A comment on decisions no. 480/2013 and 494/2013 of the constitutional court. The legal dimension of term limitations
Keywords:
Mandate’s Limitation; Renovation Principle; Autarquias; Interpretation; Constitutional CourtAbstract
The 46/2005 Law, dated from the 29th of August, entry into force – which predicted the limitation concerning the Mayors and the Juntas de Freguesia – dictated the end of exercise of many of the current Mayors in functions. This theme has been, from a long time to this period, subject to an intense debate concerning, since the very beginning, the Republican Renovation Principle. Nevertheless, the problematic concerning this Law application has been configured, to a large extent, as considering its interpretation e consequent imposed limitation range effect. What rests on the table is to know if one Mayor that had exercised his duties during three consecutive mandates on a specific autarquia could entail new functions on a different one. Before a difficult legislation and the Assembleia da Republica‘s inertia, the Constitutional Court was called to intervene. These are the decisions which our work will analyze.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 e-Publica - Public Law Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.