Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The proposal is original and unpublished and is not under review or for publication by another journal or publisher.
  • The "Declaration of Authorship and Authorisation for Publication" has been filled in and signed by all authors.
  • In case of submission to a section with blind peer review (Dossier or Varia), the anonymization of the proposal and the file's metadata was ensured.
  • A separate document is submitted indicating the author's name, institutional affiliation, ORCID iD, institutional address, and e-mail contact.
  • An abstract of up to 100 words (maximum) and six keywords are included, in Portuguese and English.
  • The proposal does not exceed the 10 000 words and is in Microsoft Word format (2MB maximum).
  • The proposal complies with the journal style guidelines (Author Guidelines), follows the «Autor-Date System» of the Chicago Manual of Style (16th edition), and includes the entire list of sources and bibliography.
  • The captions of the images include detailed information (e.g. title, author, date, inventory number, institution, etc.), as well as reference to the sources and credits. The images are provided in jpg or tiff files, with a minimum resolution of 300 dpi's.
  • The author holds, for all the images used in the article, the respective authorizations required by current copyright legislation.
  • Documentation proving the authorisations for the use of the images is submitted.

Author Guidelines

Format requirements

  • Originals should be sent in Word files, in the following format:
    • font Times New Roman, size 12 pt
    • justified alignment
    • 1.5 pt spacing
    • non-indented paragraphs
    • pages numbered sequentially
    • footnotes in automatic numeration.

Length

  • It is recommended that articles do not exceed 10 000 words.

Title, abstract and keywords

  • The title should be clear and concise. Use of a subtitle is optional.
  • The abstract, with a maximum of 100 words, must be submitted in Portuguese and in English.
  • Each article should have between four and six keywords, in Portuguese and in English.

Authorship

  • Articles must be submitted without any indication of the authors’ identity (in a “blinded” version), and accompanied by a separate document with the name of the author, institutional affiliation, current institutional address and e-mail contact, and a brief biographical note (maximum of 200 words).
  • Authors must ensure that articles submitted are anonymized, excluding information that may directly or indirectly identify the authorship, such as:
    • authors' data (names, institutional affiliations, emails, ORCID iD, etc.)
    • information regarding funding, R&D projects, support, acknowledgements, etc.
    • explicit self-references should be avoided. Authors citing their own prior work should discuss it in the third person, either in the text or in the footnotes.
  •  Document metadata provides information on a file's properties, such as authorship, change dates, comments, revisions, etc. Metadata must therefore be removed from the document properties.

Languages of publication and style

  • Articles can be submitted in Portuguese, Spanish, French, English and Italian.
  • Current spelling rules and appropriate style guidelines for each language must be followed.
  • First names and surnames of European origin cited in the body of the text must have updated spelling.
  • The type of quotation marks recommended (angled, curved or straight) will vary according to the language the text is written in. For Portuguese texts the AHAM generally recommend the use of straight angled or French quotation marks («»), and curved or English (“”) for quotations within quotations.
  • Section headings/subheadings in the text must be written in bold.
  • The use of italics is restricted to foreign expressions, and for emphasis in citations.
  • If an article contains words in other alphabets or with diacritical marks, the author must provide the respective software upon submission of the text.

Bibliographical references

  • All references should abide by the Autor-Date System of the Chicago Manual of Style (16th edition).
  • References should be indicated in the body of the text (e.g. Smith 2019, 34).
  • The entire list of sources and bibliography used throughout the text should figure at the end of the articles. It should be arranged in alphabetical order according to the authors’ last names. 
  • URLs and DOIs for online references must be provided.

Citations

  • Citations of documents or texts of up to three lines are included in the body of the text, in quotation marks.
  • Citations that consist of more than three lines should be placed in a separate paragraph, size 11, left indentation of 1.25 cm, single spaced, without quotation marks.
  • Words or terms introduced in the body of citations must be indicated by square brackets - [ ].
  • Omissions of excerpts of citations are indicated by suspension points between square brackets - [...].
  • Citations in any language other than those accepted by the AHAM (Portuguese, Spanish, French, English and Italian) must be original, with a translation into the language of the text provided in a footnote.

Transcription of manuscripts

  • Strict respect for the spelling of the manuscript texts is accepted, their modernization, or also, an intermediary way, as long as the norms of transliteration are specified by the authors.

Footnotes

  • Identified in Hindu-Arabic numerals, footnotes must be written in size 10 and single-spaced.

Illustrations

  • Photographs, drawings, tables, graphs, maps should be submitted in jpg. or tiff files.
  • A minimum resolution of 300 dpi’s is required. The journal is printed in greyscale.
  • A separate file with the list of all the illustrations (images, tables, etc.) sequentially numbered, with captions and sources/ credits, and indication of their exact placement in the text.
  • Callouts for each figure (e.g. “(fig. 1)”) should appear in the text. The place where the illustration is to be inserted must be indicated. Please use the figures captions below as a model:

    [INSERT FIGURE 1 HERE] 

    Gaspar de San Agustín, Conquistas de las Islas Philipinas: La temporal por las armas del Señor Don Phelipe Segundo el Prudente; y la espiritual por los religiosos del Orden de Nuestro Padre San Agustín – Fundación y progressos de su Provincia del Santísimo Nombre de Jesús (Madrid, 1698, Imprenta de Manuel Ruiz de Murga). Url: http://bibliotecadigital.aecid.es/bibliodig/es/consulta/registro.cmd?id=6730. Public domain. Source: Biblioteca Digital AECID.

  • If created in Word, tables and graphs should be embedded in the manuscript. Each table and graph should have a title below. Tables and graphs should be considered illustrations and numbered as such (e.g. “(fig. 3)” instead of “(table 1)”).

Copyrights regarding illustrations

  • It is exclusively the authors’ responsibility to ensure that images have legal authorization to be reproduced according to their copyright status, and authors must assume any expenses incurred.
  • Documentation proving the authorisations for the use of the images must be submitted.

Varia

ARTICLES

Submission of proposals

  • Spontaneous proposals: no specific deadline. The AHAM are permanently open to spontaneous proposals.
  • Proposals resulting from “calls for articles” divulged in the journal’s website and through official channels of CHAM.
  • Proposals of thematic dossiers by invitation of the coordinators and the Editorial Board.

Notification of reception and brief explanation of the procedure

  • The secretary of the Editorial Board is responsible for notifying authors.
  • Authors may be advised at this stage to make formal alterations to their texts in order to comply with AHAM’s “norms of elaboration and presentation of texts”, indicated in "Submissions".
  • Expected deadline for notification: 1 week

First evaluation

  • The selection of texts for publication is done by the Editorial Board. After an initial appraisal of all proposals those eligible for external scientific evaluation are chosen.
  • In this initial evaluation the coordinator of the Editorial Board, advised by a second member of the Board, evaluates the originality, relevance, methodological soundness, currentness of the bibliography, writing style and pertinence of the theme to the profile of the journal.
  • If an agreement is not reached, the case may be discussed by the full Board.
  • Authors are informed of all decisions taken concerning the proposals.
  • A rejection notification will be issued within 15 days after receipt of proposals is formalized.

Preparation of external referees

  • In accordance with standards for international scientific journals, all articles selected in the first evaluation are submitted to two referees for external scientific evaluation. This journal uses double blind peer review to provide double anonymity.
  • Proposals ensuing from formal invitations by coordinators of thematic dossiers or from the Editorial Board are submitted to review by the above mentioned coordinators and coordinator of the Editorial Board. Anexternal referee is also consulted on a double anonymity basis.
    Referees must:
    • be external to the administration and Editorial Board of the AHAM;
    • not have any impediments of an ethical or professional nature that could hinder a correct and impartial evaluation, like belonging to the same institution as an author, or having worked with them in the last three years;
    • be from different institutions, or even from different countries;
    • one of the evaluators must be a native speaker of the language of the text under evaluation.
  • Estimated deadline: one week.

Preparation of materials necessary for the referees

  • Although the authors are requested to omit anything that could indicate their identity, the secretary of the Editorial Board does a second screening before the files sent to the AHAM are converted into a format that guaranties the integrity of the originals.
  • It is also the responsibility of the secretary of the Editorial Board to personalize the evaluation forms.

Selection of referees: confirmation of availability

  • Selected referees are questioned by the Editorial Board about their interest in the proposed subject and their availability to commit to an evaluation within a month.

Evaluation of articles

  • Once an invitation has been accepted, the secretary of the Editorial Board delivers the necessary evaluation material to the referees.
  • The referees must fill in all the fields of the "evaluation form" and substantiate their view about whether the articles are appropriate or not for publication. The referees are also encouraged to make suggestions to the author regarding alterations, development of ideas, or specific aspects that could significantly improve their work. 
  • Once the evaluation form has been filled out, it must be sent to the Editorial Board by e-mail within an agreed time limit.
  • It is up to the Editorial Board, advised by a second member of the board, to interpret the classification resulting from the (collected) evaluations. If feedback from the external evaluators is not unanimous, a decision is taken by the coordinator of the Editorial Board, whereby an opinion may be solicited from a third referee.
  • Based always on the same criteria, the evaluation should be concluded within three months.

Disclosure of results

  • Authors are notified of acceptance or rejection of their articles for publication in the AHAM within a 15 day period after the close of the evaluation process.
  • If alterations are necessary, an additional 2 – 3 week period will be allotted for submission. If there is a substantial amount of recommended alterations, the article may be forwarded to the referee(s) for re-evaluation.

Final adjustments

  • If any aspects are less precise or in divergence with the evaluation, there may be further dialogue between the Editorial Board coordinator and authors of proposals to decide on a set of final adjustments.
  • This stage should not exceed two weeks.

Proof reading

  • A manuscript will be given to the authors for revision and possible inclusion of small corrections. In this stage major alterations in the structure and length of the text are not permitted.
  • The manuscript should be returned to the editorial staff of the AHAM within a maximum period of two weeks.

Free offprint and copy

  • Each author will be given 1 printed copy of the edition of the journal in which his/her text is published, as well as an offprint of the article in digital format.

Documents, Book Reviews and News

Publication of unpublished sources (documents), book reviews and news follows the publishing procedures indicated in "submission of proposals", "notification of reception and brief explanation of the procedure", "proof reading", "free offprint and copy" and "copyright and open access" referring to Varia.

Evaluation

  • Selection of texts is done by the Editorial Board, who read all the proposals and decide whether they will be published.
  • The coordinator of the Editorial Board, advised by a second member of the board, assesses the originality, relevance, methodological soundness, currentness of the bibliography, writing style and pertinence of the subject to the journal´s profile.
  • In the absence of an agreement, the case may be debated by the full Board and/or an external opinion may be solicited.
  • Authors are informed of all decisions concerning the proposals.

Book Reviews

  • The AHAM accept works for review, which must be sent to:
    João de Figueirôa-Rêgo, Anais de História de Além-Mar, CHAM, NOVA FCSH, Av. de Berna 26-C, 1069-061 Lisboa, Portugal.

Privacy Statement

Names and emails provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication and will not be made available for other purposes or to third parties.