Governação territorial e desenvolvimento sustentável nas regiões periféricas: Desafios económicos e institucionaisELOPMENT IN PERIPHERICAL REGIONS: ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57883/thij15(1)2020.30885Palabras clave:
Gestión sostenible, Sistema agroforestal, Gobernanza territorialResumen
Esta investigación tiene como objetivo investigar cómo la gobernanza territorial puede inducir el desarrollo sostenible, teniendo en cuenta el reto del crecimiento inteligente y la creación de empleo duradero, la descarbonización de la economía y la valoración turística de los activos intangibles incrustados en un determinado territorio. Analizando casos regionales de gestión sostenible (la ruta del vino del Tajo y el aprovechamiento hidrográfico del valle del río Sorraia), mediante revisión bibliográfica y observación directa, argumentamos que las instituciones ibéricas de educación en asociación con los polos científicos y tecnológicos desempeñan un papel estratégico para fomentar el progreso del conocimiento científico sobre soluciones eficaces contra el cambio climático, incluyendo el conjunto de los sectores de actividad económica. Además, esas instituciones también son cruciales para difundir técnicas de producción más respetuosas con el medio ambiente por parte de las empresas (especialmente en las microempresas y pequeñas empresas) y las organizaciones de la economía social. El punto principal es que sólo un proceso transparente de negociación abierto a todas las partes interesadas - a través de la creatividad, el espíritu empresarial, el espíritu de ciudadanía y la solidaridad intergeneracional - puede conducir a la maximización de la calidad de vida de las personas que viven en esta parte del territorio ibérico.
Citas
Araújo, R. S., Alves, M., Melo, T. C., Chrispim, Z., Mendes, P. & Júnior, G. S. (2015). Water resource management: A comparative evaluation of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, the European Union and Portugal. Science of the Total Environment, 511, 815-828.
Alves, P. et al. (2019). Uma abordagem ao impacto dos institutos politécnicos em Portugal 2017. Lisboa: CCISP.
Antonescu, D. (2015). Territorial pact in context of Europe 2020. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 188, 282-289.
Arbo, P. & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review. OECD Education working paper 2007/09, Paris: OECD.
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2004). Democracy and public management reform: Building the republican state. Oxford Scholarship Online. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10967490601185773.
Charney, A. & Pavlakovich-Kochi, V. (2003). University of Arizona research expenditures: Generating jobs, wages and tax revenues in the local economy. Tucson, AZ: Office of Economic Development, University of Arizona.
Climate Technology Centre & Network (2019). General agro-forestry-silviculture and mixed farming solutions. Available at https://www.ctc-n.org/technology-library/agriculture-and-forestry/agro-forestry-silviculture-mixed-farming/general-agro.
Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
Committee of the Regions (n.d.). Territorial pacts: Making the most of Europe 2020 through partnership.
Entidade Regional de Turismo do Alentejo/Ribatejo. (2014). Roteiros Enogastronómicos: Da terra à mesa - Ribatejo. Beja: Turismo do Alentejo, ERT.
European Commission (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020 final. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF
European Commission/Eurostat (2018). Regions in the European Union: Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics - NUTS 2016/EU-28. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Ferreiro, M. F., Sousa, C. & Oliveira, P. (2015, July 16-18). Governance and innovation in rural territories: A network analysis. Proceedings of the VI Congress of Rural Studies, pp. 1-20. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/1386.
Ferreiro, M. F., Fayaz, S., Reidolf, M. & Sousa, C. (2019). Tradition and innovation: Between dynamics and tensions. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11(4), 533-542.
Friedmann, J. & Douglass, M. (1975). Agropolitan development: towards a new strategy for regional development in Asia. In: United Nations Centre for Regional Development (org.) Growth pole strategy and regional development planning in Asia (pp. 333-387). Nagoya, Japan: UNCRD.
Friedmann, J. & Weaver, C. (1981). Territorio y funcion: La evolucion de la planificación regional. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local.
Hermannsson, K. & Swales, J. K. (2010). Capturing the overall economic impacts of HEIs. University of Strathclyde, Department of Economics. Glasgow, October 2010.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística/Portugal Statistics (2015). NUTS 2013: As novas unidades territoriais para fins estatísticos. Lisboa, INE.
Jardon, C. & Pagani, R. (2016). Is collective efficiency in subsistence clusters a growth strategy? The case of the wood industry in Oberá, Argentina. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(2), 232-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-11-2013-0197.
Kirat, T. & Lung, Y. (1999). Innovation and proximity: Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 27-38.
Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National Iinnovations systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
Natário, M. M. & Oliveira, P. M. (2018). Portuguese SME innovation sources: Trends of the last decade. 2018 Proceedings, 29, pp. 1-16. Available at https://aisel.aisnet.org/capsi2018/29.
Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Oliveira, P. (2013). A influência do meio local nas dinâmicas de inovação do complexo agroalimentar do Vale do Tejo: Análise e formulação de estratégias territoriais de ação coletiva. Doctoral thesis, ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon (Portugal). Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10071/6378
Oliveira, P. M. & Natário, M. M. (2016). Territorial innovation systems and strategies of collective efficiency: The case of Tagus Valley agro-food complex. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 362-382.
Oliveira, P. & Turčinková, J. (2019). Human capital, innovation and internationalization of micro and small enterprises in rural territory - A case study. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae, 67(2).
Schmitz, H. (1995). Collective efficiency: Growth path for small‐scale industry. The Journal of Development Studies, 31(4), 529-566. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220389508422377.
Torre A. (2014). Proximity relations at the heart of territorial development processes. In A. Torre & F. Wallet (eds), (2014), Regional development and proximity relations, New Horizons in Regional Science, London: Edward Elgar.
Torre, A. & Wallet, F. (2013). Innovation and governance of rural territories. In E. Coudel, H. Devautour, C. T. Soulard, G. Faure & B. Hubert (eds), Renewing innovation systems in agriculture and food: How to go towards more sustainability? Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Torre, A. & Wallet, F. (2015). Towards new paths for regional and territorial development in rural areas. European Planning Studies, 23(4), 650-677.
Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. (2012). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies towards new development paths. 52nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regions in Motion - Breaking the Path", 21-25 August2012. Bratislava, Slovakia, European Regional Science Association (ERSA).
United Nations (2012). Governance and development. Thematic think piece. United Nations System Task Team on the Post 2015 UN Development Agenda.
Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Nova Iorque: Free Press.
World Economic Forum (2019). From linear to circular – Accelerating a proven concept. Available at http://reports.weforum.org/toward-the-circular-economy-accelerating-the-scale-up-across-global-supply-chains/from-linear-to-circular-accelerating-a-proven-concept/#view/fn-11.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zaman, G. (2015). Cultural heritage entrepreneurship (CHE) – Challenges and difficulties. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 188, 3-15.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
