM, Patrick Geddes, Participation

Abstract

This research seeks to relate some of the processes that led to consider within the Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne the inclusion of the concept of community and the successive incorporation of the settlers to the architectural project, by showing a context of references, reverberations and interactions around the subject. A bibliographic review of primary and secondary sources that narrate those actions from the end of the 19^th century was carried out, with the contribution of Patrick Geddes theories, which had a notable influence in Team X, leading to the end of CIAMs in the mid-20^th century, and also to the anarchist architect John Turner, a key figure who researched pioneering experiences of popular housing in Peru and disseminated them in the Global North. The discussions that took place in the CIAMs questioned the absolute hierarchy of the professional vis-à-vis the communities, in which the notion of authorship of work is disregarded and is fully transferred to the users. Those pioneering experiences can be a call for attention to consider spaces not disputed by the real estate market as a part of architectural praxis, especially in Latin America. This involves a process of recognition and clash with the reality of most of the geographic space of our cities – unequal in essence – and eager for expeditious solutions to the great contradictions that prevail in our context.

References

Agama, R.C.O. Plan Piloto De Lima (1949). Significado Histórico. Avalaible from: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/107541/21BCN_OrtizRobinson.pdf ?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Retrieved on: 10 nov. 2019.
Barone, A. C. C; Dobry, S (2004). "Arquitetura participativa" na visão de Giancarlo de Carlo. Pós, São Paulo, v. 15, n. 1, p. 18-31. Avalaible from: <http://www.revistas.usp.br/posfau/article/view/43369>. Retrieved on: 9 dez. 2019.
Bastos, C. M. V. E (2007). A participação do usuário no processo de projeto de habitação de interesse social em sistemas autogestionários. (Dissertação) UFMG, Brazil.
Berges, R (2019). PREVI: Planning for Community Control. Avalaible from: https://www.academia.edu/36718955/PREVI_Planning_for_Community_Control. Retrieved on: 10 nov. 2019.
Bourdieu, P (2004). Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. 1. ed. São Paulo: UNESP.
CAU (2015). Pesquisa CAU/BR Datafolha, 2015. Avalaible from: https://www.caubr.gov.br/pesquisa2015/. Retrieved on: 15 dez. 2019.
Chavez, R; Viloria, J; Zipperer, M (2000). Interview of John F.C.Turner. Avalaible from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTUSU/Resources/turner-tacit.pdf. Retrieved on: 11 jun. 2019.
Conrads, Ulrich (1973). Manifesto de La Sarraz, 1928: In: Programas y Manifiestos de La Arquitectura del Siglo XX. Lumen. 1. ed. [S.l.]
Dos Santos, T (2014). Who decides? Who provides?: Um contributo para a compreensão da obra de John Turner. 1. ed. Univ. Coimbra: Diss. Mestrado.
Espinoza, J. C. H (2012). Fernando Belaunde Terry e o ideário moderno na Arquitetura e no Urbanismo no Perú entre 1936 e 1968. (Tese Doutorado) UFBA. p. 24-100.
Espinoza, JCH; Grappi, L (2017). Novas-velhas questões? [Re]visitando as teorias de John F. C. Turner sobre a “cidade informal” no Brasil. XVII ENANPUR, São Paulo, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-17. Avalaible from: <http://anpur.org.br/xviienanpur/principal/publicacoes/XVII.ENANPUR_Anais/ST_Sessoes_Tematicas/ST%207/ST%207.6/ST%207.6-03.pdf>. Retrieved on: 3 nov. 2019.
Frampton, K (2003). História Critica da Arquitetura Moderna. 3. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. p. 327-340.
Gnecco, G.S (1983). Responsabilidad Social del Arquitecto: In: Segre, R. América Latina en su Arquitectura. 5. ed. [S.l.: s.n.] p. 204-215.
Gropius, W (1919). Manifesto da Bauhaus, Weimar, 1919. Avalaible from: https://www.goethe.de/ins/br/pt/kul/fok/bau/21394277.html. Retrieved on: 5 nov. 2019.
Harris, R (2001). A double irony: the originality and influence of John F.C. Turner. Habitat International, USA, v. 491, n. 1, p. 1-25. Avalaible from: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222555986_A_double_irony_The_originality_and_influence_of_John_FC_Turner>. Retrieved on: 3 nov. 2019.
Hysler-Rubin, N (2011). Patrick Geddes and Town Planning: A critical view. 1. ed. London: Routledge, p. 21-44.
Kapp, S (2005a). Por que teoria crítica da arquitetura? Uma explicação e uma aporia. In: Maria Lúcia Malard (ed.). Cinco Textos Sobre Arquitetura. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. p. 115-167.
Kapp, S; Baltazar, AP; Morado, D (2008). Architecture as critical exercise: little pointers towards alternative practices in architecture, keynote lecture. Field: a free journal for architecture, Alternate Currents International Symposium, Sheffield, November, 2007, v. 2, n. 1, p. 7-30.
________ (2005b). Moradia e contradições do projeto moderno. Interpretar Arquitetura, Belo Horizonte, v. 6, n. 1, p. 123-138. Avalaible from: <http://www.mom.arq.ufmg.br/mom/01_biblioteca/arquivos/kapp_05_moradia_contradicoes.pdf>. Retrieved on: 5 nov. 2019
Keulartz, J (2016). From Patrick Geddes to Lewis Mumford and Beyond. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/1161406/From_Patrick_Geddes_to_Lewis_Mumford_and_Beyond. Acesso em: 9 dez. 2019.
Langrish, J (2016). The Design Methods Movement: From Optimism to Darwinism. Design Research Society, Brighton, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-13. Avalaible from: <https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55ca3eafe4b05bb65abd54ff/t/574f0971859fd01f18ec63c1/1464797554420/222+Langrish.pdf>. Retrieved on: 3 nov. 2019.
Lucas, P; Salas, J; Barrionuevo, R (2012). Cuarenta años del PREVI-LIMA: Algunas enseñanzas para la industrialización de la vivienda de bajo coste en Latinoamérica. Informes de la Construcción, Madrid, v. 64, n. 525, p. 51-62.
Mumford, EP (2000). The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928-1960. 1. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 120-140.
Nunes, JH (2019). Patrick Geddes. In: ENDICI (Enciclopédia Discursiva da Cidade). Avalaible from: https://www.labeurb.unicamp.br/endici/index.php?r=verbete%2Fview &id=40. Retrieved on: 4 nov. 2019.
Piza, J (2003). Vida e obra de Giancarlo de Carlo. Resenhas Online, São Paulo, ano 02, n. 022.01, Vitruvius. Avalaible from: <https://www.vitruvius.com.br/revistas/read/resenhasonline/02.022/3205>. Retrieved on: 28 out. 2019.
Ramos, FV (2013). Team 10: Manifesto de Doorn. São Paulo: USJT. p.159-168.
Rao-Cavale, K (2016). Patrick Geddes in India: Anti-colonial nationalism and the historical time of ‘Cities in Evolution’. Landscape Urban Plan. Avalaible from: http://isiarticles.com/bundles/Article/pre/pdf/157500.pdf. Retrieved on: 2 dez. 2019.
Risselada, M; Heuvel, D (2006). X CIAM (Dubrovnik) - Carta do Habitat. In: Cronologia do Urbanismo UFBA. Avalaible from: http://www.cronologiadourbanismo.ufba.br/apresentacao.php?idVerbete=2. Retrieved on: 28 out. 2019.
Shoshkes, E (2016). Jaqueline Tyrwhitt translates Patrick Geddes for post world war two planning. Landscape Urban Plan. Avalaible from: http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.011. Retrieved on: 4 nov. 2019.
Stevens, Garry (2002). The favoured circle: The Social Foundations of Architectural Distinction. 1. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 24-100.
Tafuri, M (1976). Architecture and Utopia: Design and Capitalist Development. Trad. Barbara La Penta. 1. ed. Cambridge, MA (EUA): MIT Press, 1976. p. 170-182.