Dissociative Identity Disorder and the Law: A Comparative Analysis of Criminal Responsibility in England and Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(38)2025.ic-14Keywords:
Dissociative Identity Disorder, criminal responsibility, diminished responsibility, functional assessment, forensic psychiatry, comparative criminal lawAbstract
Dissociative Identity Disorder presents unique challenges to criminal justice systems, particularly in cases where fragmented identity impairs cognitive awareness or volitional control. This article explores how two contrasting legal systems one common law, one civil law approach the issue of criminal responsibility in defendants diagnosed with DID. Employing a mixed-method strategy that combines doctrinal and comparative legal analysis with an empirical survey of 372 individuals using the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II), the study highlights the limitations of binary models of capacity and the under-recognition of partial mental impairment. It argues for a functional, capacity-based framework that assesses the cognitive and volitional state of the operative identity at the time of the offence. The article recommends legal reforms to incorporate intermediate responsibility categories, enhance forensic standards, and permit adversarial testing of psychiatric evidence. These findings contribute to the evolving discourse on mental health and criminal culpability, offering comparative insights for more proportionate and scientifically informed adjudication
References
M’NAGHTEN’S Case (1843) 10 Cl & Fin 200; 8 ER 718 In., 1843.
AATS REINDERS, ERS NIJENHUIS, AMJ PAANS, J KORF, et al. One brain, two selves. Neuroimage, 2003, 12(4), 2119-2125.
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). In., 2013.
APPEAL, C. O. R v Byrne [1960] 2 QB 396. In., 1960, vol. 2025.
APPEAL, C. O. R v Burgess [1991] 2 QB 92. In., 1991, vol. 2025.
BRAND, B. AND R. J. LOEWENSTEIN. Dissociative disorders: An overview of assessment, phenomenology, and treatment. In Psychiatric Times. 2010.
CARLSON, E. B. AND F. W. PUTNAM An update on the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Dissociative Disorders, 1993, 6(1).
DAVID ORMEROD CBE, Q. (HON) AND K. LAIRD Smith, Hogan, and Ormerod's Criminal Law (16th edn). Edtion ed.: Oxford University Press, 2021. ISBN 9780198849704.
DELL, P. F. A New Model of Dissociative Identity Disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 2006, 29(1), 1-26.
DELL, P. F. AND J. A. O'NEIL Dissociation and the Dissociative Disorders: DSM-V and Beyond. Routledge. Psychiatry Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 2010, 73(3), 288-294.
DORAHY, M., B. BL, K. C. SAR V , S. P, et al. Dissociative identity disorder: An empirical overview. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2014.
DORAHY, M. J., R. J. C. HUNTJENS, R. J. MARSH, B. JOHNSON, et al. The Sense of Self Over Time: Assessing Diachronicity in Dissociative Identity Disorder, Psychosis and Healthy Comparison Groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021.
EASDALE, M. Assigning Criminal Responsibility to Defendants with Dissociative Identity Disorder. Capital University Law Review, 2022, 50(4), 765–799.
EASTMAN, N. AND C. CAMPBELL Neuroscience and legal determination of criminal responsibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2006, 7, 311-318.
FLETCHER, G. P. Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. Edtion ed.: Oxford University Press 1998.
FOOTE, B., Y. SMOLIN, M. KAPLAN, M. E. LEGATT, et al. Prevalence of dissociative disorders in psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry, 2006, 163(4), 623-629.
HART, O. V. D. AND R. HORST The dissociation theory of Pierre Janet. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1989, 2.
HUNTJENS, R. J. C., M. L. PETERS, L. WOERTMAN, O. V. D. HART, et al. Memory transfer for emotionally valenced words in dissociative identity disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2006, 45(5), 775-789.
JOHNSTON, E. L., K. D. RUNYAN, F. J. SILVA AND F. MALDONADO FUENTES Diminished Criminal Responsibility: A Multinational Comparative Review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2023, 91.
KLUFT, R. P. Dissociative Disorders. In Handbook of Aggressive and Destructive Behavior in Psychiatric Patients. 1994.
LOFTUS, E. F. AND D. DAVIS Recovered Memories. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology in the Schools, 2006, 2, 469-489.
M.D., R. P. K. Clinical Presentations of Multiple Personality Disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 1991, 14(3).
MYCHAILYSZYN, M. P., B. L. B. , A. R. WEBERMANN, V. ŞAR, et al. Differentiating Dissociative from Non-Dissociative Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D). Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 2020, 22.
NATIONAL AASEMBLY. Penal Code. In., 2015.
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY. Criminal Code. In., 2015.
PADFIELD, N. AND J. BILD Text and Materials on the Criminal Justice Process (5th Edition). Edtion ed., 2016. ISBN 9781138918344.
PIETKIEWICZ, I. Revisiting False-Positive and Imitated Dissociative Identity Disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021.
PUTNAM, F. W. The Physiological Investigation of Multiple Personality Disorder: A Review. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 1984// 1984, 7.
PUTNAM, F. W. The Clinical Phenomenology of Multiple Personality Disorder: Review of 100 Recent Cases. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 1986// 1986, 47.
PUTNAM, F. W. Dissociative phenomena. American Psychiatric Press review of psychiatry,, 1991, 10, 145-160.
REINDERS, A. A. T. S., NIJENHUIS, E. R. S., QUAK, J., KORF, J., HAAKSMA, J., & PAANS, A. M. J. Psychobiological Characteristics of Dissociative Identity Disorder: A Symptom Provocation Study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2006, 114(3), 233–242.
REINDERS, A. A. T. S., A. T. M. WILLEMSEN, J. A. D. BOER, H. P. J. VOS, et al. Opposite brain emotion-regulation patterns in identity states of dissociative identity disorder: a PET study and neurobiological model. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 2014, 223(3).
ROBINSON, P. H. Structure and Function in Criminal Law. Edtion ed.: Oxford University Press 1997.
ROSS, C. A., S. HEBER AND G. ANDERSON The dissociative disorders interview schedule American Journal of Psychiatry, 1991, 147(12).
ROSS, C. A., G. R. NORTON AND K. WOZNEY Multiple Personality Disorder: An Analysis of 236 Cases. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1989 1989, 34.
SAKS, E. R. AND S. H. BEHNKE Jekyll on trial: Multiple personality disorder and criminal law. Edtion ed.: NYU Press, 1997.
SARTORIUS, N., A. JABLENSKY, A. KORTEN, G. ERNBERG, et al. Early manifestations and first-contact incidence of schizophrenia in different cultures: A preliminary report on the initial evaluation phase of the WHO Collaborative Study on Determinants of Outcome of Severe Mental Disorders. Psychological Medicine, 2009, 16(4), 909-928.
SCHALOCK, R. L. B.-D., SHARON A.; BRADLEY, VALERIE J.; BUNTINX, WIL H. E.; COULTER, DAVID L.; CRAIG, ELLIS M.; GOMEZ, SHARON C.; LACHAPELLE, YVES; LUCKASSON, RUTH; REEVE, ALYA; SHOGREN, KARRIE A.; SNELL, MARTHA E.; SPREAT, SCOTT; TASSE, MARC J.; THOMPSON, JAMES R.; VERDUGO-ALONSO, MIGUEL A.; WEHMEYER, MICHAEL L.; YEAGER, MARK H. Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. Eleventh Edition. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2010.
SINNOTT-ARMSTRONG, W. AND S. BEHNKE Criminal law and multiple personality disorder: The vexing problems of personhood and responsibility. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2001.
STEINBERG, M. Structured Clinical Interview for Dsm-IV Dissociative Disorders. Edtion ed., 1994.
STEINBERG, M. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D). Edtion ed., 2023. ISBN 978-1-61537-342-0.
TANDON, R., NASRALLAH, H. A., & KESHAVAN, M. S. Schizophrenia, “Just the Facts” 5. Treatment and prevention Past, present, and future. Schizophrenia Research, 2010, 112(1-3).
UK. Mental Health Act 1983, c. 20. In., 1983.
UK. Coroners and Justice Act 2009, c. 25, s. 52. In., 2009.
WALKER, N. Crime and Insanity in England: The Historical Perspective. The American Journal of Legal History, 1968, 14(1), 82-85.
ZOU, J. Y. AND L. SCHIEBINGER AI can be sexist and racist it’s time to make it fair 2018, 559(7714), 324–326.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Duy Thuyen TRINH, Thi Cam Ha DINH, Thi Ngoc Kim TRAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
