In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs

Authors

  • Margarida Lima Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto; Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar do Porto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v22.i4.9914

Keywords:

Scientific education, publication of scientific manuscripts

Abstract

In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Preparing a manuscript for submission.

Singapore Med J 2009; 50:759 -61; quiz 762.

Peh WC, Ng KH. Conflict -of -interest, copyright and other de-

clarations. Singapore Med J 2010; 51:844 -46; quiz 847.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. How a submitted manuscript is processed.

Singapore Med J 2009; 50:853 -5; quiz 856.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Role of the manuscript reviewer. Singapo-

re Med J 2009; 50:931 -3; quiz 934.

Garmel GM. Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals.

Perm J 2010;14:32 -40.

Annesley TM. Seven reasons not to be a peer reviewer - -and

why these reasons are wrong. Clin Chem 2012; 58:677 -9.

Marusi? M, Sambunjak D, Marusi? A. Guide for peer re-

viewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.

Croat Med J 2005; 46:326 -32.

Pierson DJ. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not ac-

cepted for publication. Respir Care 2004; 49:1246 -52.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Dealing with returned manuscripts. Singa-

pore Med J 2009; 50:1050 -2; quiz 1053.

Annesley TM. Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and edi-

tor comments. Clin Chem 2011; 57:551 -4.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-05

How to Cite

1.
Lima M. In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs. REVNEC [Internet]. 2016Sep.5 [cited 2025Jan.20];22(4):263-8. Available from: https://revistas.rcaap.pt/nascercrescer/article/view/9914

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 4 (2013)

Section

Scientific Education

License

Copyright and Authors' Rights

All articles published in Nascer e Crescer - Birth and Growth Medical Journal are Open Access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. For use by third parties, Nascer e Crescer - Birth and Growth Medical Journal adheres to the terms of the Creative Commons License "Attribution - Non-Commercial Use (CC-BY-NC)".

It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to reproduce figures, tables, etc. from other publications.

Authors must submit a Conflict of Interest statement and an Authorship Form with the submission of the article. An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript.

Authors are permitted to make their articles available in repositories at their home institutions, provided that they always indicate where the articles were published and adhere to the terms of the Creative Commons license.