Kinship Care in the Portuguese Law: Meanings and Challenges

Autores

  • João CARVALHO REMIT - Portucalense University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0683-296X
  • Paulo DELGADO InED - Higher School of Education of the Polytechnic Institute of Porto
  • Joana SOARES Group of Research and Intervention in Adoption and Out-of-Home Care
  • Rachel BAPTISTA Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-409X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(39.2)2026.ic-14

Palavras-chave:

Kinship Care, Foster Care, Out-of-Home Care, Law for the protection of children and young people at risk, Law, Portugal

Resumo

Policies regarding Kinship Care (KC) constitute a distinctive aspect of the Portuguese child protection system, as the placement of children with extended family members is not formally recognized as out-of-home care. KC is officially designated as “Support from Another Family Member” (SAFM). SAFM has been largely invisible in national statistics, raising concerns regarding the adequacy of professional assessment, supervision, and the protection of children’s rights and well-being. This study aimed to characterize the profiles of families and children in SAFM and to identify the primary needs and challenges faced by children and caregivers. A quantitative approach was employed with professionals from the Commissions for the Protection of Children and Youth. Findings indicate that many children in SAFM present specific health or behavioral needs, yet technical support for caregivers remains severely limited, with minimal access to formal training. In addition, families often face high socioeconomic vulnerability. Despite these challenges, children demonstrate notable improvements in psychological well-being, behavior, and school performance. Moving forward, the recent legislative reform provides an opportunity to address financial disparities, but it remains critical to formally recognize SAFM as out-of-home care and to ensure ongoing supervision and mandatory caregiver training to safeguard children’s rights, stability, and development.

Biografia Autor

Paulo DELGADO, InED - Higher School of Education of the Polytechnic Institute of Porto

Professor Coordenador Principal, Doutorado em Educação, Licenciado em Direito. InED-Escola Superior de Educação do Instituto Politécnico do Porto

Referências

AKIN, Becci A., et al. 2019. Randomized trial of PMTO in foster care: Six-month child well-being outcomes. Research on Social Work Practice, 29, pp. 206-222. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516669822

BAI, Grace J., et al. 2016. The protective effect of kinship involvement on the adjustment of youth in foster care. Child Maltreatment, 21, pp. 288–297. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077559516669043

BARBOSA-DUCHARNE, Maria and SOARES, Joana. 2021. Abordagem ecológica da formação em acolhimento familiar [Ecological approach on foster care training]. In. Acolhimento familiar de crianças e jovens em perigo: Um manual para profissionais [Family foster care: A handbook for professionals], pp. 61-82, ISBN: 978-989-693-128-5. PACTOR - Edições de Ciências Sociais, Forenses e da Educação.

BARBOSA-DUCHARNE, Maria and SOARES, Joana, 2022. Residential care for children and youth in Portugal: A change as necessary as urgent. In. Revitalizing Residential Care for Children and Youth. Cross-National Trends and Challenges, pp. 256-272, Oxford University Press. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197644300.003.0018

BELL, Tessa and ROMANO, Elisa. Permanency and safety among children in foster family and kinship care: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 2017, 18, pp. 268–286. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1524838015611673

BERNEDO, Isabel and FUENTES, Maria. 2010. Necesidades de apoyo y satisfacción en los acogimientos con familia extensa. Anales de Psicología, 26(1), pp. 95-103. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16713758012

CARVALHO, Maria João Leote de, and CRUZ, Hugo. Promoção da Autonomia em Crianças e Jovens em Acolhimento em Instituição. In. AUTONOMIA – Desafios e práticas no acolhimento de jovens em instituição, 2015, pp. 4-15. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

CHENG, Tyrone and LO, Celia, 2021. With their children placed in kinship care, did parents get the services they needed? Children and Youth Services Review, 121, 105850. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105850

CLARK, Christine and TAYLOR, Emily A., 2026. “Caring for the carers”: Compassion fatigue and associated factors in foster and kinship carers. Children and Youth Services Review, 181, 108692. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108692

COLEMAN, Kanisha and WU, Qi, 2016. Kinship care and service utilization: A review of predisposing, enabling, and need factors. Children and Youth Services Review, 61, pp. 201–210. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.014

CNPDPCJ – Comissão Nacional de Promoção dos Direitos e Proteção das Crianças e Jovens, 2025. Relatório anual de avaliação da atividade das Comissões de Proteção de Crianças e Jovens — 2024. Available from: https://www.cnpdpcj.gov.pt/relatorio-atividades

CONNOLLY, Marie, et al., 2017. A kinship care practice framework: Using a life course approach. British Journal of Social Work, 47, pp. 87–105. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw041

CWIG – Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2018. Home study requirements for prospective foster parents. State statutes: Current through February 2018. Washington, DC: Children’s Bureau. Available from: https://www.childwelfare.gov/resources/home-study-requirements-prospective-foster-parents/

DEL VALLE, Jorge F., BRAVO, Amaia and LÓPEZ, Mónica, 2009. El acogimiento familiar en España: Implantación y retos actuales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 30(1), pp. 33–41.

DELAP, Emily, et al., 2024. How to support kinship care: Lessons learnt across the world. Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond, 11(2), pp. 224–231. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/23493003241259530

DELGADO, Paulo, 2023. Foster care in Portugal: Outcomes, needs, and challenges for deinstitutionalization. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 43, pp. 107–119. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2023.43.07

DELGADO, Paulo and GERSÃO, Eliana, 2018. O acolhimento de crianças e jovens no novo quadro legal. Novos discursos, novas práticas? Análise Social, 226, pp. 112–134.

DELGADO, Paulo, et al., 2019. The subjective well-being of Portuguese children in foster care, residential care and children living with their families: Challenges and implications for a child care system still focused on institutionalization. Child Indicators Research, 13(1), pp. 67–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09652-4

FARMER, Elaine and MOYERS, Sue, 2008. Kinship care: Fostering effective family and friends’ placements. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

FUENTES-PELÁEZ, Nuria, et al., 2024. Differences in the evaluation and satisfaction with foster care between kinship and non-kin foster carers. Journal of Family Studies, 30(2), pp. 304–323. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2023.2223185

GARCÍA-BERMEJO, Tania and FUENTES, Juan L., 2023. La orientación escolar con familias en riesgo psicosocial: Análisis de la alianza educativa con acogimientos en familia extensa. Revista Complutense de Educación, 34(2), pp. 461–470. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rced.83671

GILLIGAN, Robbie, 2019. The family foster care system in Ireland – Advances and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, pp. 221–228. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.008

HALLETT, Nutmeg, GARSTANG, Joanna and TAYLOR, Julie, 2023. Kinship care and child protection in high-income countries: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), pp. 632–645. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211036073

HASSALL, Alison, et al., 2021. Does kinship vs. foster care better promote connectedness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(4), pp. 813–832. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-021-00352-6

HILL, Louise, GILLIGAN, Robbie and CONNELLY, Graham, 2019. How did kinship care emerge as a significant form of placement for children in care? A comparative study of the experience in Ireland and Scotland. Children and Youth Services Review, 117, 104368. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.06.003

ISS – Instituto de Segurança Social, I.P., 2025. CASA 2024: Caraterização anual da situação de acolhimento de crianças e jovens. Lisboa: ISS, I.P. Available from: https://www.garantiainfancia.gov.pt/documents/37502/0/Relat%C3%B3rio+Casa+2024/d672f9d9-ef67-474c-8b78-65dee1f040bb

JAMES, Melissa, 2025. The changing face of Australian foster care: Critical steps to ensure kinship works. Australian Social Work, 78(4), pp. 515–520. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2025.2510292

JEDWAB, Merav, XU, Yanfeng and SHAW, Terry, 2020. Kinship care first? Factors associated with placement moves in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105104. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105104

LLOSADA-GISTAU, Joan, CASAS, Ferran and MONTSERRAT, Carme, 2019. The subjective well-being of children in kinship care. Psicothema, 31, pp. 149–155. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.302

LÓPEZ, Mónica, et al., 2010. El acogimiento en família ajena en España. Una evaluación de la práctica y sus resultados. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33(2), pp. 269–280. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1174/021037010791114616

MATEOS, Ainoa, et al., 2012. The perception adolescents in kinship foster care have of their own needs. Review of Research and Social Intervention, 38, pp. 25–41. Available from: https://www.rcis.ro/images/documente/rcis38_02.pdf

MONTSERRAT, Carme, 2014. Kinship care in Spain: Messages from research. Child & Family Social Work, 19, pp. 367–376. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12028

OTT, Eleanor, et al., 2024. What interventions improve outcomes for kinship carers and the children in their care: Systematic review. London: Foundations – What Works Centre for Children & Families. Available from: https://foundations.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/systematic-review-kinship-care-practice-guide.pdf

PALACIOS, Jesús, GILLIGAN, Robbie, 2018. Crianças portuguesas maltratadas pelas suas famílias e pelo Estado. Público, 12 de dezembro de 2018. Available from: https://www.publico.pt/2018/12/12/sociedade/opiniao/criancas-portuguesas-maltratadas-familias-estado-1853533

SIO – Subcomissão de Igualdade de Oportunidades, 2006. Relatório das audições efectuadas no âmbito da avaliação dos sistemas de acolhimento, protecção e tutelares de crianças e jovens. Lisboa: Assembleia da República. Available from: https://www.oa.pt/upl/%7Bfb8145aa-a76b-4e10-9413-ed5f50d12481%7D.pdf

SKOGLUND, Jeanette, MABILLE, Geraldine and THØRNBLAD, Renee, 2024. Contact with parents from childhood to adulthood – A longitudinal study of children in kinship care and non-kinship care. European Journal of Social Work, 27(3), pp. 464–477. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2208768

TRUBEY, Rob, et al., 2024. Effectiveness of mental health and wellbeing interventions for children and young people in foster, kinship, and residential care: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(4), pp. 2829–2844. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241227987

UNICEF and EUROCHILD, 2021. Better data for better child protection systems in Europe: Mapping how data on children in alternative care are collected, analysed and published across 28 European countries. Florence: UNICEF Europe and Central Asia Regional Office. Available from: https://eurochild.org/uploads/2022/02/UNICEF-DataCare-Technical-Report-Final-1.pdf

UNITED NATIONS, 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

VIS, Svein A., et al., 2016. Social functioning and mental health among children who have been living in kinship and non-kinship foster care: Results from an 8-year follow-up with a Norwegian sample. Child & Family Social Work, 21, pp. 557–567. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12180

WASHINGTON, Tyreasa, et al., 2018. Psychosocial factors and behavioral health outcomes among children in foster and kinship care: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 90, pp. 118–133. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.04.030

WINOKUR, Marc, HOLTAN, Amy and BATCHELDER, Keri, 2018. Systematic review of kinship care effects on safety, permanency, and well-being outcomes. Research on Social Work Practice, 28, pp. 19–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515620843

WU, Qi, et al., 2023. Strength and resilience for kinship caregivers raising children: A scoping review. Societies, 13(12), 249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13120249

Downloads

Publicado

2026-06-12

Como Citar

CARVALHO, J., DELGADO, P., SOARES, J., & BAPTISTA, R. (2026). Kinship Care in the Portuguese Law: Meanings and Challenges. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 2(39), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(39.2)2026.ic-14