In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs

  • Margarida Lima Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto; Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar do Porto
Keywords: Scientific education, publication of scientific manuscripts

Abstract

In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs.

References

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Preparing a manuscript for submission.

Singapore Med J 2009; 50:759 -61; quiz 762.

Peh WC, Ng KH. Conflict -of -interest, copyright and other de-

clarations. Singapore Med J 2010; 51:844 -46; quiz 847.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. How a submitted manuscript is processed.

Singapore Med J 2009; 50:853 -5; quiz 856.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Role of the manuscript reviewer. Singapo-

re Med J 2009; 50:931 -3; quiz 934.

Garmel GM. Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals.

Perm J 2010;14:32 -40.

Annesley TM. Seven reasons not to be a peer reviewer - -and

why these reasons are wrong. Clin Chem 2012; 58:677 -9.

Marusi? M, Sambunjak D, Marusi? A. Guide for peer re-

viewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.

Croat Med J 2005; 46:326 -32.

Pierson DJ. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not ac-

cepted for publication. Respir Care 2004; 49:1246 -52.

Peh WCG, Ng KH. Dealing with returned manuscripts. Singa-

pore Med J 2009; 50:1050 -2; quiz 1053.

Annesley TM. Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and edi-

tor comments. Clin Chem 2011; 57:551 -4.

Published
2016-09-05
How to Cite
Lima, M. (2016). In this four and last manuscript, from the heading “DESIGN, WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPTS”, as part of the “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION” section of the journal “NASCER E CRESCER”, we emphasize the need for verification of the last version of the scientific paper and we present the most relevant aspects of the process of publishing, since its submis- sion until the final decision of refusal or acceptance, and in the latter case, the correction of the proofs. NASCER E CRESCER - BIRTH AND GROWTH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 22(4), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v22.i4.9914
Section
Scientific Education