Motor assessment instruments and psychometric procedures: A systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.6397Abstract
It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library Online - SciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". There was a total of 734 articles, of which, after the exclusion criteria, remained only 11 studies. It was found that there are differences between the authors in relation to the psychometric factors taken into account in cross-cultural validation. So that there was a lack of unanimity of the validation criteria of all studies in this field.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright of their work.
Upon acceptance for publication, authors grant Sílabas Didáticas, LDA a non-exclusive licence to publish, reproduce, distribute, communicate the article to the public, and identify itself as the original publisher of the article in print and electronic formats, including its indexing and dissemination through databases, repositories, and other scholarly platforms.
All published articles are made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0).
This licence permits non-commercial use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and to Journal Motricidade, and that any changes made are indicated.
Authors may deposit the final published version of the article (Version of Record) in institutional repositories, subject repositories, academic networks, or personal websites, provided that the original publication is properly cited.
