Nursing Process related to nursing focus "Airway Clearance"
A Scoping Review Protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48492/servir0205.29981Keywords:
Advanced Practice Nursing, Airway Clearance, Nursing, Nursing Process, scoping reviewAbstract
Introduction: Each year, more than a billion people suffer from respiratory diseases, and about 4 million people die from these diseases worldwide. Airway Clearance impairment is deeply related to these diseases, causing a significant impact on patients’ self-care, profoundly altering their quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to identify clinical data, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions that provide a solid basis for clinical reasoning, improve clinical records, and integrate the best scientific evidence to enhance nursing care.
Objective: To map the existing evidence on clinical data, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions addressing nursing focus “Airway Clearance”.
Methods: This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review methodology. Published English, Portuguese, and Spanish literature from 1975 to 2021 in MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro databases will be considered for inclusion. Data will be extracted using a charting table aligned to the scoping review objectives.
Results: With this scoping review, we aim to show clinical data, nursing diagnosis and nursing interventions addressing nursing focus “Airway Clearance”.
Conclusion: The findings of this review will add substantial value for systematizing the nursing process related to nursing focus “Airway Clearance”. Reaching a consensus regarding this process seems highly relevant, as it could improve nursing decision-making and care quality.
Downloads
References
Arksey, H., & O´Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Advancing towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
Bacelar, G., & Correia, R. (2015). As bases do Open EHR. Virtual Care.
Cruz, I., Bastos, F., Pereira, F., Silva, A., & Sousa, P. (2016). Analysis of the Nursing Documentation in use in Portugal - Building a Clinical Data Model of Nursing Centered on the Management of Treatment Regimen. Nursing Informatics, 407-411.
Dransfield, M., Stolz, D., & Kleinert, S. (2019). Towards eradication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Lancet Commission. The Lancet, 393.
GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. (2020). Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8.
Gonçalves, P., Sequeira, C., & Paiva e Silva, M. (2018). Content analysis of nursing diagnoses in mental health records in Portugal. International Nursing Review, 10.
Griffits, S., Hines, S., Moloney, C., & Ralph, N. (2019). Characteristics and processes of clinical reasoning in nurses and factors related to its use: a scoping review protocol. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports.
Guoli, L., Yue, L., Peng, Z., Xiong, G., & Li, Y. (2018). Clinical effects of nursing intervention on severe patients in the respiratory department. Biomedical Research, 966-969.
Hoover, R. (2016). Benefits of using an electronic health record. Nursing2016.
International Council of Nurses. (2023, march 3). ICNP Browser. Retrieved from ICNP Browser: https://www.icn.ch/what-we-do/projects/ehealth-icnptm/icnp-browser
Keser, İ. (2016). The Use of Nursing Information Systems in Nursing Care. The Journal of MacroTrends in Health and Medicine.
Lee, J., & Park, H. (2017). Development and validation of detailed clinical models for nursing actions in perinatal care. International Journal of Medical Informatics.
Levac, D. C. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. . Implementation.
Meleis, A. I. (2010). Transitions theory: Middle-Range and situation-specific theories in nursing research and practice. Nova Iorque: Springer Publishing Company.
Neves, H., & Parente, P. (2019). A nursing clinical data model for neuromuscular processes:. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 1609-1606.
Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., & Mcinerney, P. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare.
Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., Mcinerney, P., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute.
Tricco, A., Lille, E., Zarin, W., O´Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., & Levac, D. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 467-473.
World Health Organization. (2023, march 3). World Health Organization. Retrieved from World Health Organization: https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of-death-and-disability-worldwide-2000-2019
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luis Gaspar, Neuza Reis, Paula Sousa, Abel Paiva e Silva, Natália Machado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In order to promote the free circulation of knowledge, Servir is open access journal. All its content is available and protected under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows self-archiving in institutional repositories of all versions, which may become immediately available
