Postoperative recovery of blood as an alternative to homologous transfusion in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.8868Keywords:
Blood transfusion, Autologous blood transfusion, ArthroplastyAbstract
Orthopedic surgeries such as total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty are responsible for a massive blood loss, often requiring the recourse to homologous blood transfusions. However, in addition to potential risks, homologous blood is an expensive and limited resource, particularly problematic on an aging population. Thus, in order to reduce the need for homologous transfusions several alternative strategies have been developed. The use of devices that allow the postoperative recovery of blood from the surgical site and their reinfusion after filtration is the basis of one of those approaches. In the present study, the strategies available to reduce homologous blood transfusions are reviewed, giving special emphasis to the postoperative recovery of blood from the surgical site with specific devices.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-03-22
How to Cite
Laranjeira, H., Fernandes, N., Ferreira, R., & Borges, L. (2016). Postoperative recovery of blood as an alternative to homologous transfusion in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Journal of the Portuguese Society of Anesthesiology, 21(5), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.25751/rspa.8868
Issue
Section
Narrative Reviews
License
Articles are freely available to be read, downloaded and shared from the time of publication.
The RSPA reserves the right to commercialize the article as an integral part of the journal (in the preparation of reprints, for example). The author should accompany the submission letter with a declaration of copyright transfer for commercial purposes.
Articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC).
After publication in RSPA, authors are allowed to make their articles available in repositories of their home institutions, as long as they always mention where they were published.