Nurses' involvement in the decision not to resuscitate
scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48492/servir0214.40428Keywords:
Bioethics, Nursing , Resuscitation Orders, Decision makingAbstract
Introduction: The decision not to resuscitate is a medical prescription, although nurses must be included in this, given their greater proximity and knowledge of the patient.
Objectives: Map the available evidence on Nurse involvement in the decision not to resuscitate.
Methods: Literature review, based on the methodological guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute for Scoping Reviews. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established and databases were selected according to their suitability. The search strategy to be applied results from the combination of defined keywords and MeSH descriptors, Boolean operators and truncations. The results will be structured using the PRISMA flowchart. Data extraction will be obtained after applying the automatic method (RYYAN). The methodological quality of the studies included in the review will be assessed using the JBI MAStARY grid. The results obtained will be structured into tables and analyzed.
Results: These will be presented descriptively in tables, thus structuring the results obtained.
Conclusions: The elaboration of the protocol is important to plan the objectives, methods and guide the review, with the expectation of obtaining scientific evidence to answer the starting question and identify possible gaps in the existing literature. It is expected that this protocol will simplify and organize the performance of the scoping review and that it will be a facilitating instrument for the development of studies on Nurse Involvement in the Do Not Resuscitate Decision.
Downloads
References
Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., & Jordan, Z. (2024). JBI Manual para Síntese de Evidências. No JBI. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01
Carneiro, A. H., & Carneiro, R. (2020). DNR A decisão de não reanimar. Jornal de Medicina Interna, 27(2), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.24950/p.vista/277/19/2/2020
França, D., Rego, G., & Nunes, R. (2010). Ordem para não reanimar doentes terminais: dilemas éticos dos Enfermeiros. Revista Bioética, 18(2), 469–481. https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/viewFile/577/551
Goodarzi, A., Sadeghian, E., Babaei, K., & Khodaveisi, M. (2022). Conhecimento, Atitude e Tomada de Decisão dos Enfermeiros da Equipa de Reanimação para a Terminação da Reanimação e Ordem de Não Reanimação. Ethiop J Saúde Sci, 32(2), 413–422. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v32i2.22
Guerra, I. I. R. (2017). Experiências de Enfermeiros numa situação de urgência num serviço de internamento [Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra]. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1415821
Hanson, L. C., & Rodgman, E. (1996). O Uso do Testamento Vital no Fim da Vida. Um Estudo Nacional. Arch Intern Med, 156(9), 1018–1022. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440090128013
Lucas, J. M. (2012). Decisão de não Reanimar um Doente em Cuidados Intensivos - Experiências dos Enfermeiros [Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/1198
Mattos, S. M., Cestari, V. R. F., & Moreira, T. M. M. (2023). Revisão do protocolo de escopo: refinamento do guia PRISMA-ScR. Rev. Enferm UFPI, 12(1). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v12i1.3062
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Revisão sistemática ou revisão do escopo? Orientação para os autores ao escolher entre uma abordagem de revisão sistemática ou de escopo. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(143). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Parecer CJ 065/2023 (2023). https://www.ordemEnfermeiros.pt/media/28319/parecer-cj-n%C2%BA-65-2023_decisa-o-de-na-o-reanimar-dnr.pdf
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Orientações metodológicas atualizadas para a realização de revisões de escopo. JBI Síntese de Evidências, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Telma Quaresma, Beatriz Martins, Mariana Costa, Ludmila Pierdevara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In order to promote the free circulation of knowledge, Servir is open access journal. All its content is available and protected under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0).
The journal allows self-archiving in institutional repositories of all versions, which may become immediately available
