Formas de análisis de la relación entre anfitriones y turistas

Authors

  • Marcelo Sánchez-Oro Sánchez University of Extremadura, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57883/thij8(1)2017.30346

Keywords:

Social exchange, Tourism sociology, Hosts and guests, Rural tourism

Abstract

The present article intends to present some aspects about the study of the relationship between hosts and guests in the field of tourism (the `host & guest ́ context, for Anglo-Saxon scholars). This relationship is increasingly important in so-called sustainable tourism, which is based on the interaction between the residents in charming and tourism potential areas, with visitors. In our opinion, much of the sustainability of the tourism "business" depends on how this relationship evolves. The exchange between both groups of actors (hosts and guests) is on the basis of this relationship. This exchange can be developed in different ways: it can be balanced or unbalanced, according to the negotiating capacities of each part. It may favor or not the dependence of one of the parties, especially when the viable alternatives to the tourist business are limited. On the contrary, it can favor the independence and empowerment of the parties, if there are acceptable counterparts and alternative options. This exchange will be in function on a series of variables from which we stand out the degree of exposure of `the hosts ́ to the tourist phenomenon. The Theory of Social Interchange (TIS) offers an explanatory paradigm of the role of the strategies that the different actors can deploy in this relational context. At the empirical level, literature offers examples of how to approach analytically the relationship between hosts and tourists. This article explained some researches, the sampling designs and the scales that have been made, validated and applied. All this has the interest of being able to be replicated in contexts different from those that have been used for its generation and development, especially in rural areas of peripheral regions.

References

Ap, J., (1992). Residents' perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, Issue 19, pp. 665-690.

Blau, P., (1964). Exchange and power. New York: Wiley.

Bryant, E. G. & Napier, T., (1981). The aplication of social exchange theory to estudy of satisfaction with outdoor recreation facilities. En: Outdoor recreation planning, perspectives, and research. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, pp. 83-98.

Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1988). Diseños experimentales y cuasi experimentales en investigación social. Amorrortu.

Castaño, J. M. (2005). Psicología social de los viajes y del turismo. Madrid: Thomson.

Feleppa, R. (1986). Emics, Etics and Social Objectivity. Current Anthropology(27), 243-255.

Castaño, J. M., (2005). Psicología social de los viajes y del turismo.. Madrid: Thomson.

Díaz Armas, R., (2010). La actitud del residente en el destino turístico de Tenerife:

evaluación y tendencia. Pasos. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, núm. 8(4),

pp. 431-444

García Ferrando, M. (2008). Socioestadística. Introducción a la estadística en sociología. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Giner, S. & Espinosa, L. D., (1998). Diccionario de Sociología. Alianza Editorial..

Gutiérrez Brito, J., (2007). La investigación Social del turismo. Madrid: Thomson.

Huete y Mantecón, (2015). La construcción de la opinión pública sobre el turismo: Crítica a la teoría del intercambio social, en Hiernaux-Nicolas, D. (coord.) Turismo, sociedad y territorio: una lectura crítica. Querétaro: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, México.

Huete, R. (2010). Opiniones y actitudes ante el turismo residencial en el sur de la

Comunidad Valenciana. Pasos. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, núm. 8(4),

pp. 445-461

Jacobsen, (2000). Ant tourist attitudes Mediterranean charter tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, pp. 284-300.

Pizam, A. (1978). Tourism Impacts: the social cost to the destination community as perceived by its residents. Journal of Travel Research, 164, 8-12

Mantecón, A., (2008). La experiencia del turismo. Un estudio sociológico sobre el proceso turístico-residencial. Barcelona: Icaria.

Marrero, J.R. y Huete, R., (2013), La opinión pública sobre el empleo turístico en la Comunidad Valenciana. Cuadernos de Turismo, núm. 32: 189-206.

Pearce, (1982). The social psychology of tourist behaviour.. Syndey: Pergamon.

Perdue, Long & Allen, L., (1987). Rural resident tourism percecpción and attitudes. Annal of Torusism Research, Issue 14, pp. 420-430.

Plog, (1977). Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity.. En: Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. s.l.:s.n., pp. 55-58.

Ritchie, B.W. e Inkari, M.(2006). Host community attitudes toward tourism and cultural tourism development: the case of the Lewes District, Southern England. International

Journal of Tourism Research, núm. 8(1), pp. 27-44.

Saremba y Gili, (1991). Value conflicts in Mountain Park settings. Annals of Tourism Research, 18, 3, 455-473.

Teye, Sirakaya & Sömmez, (2002) Resident's attitudes toward tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, pp. 668-688.

Published

2017-05-27

How to Cite

Sánchez-Oro Sánchez, M. (2017). Formas de análisis de la relación entre anfitriones y turistas. Tourism and Hospitality International Journal, 8(2), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.57883/thij8(1)2017.30346