Personalized Alliances and Informal Networks in Populist Foreign Policy: The Case of Viktor Orbán
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(39.1)2026.ic-10Palabras clave:
foreign policy, populism, politicisation, personalisation, HungaryResumen
Populist leaders increasingly challenge alliances by prioritizing personal ties over institutional commitments. This paper examines how Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán constructed international partnerships in his foreign policy discourse. Using network and discourse analysis of his posts on X between June 2023 and June 2025 (N=638), the study identifies central actors, their characterisation, and patterns of partnership-building. Findings indicate that Orbán’s discourse on international entities was shaped by politicisation, personalisation and structural constraints. Politicisation projected domestic friend–enemy narratives internationally, personalisation privileged leader-to-leader ties and links to popular non-state figures, while structural constraints weakened partnerships by exposing them to the interests of larger powers and the opportunistic behaviour of populist allies.
Citas
ÁGH, Attila, 1999. Europeanization of policy-making in East Central Europe: The Hungarian approach to EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy. 6(5), 839–854. DOI 10.1080/135017699343414.
BASTIAN, Mathieu, HEYMANN, Sebastien és JACOMY, Mathieu, 2009. Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 3(1), 361–362. DOI 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937.
BCW TWIDIPLOMACY, 2021. Twiplomacy Study 2020. https://www.twiplomacy.com/twiplomacy-study-2020
BÉKÉS, Csaba, 2023. Hungary and the Dissolution of the Warsaw Pact (1988–1991). Journal of Cold War Studies. 25(4), 4–23. DOI 10.1162/jcws_a_01168.
BOUCHER, Jean-Christophe and THIES, Cameron G., 2019. “I Am a Tariff Man”: The Power of Populist Foreign Policy Rhetoric under President Trump. The Journal of Politics. 81(2), 712–722. DOI 10.1086/702229.
CADIER, David, 2023. Foreign Policy as the Continuation of Domestic Politics by Other Means: Pathways and Patterns of Populist Politicization. Foreign Policy Analysis. 20(1). DOI 10.1093/fpa/orad035.
CHRYSSOGELOS, Angelos, 2017. Populism in Foreign Policy. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.467.
CSIGÓ, Péter and MERKOVITY, Norbert, 2016. Hungary: Home of Empty Populism. In: AALBERG, Toril, ESSER, Frank, REINEMANN, Carsten, STRÖMBÄCK, Jesper és de VREESE, Claes H., eds. Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge, 299–310.
DESTRADI, Sandra, CADIER, David and PLAGEMANN, Johannes, 2021. Populism and foreign policy: a research agenda (Introduction). Comparative European Politics. 19(6), 663–682. DOI 10.1057/s41295-021-00255-4.
DESTRADI, Sandra, PLAGEMANN, Johannes and TAŞ, Hakkı, 2022. Populism and the politicisation of foreign policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 24(3), 475–492. DOI 10.1177/13691481221075944.
DUDLÁK, Tamás, 2023. Béke minden áron: Oroszország ukrajnai inváziója a magyar kormány diskurzusában. PÓLUSOK. 4(2), 56–79. DOI 10.15170/PSK.2023.04.02.04.
EIRAN, Ehud, ISH-SHALOM, Piki and KORNPROBST, Markus, 2025. Populism in international relations: champion diplomacy. Journal of International Relations and Development. 28(1), 80–104. DOI 10.1057/s41268-025-00344-x.
FARKAS, Xénia and BENE, Márton, 2022. Orbán Viktor vizuális és verbális populista stílusa a Facebookon. Politikatudományi Szemle. 31(3), 82–108. DOI 10.30718/POLTUD.HU.2022.3.82.
GIURLANDO, Paul, 2021. Populist foreign policy: the case of Italy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 27(2), 251–267. DOI 10.1080/11926422.2020.1819357.
GRESKOVITS, Béla, 2020. Rebuilding the Hungarian Right through Conquering Civil Society: The Civic Circles Movement. East European Politics. 36(2), 247–266. DOI 10.1080/21599165.2020.1718657.
HETTYEY, András, 2024. Unique, better, model, leader: Claims of exceptionality in Hungary’s foreign policy and beyond. New Perspectives. 32(4), 368–385. DOI 10.1177/2336825X241282597.
JESZENSZKY, Géza, 2007. Hungary’s Foreign Policy Dilemmas after Regaining Sovereignty. Society and Economy, 29(1), 43–64. DOI 10.1556/socec.29.2007.1.2
KACZIBA, Péter, 2023. Magyar kormányzati szereplők digitális diplomáciai tevékenysége a Twitteren (2021–2022). PÓLUSOK. 4(1), 2–26. DOI 10.15170/PSK.2023.04.01.01.
LACLAU, Ernesto, 2005. Populism: What’s in a Name? In: PANIZZA, Francisco, ed. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, 33–49.
LAKE, David A., 1999. Entangling relations: American foreign policy in its century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
LONER, Enzo, 2023. Enemies and friends: The instrumental social construction of populist identity through Twitter in Italy at the time of COVID-19. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology. 10(2), 279–308. DOI 10.1080/23254823.2022.2148780.
MENDONÇA, Ricardo F. and CAETANO, Renato Duarte, 2021. Populism as Parody: The Visual Self Representation of Jair Bolsonaro on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 26(1), 210–235. DOI 10.1177/1940161220959552.
MORROW, James D., 1991. Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances. American Journal of Political Science. 35(4), 904–933. DOI 10.2307/2111499.
MOS, Martijn and MACEDO PIOVEZAN, Isadora, 2024. Leadership in international populism: How Viktor Orbán’s Hungary shows the way. New Perspectives. 32(4), 329–346. DOI 10.1177/2336825X241282599.
MUDDE, Cas, 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. DOI 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
MÜLLER, Patrick and GAZSI, Dániel, 2023. Populist Capture of Foreign Policy Institutions: The Orbán Government and the De-Europeanization of Hungarian Foreign Policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 61(2), 397–415. DOI 10.1111/jcms.13377.
ORBÁN, Balázs. 2024. Hussar Cut: The Hungarian Strategy for Connectivity. MCC Press, Budapest.
ÖZDAMAR, Özgür and YANIK, Lerna K., 2024. Populist hyperpersonalization and politicization of foreign policy institutions. International Affairs. 100(5), 1835–1856. DOI 10.1093/ia/iiae181.
PLAGEMANN, Johannes and DESTRADI, Sandra, 2019. Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of India. Foreign Policy Analysis. 15(2), 283–301. DOI 10.1093/fpa/ory010.
RIVAS-DE-ROCA, Rubén, Concha PÉREZ-CURIEL and Mar GARCÍA-GORDILLO, 2022. Building extreme right discourses on Twitter for non-campaign periods: insights from populist leaders across Europe. Observatorio (OBS) Journal. 16(4), 23–41.
SCHMIDT, Andrea and GLIED, Viktor, 2024. Pragmatic foreign policy of Hungary in the shadow of the Russian-Ukrainian war. Eastern Journal of European Studies. 15(SI), 247–267. DOI 10.47743/ejes-2024-SI12.
SCHMUCK, Desirée and HAMELEERS, Michael, 2020. Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods. Information, Communication & Society. 23(10), 1531–1548. DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909.
SNYDER, Glenn H., 1984. The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics. World Politics. 36(4), 461–495. DOI 10.2307/2010183.
SONNEVEND, Júlia and KÖVESDI, Veronika, 2024. More Than Just a Strongman: The Strategic Construction of Viktor Orbán’s Charismatic Authority on Facebook. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 29(4), 891–918. DOI 10.1177/19401612231179120.
TAŞ, Hakkı, 2022. The formulation and implementation of populist foreign policy: Turkey in the Eastern Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics. 27(5), 563–587. DOI 10.1080/13629395.2020.1833160.
TERRY, George Spencer and MAKARYCHEV, Andrey, 2021. Performative Diplomacy and Popular Geopolitics: The Case of Russian Anti-COVID Assistance to Italy. Problems of Post-Communism. 69(1), 83–91. DOI 10.1080/10758216.2021.1890998.
VARGA, Mihály and BUZOGÁNY, Aron, 2021. The Foreign Policy of Populists in Power: Contesting Liberalism in Poland and Hungary. Geopolitics. 26(5), 1442–1463. DOI 10.1080/14650045.2020.1734564.
VISNOVITZ, Péter and JENNE, Erin K., 2021. Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020. Comparative European Politics. 19(6), 683–702. DOI 10.1057/s41295-021-00256-3.
WAJNER, Daniel F., 2022. The populist way out: Why contemporary populist leaders seek transnational legitimation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 24(3), 416–436. DOI 10.1177/13691481211069345.
WALT, Stephen M., 1987. Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
WOJCZEWSKI, Thorsten, 2024. The international cooperation of the populist radical right: building counter-hegemony in international relations. International Relations. DOI 10.1177/00471178231222888.
ZÜRN, Michael, 2014. The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review. 6(1), 47–71. DOI 10.1017/S1755773912000276.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Péter KACZIBA, Kata MURÁNYI

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.



