Is Muscle Oxygen Saturation related to Perceived Exertion?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.31876

Keywords:

Bodyweight exercise, Muscular Oxygen Saturation, Rating of Pereived Effort, Heart Rate

Abstract

Muscle Oxygen Saturation (SmO2) is a physiological indicator of the amount of oxygen inside the muscle. We can observe almost immediately the decrease in SmO2 when a muscle contracts, and when the contraction stops, its recovery is also observable. Some adaptations to exercise include having lower baseline values of SmO2, as the muscle does not require as much oxygen consumption, an ability to consume less oxygen during exercise, and/or the ability to maintain performance with lower levels of SmO2 during exercise. A faster muscle reoxygenation is also observed in subjects with higher training levels. All considered, this study aimed to correlate the cardio and muscle perceived exertion (RPEc and RPEm, respectively) registered immediately after exercise with SmO2 levels and Heart Rate (HR). Seventeen healthy adults participated in this study (age=25.6±2.8yrs; body mass=74.9±9.0kg; height=175±7cm; BMI=24.7±4.9kg/m2; VL skinfold=13.2±4.8mm). A familiarisation session for each exercise (squat and lunge) was conducted, followed by two sessions, on separate days, where the six variations were held in random order for 90 seconds and 5 minutes rest (cadence 40-60bpm). Exercise variations were chosen so there were isometric, unstable, reactive, single-leg, and different range of motion (RoM).

During sessions, SmO2 was continuously measured using Near Infrared Spectroscopy (Moxy Fortiori Design, Hutchinson, USA) in each vastus lateralis and a Garmin heart rate monitor (HRM3-SS, USA) was used to measure HR. The muscular (RPEm) and cardio (RPEc) rates of perceived exertion were registered immediately after each exercise variation (Borg scale, 6-20).

The results may indicate some relation between RPEc and RPEm, and we can only speculate why there are correlations between HR and RPEc in squats but none in lunges. What these results suggest is that SmO2 alone is not an indicator of the level of exertion of an exercise since its values are not related to the effort perceived by participants.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>