Analysis of the criteria for establishing the existence of an employment relationship of platform workers under the Platform Work Directive – high expectations and limited outcome?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(38)2025.ic-6Keywords:
Platform Work, Employment Status, Platform Work Directive, Platform Workers, Presumption of an Employment Relationship, EU Labour LawAbstract
In this paper, the author critically analyses and evaluates the content of the adopted Platform Work Directive from the perspective of the content of the criteria for the establishment of a presumption of an employment relationship. In doing so, the author also compares the content of the finally adopted Directive with the initial proposal of the Platform Work Directive in 2021. The author concludes that the criteria set out in the 2021 proposal represented a significant advance in the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the criteria for establishing the existence of a presumption of an employment relationship of platform workers. However, due to the impossibility of reaching a political compromise, the criteria in question were dropped from the adopted version of the Directive in 2024, leaving only a more abstract and vague formulation for establishing the existence of a presumption of an employment relationship. It is thus left to the Member States to formulate more concretely the substantive criteria for the existence of a presumption of an employment relationship. Finally, the author elaborates on some of the advantages and disadvantages of the adopted content of the Platform Work Directive.
References
ADAMS-PRASSL, Jeremias, LAULOM, Sylvaine, MANEIRO VÁZQUEZ, Yolanda. The Role of National Courts in Protecting Platform Workers: A Comparative Analysis. In: MIRANDA BOTO, Jose Maria et al. Collective bargaining and the gig economy: a traditional tool for new business models, Oxford etc.: Hart Publishing, 2022, pp. 75-98. ISBN 9781509956197.
ALES, Edoardo. Evidences and Solutions from Three European Countries. Italian Labour Law e-Journal [online]. Vol. 12, no. 1, 2019, pp. 65-70. ISSN 1561-8048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/9697.
ALOISI, Antonio, DE STEFANO, Valerio. Your boss is an algorithm: artificial intelligence, platform work and labour. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022. ISBN 9781509953189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509953219.
ALOISI, Antonio. 'Time Is Running Out' The Yodel Order and Its Implications for Platform Work in the EU, Italian Labour Law e-Journal [online]. Vol. 13, no. 2, 2020, pp. 67-87. ISSN 1561-8048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/11777.
ALOISI, Antonio. Platform work in Europe: Lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead. European Labour Law Journal [online], Vol. 13, no. 1, 2022, pp. 4-29. ISSN 2399-5556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211062557.
AMADO, João Leal, MOREIRA, Teresa Coelho. Plataformas digitais, qualificação do contrato e substituição de estafetas : a “bala de prata”?. Revista Internacional de Direito do Trabalho [online]. Vol. 4, no. 6., 2024, pp. 135-164. ISSN 2184-8815 [last accessed 14. 7. 2025]. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/64531.
ARRUDA DE SOUZA, Monique. Pro-immigrant digital platforms in Portugal: an overview. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies [online]. Vol. 12, No. 1, 2023, pp. 1-17. ISSN: 2280-4056 [last accessed 14. 7. 2025]. Available at: https://ejcls.adapt.it/index.php/ejcls_adapt/article/view/1294.
BJELINSKI RADIĆ, Iva. Critical Reflections on the European Commission's Proposal for a Directive on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu [online]. Vol. 72, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1467-1491. ISSN: 1849-1154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.72.6.05.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Platform workers: Council confirms agreement on new rules to improve their working conditions, 11. 3. 2024 [last accessed 28. 3. 2025]. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/sl/press/press-releases/2024/03/11/platform-workers-council-confirms-agreement-on-new-rules-to-improve-their-working-conditions/ .
COUNTOURIS, Nicola. 'The Concept of 'Worker' in European Labour Law: Fragmentation, Autonomy and Scope', Industrial Law Journal [online]. Vol. 47, no. 2, 2018, pp. 192-225. ISSN 1464-3669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwx014.
DAVIDOV, Guy, ALON-SHENKER, Pnina. The ABC Test: A New Model for Employment Status Determination?. Industrial Law Journal [online]. Vol. 51, no. 2, 2022, pp. 235-276. ISSN 1464-3669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac004.
DAVIDOV, Guy. The Status of Uber Drivers: A Purposive Approach. Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal [online]. Vol. 6, no. 1-2, 2017. ISSN 2255-2081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/sllerj.2017.3921.
DA SILVA, Catarina Marques, MENDONÇA, Jorge Ribeiro. Plataformas Digitais Nas Vestes De Empregador: Os Desafios Da “Uberização” Do Trabalho. Revista Internacional de Direito do Trabalho [online]. Vol. 1, no. 2., 2021, pp. 301-341. ISSN 2184-8815 [last accessed 14. 7. 2025]. Available at: https://idt.fdulisboa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/RIDT_2_3008_vfinal.pdf.
DE STEFANO, Valerio. The rise of the "just-in-time workforce": on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the "gig-economy". International Labour Office: Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 71 [online]. 2016 [last accessed 28. 3. 2025]. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_443267.pdf .
DE STEFANO, Valerio. et al. Platform work and the employment relationship. ILO Working Paper no. 27 [online], 2021, ISSN 2708-3446 [last accessed 28. 3. 2025]. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/working-papers/WCMS_777866/lang--en/index.htm.
DOHERTY, Michael, FRANCA, Valentina. Solving the 'Gig-saw'? Collective Rights and Platform Work. Industrial Law Journal [online]. Vol. 49, no. 3, 2022, pp. 352-376. ISSN 1464-3669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwz026.
DUARTE, Ana Patrícia, CONTREIRAS, Joaquim Pinto, SEABRA, Fernando Miguel. Work-family conflict’s mediating effect on the relationship between job insecurity and job satisfaction in the hospitality industry: Evidence from the Algarve, Portugal. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism [online]. Vol. 23, no. 2, 2024. ISSN: 1533-2853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2024.2285720.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021a). Commission staff working document, Analytical document, Accompanying the document - Consultation document, Second phase consultation of social partners under Article 154 TFEU on a possible action addressing the challenges related to working conditions in platform work C(2021) 4230 final, Brussels, SWD(2021) 143 final, 15. 6. 2021 [last accessed 28. 3. 2025]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24095&langId=en .
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021b). Consultation Document, First phase consultation of social partners under Article 154 TFEU on possible action addressing the challenges related to working conditions in platform work, Brussels, C(2021) 1127 final, 24. 2. 2021 [last accessed 28. 3. 2025]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=23655&langId=en .
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021c). Consultation document, Second phase consultation of social partners under Article 154 TFEU on a possible action addressing the challenges related to working conditions in platform work, Brussels, C(2021) 4230 final, SWD(2021) 143 final, 15. 6. 2021 [last accessed 28. 3. 2025]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24094&langId=en .
FESTI COLTURATO, Ricardo, ROQUE, Isabel. Representation, Regulation and Voice of Immigrant Couriers and Platform Drivers in Portugal. Globalizations [online]. 2025, pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2025.2499421.
FITA ORTEGA, Fernando. The 'App-Based' Employment Relationship: The Spanish Case. In: CARINCI, Maria Teresa et al. Platform Work in Europe: Towards Harmonisation?. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2021, pp. 97-126. ISBN 9781839701641.
FUSCO, Federico. Rethinking the Allocation Criteria of the Labour Law Rights and Protections: A Risk-Based Approach. European Labour Law Journal [online]. Vol 11, no. 2, 2020, pp. 131-141. ISSN 2399-5556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952520905152.
GRUBER-RISAK, Martin. Classification of Platform Workers: A Scholarly Perspective. In: GYULAVÁRI, Tamás, MENEGATTI, Emanuelle. Decent Work in the Digital age: European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford etc.: Hart Publishing, 2022, pp. 85-104. ISBN 9781509958276.
HENDRICKX, Frank. Regulating New Ways of Working: From the New 'Wow' to the New 'How'. European Labour Law Journal [online]. Vol. 9, no. 2, 2018, pp. 195-205. ISSN 2399-5556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952518781449.
IOANNIS, Lianos, COUNTOURIS, Nicola, DE STEFANO, Valerio. Re-Thinking the Competition Law/Labour Law Interaction: Promoting a Fairer Labour Market, European Labour Law Journal [online], Vol. 10, no. 3, 2019, pp. 291-333. ISSN 2399-5556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519872322.
KATSABIAN, Tammy, DAVIDOV, Guy. Flexibility, choice, and labour law: the challenge of on-demand platforms, University of Toronto Law Journal [online]. Vol. 73, no. 3, 2023, pp. 348-379. ISSN: 1710-1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2021-0113.
MENEGATTI, Emanuele. The Classification of Platform Workers through the Lens of Judiciaries: A Comparative Analysis. In: GYULAVÁRI, Tamás, MENEGATTI, Emanuelle. Decent Work in the Digital age: European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford etc.: Hart Publishing, 2022, pp. 105-126. ISBN 9781509958276.
MOREIRA, Teresa Coelho. Article 12-A and the presumption of an employment relationship for digital labour platforms. The Official Blog of UNIO-EU Law Journal. 2024 [last accessed 10. 7. 2025]. Available at: https://officialblogofunio.com/2023/04/27/article-12-a-and-the-presumption-of-an-employment-relationship-for-digital-labour-platforms/#_ftn2.
MOREIRA, Teresa Coelho. O trabalho nas plataformas digitais e a presunção de laboralidade. Revista Internacional de Direito do Trabalho [online]. Vol. 2, no. 3., 2022, pp. 341-372. ISSN 2184-8815 [last accessed 14. 7. 2025]. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/64531.
POLAJŽAR, Aljoša. Access of platform workers to collective rights - the fall of the binary divide?. Journal of Jurisprudence and Legal Practice [online]. Vol. 32, no. 2, 2024, pp. 195-212. ISSN 1210-9126. DOI: 10.5817/CPVP2024-2-1.
PRASSL, Jeremias. Humans As a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. ISBN 9780198797012.
RATTI, Luca. Crowdwork and Work On-Demand in the European Legal Framework: Promises and Expectations. In: CARINCI, Maria Teresa et al. Platform Work in Europe: Towards Harmonisation?. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2021, pp. 173-208. ISBN 9781839701641.
RIBEIRO, Ana Teresa. An employment presumption for platform work – the Portuguese experience. Global Workplace Law & Policy Blog. 2024b [last accessed 10. 7. 2025]. Available at: https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/global-workplace-law-and-policy/an-employment-presumption-for-platform-work-the-portuguese-experience/.
RIBEIRO, Ana Teresa. Labour law in Portugal during the pandemic: main measures and developments. Italian Labour Law e-Journal [online]. Vol. 15, no. 2, 2022. ISSN 1561-8048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/15984.
RIBEIRO, Ana Teresa. The Portuguese employment presumption for platform work – a step in the right direction?. 2024a [last accessed 14. 7. 2025]. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/ATRibeiro%20-%20ETUI%20February.pdf.
RIBEIRO, Ana Teresa. The Scope of Representation of Trade Unions in Portugal: A New Reality?. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies [online]. Vol. 12, No. 3, 2023, pp. 82-92. ISSN: 2280-4056 [last accessed 10. 7. 2025]. Available at: https://ejcls.adapt.it/index.php/ejcls_adapt/article/view/1454.
ROQUE, Isabel, BOAVIDA, Nuno. Perceptions of vulnerability and precariousness of Airbnb workers in Portugal. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation [online]. Vol. 18, no. 2, 2024, pp. 245-265. ISSN: 1745-6428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.18.2.245.
ROQUE, Isabel, DO CARMO, Renato Miguel, CALEIRAS, Jorge, DE ASSIS, Rodrigo Vieira. Trajectories of precariousness of tuk-tuk drivers in Portugal: A case study. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation [online]. Vol. 18, no. 2, 2024, pp. 176-195. ISSN: 1745-6428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.18.2.176.
SENATORI, Iacopo. EU Law and Digitalisation of Employment Relations. In: GYULAVÁRI, Tamás, MENEGATTI, Emanuelle. Decent Work in the Digital age: European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford etc.: Hart Publishing, 2022, pp. 57-81. ISBN 9781509958276.
SENČUR PEČEK, Darja, FRANCA, Valentina. From student work to false self-employment: how to combat precarious work in Slovenia?. In: KENNER, Jeff, FLORCZAK, Izabela, OTTO, Marta. Precarious Work: The Challenge for Labour Law in Europe. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. ISBN 9781788973250.
TODOLÍ-SIGNES, Adrian. The End of the Subordinate Worker? The On-Demand Economy, the Gig Economy, and the Need for Protection for Crowdworkers, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations [online]. Vol. 33, no. 2, 2017, pp. 241-268. ISSN 1875-838X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2017011.
CASE-LAW AND LEGAL ACTS:
C-66/85 Lawrie-Blum, of 3 July 1986. ECLI:EU:C:1986:284.
C-413/13 FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media, of 4 December 2014. ECLI:EU:C:2014:2411.
C-229/14 Balkaya, of 9 July 2015. ECLI:EU:C:2015:455.
C-692/19 Yodel Delivery Network Ltd, of 22 April 2020. ECLI:EU:C:2020:288.
European Parliament and Council. Directive (EU) 2024/2831 of 23 October 2024 on improving working conditions in platform work. OJ L, 2024/2831, 11. November 2024.
European Commission. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work. COM(2021) 762 final, 2021/0414 (COD), 9 December 2021 [last accessed 28. 3. 2025]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021PC0762 .
Lei n.º 13/2023, de 3 de abril, Altera o Código do Trabalho e legislação conexa, no âmbito da agenda do trabalho digno Diário da República n.º 66/2023, Série I de 2023-04-03, pp. 2-85.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aljoša Polajžar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
