Tax litigation and the complexity of autonomous taxation of companies in Portugal
Keywords:Autonomous taxation, litigation, tax complexity, corporate taxation, chartered accountants
This study focuses on the autonomous taxation of companies in Portugal (hereinafter AT), which is levied on certain corporate charges under the Corporate Income Tax Code (abbreviated as CITC). The AT has been the subject of constant litigation between the Tax Administration (hereinafter TA) and the companies, which reveals its complexity, and which justifies the relevance of this research. Through a study on the perception of chartered accountants (hereafter referred to as CA), to which a questionnaire survey was applied, and using a sample of 945 respondents, it was concluded that the CA respondents mostly consider that there is an excessive diversity of AT rates, as well as acknowledge that the AT rules require such an excessive preparation of accounting and tax information. The analysis also confirmed that as the experience of the CA respondents increases, so does their perception of legal disputes between taxpayers and the TA. Similarly, the results showed that as the number of companies for which the CA are responsible increases, the greater is their perception of the degree of difficulty in interpreting the AT rules.
ADEKOYA, ADELEKE; OBOH, COLLINS; e OYEWUMI, OBAFEMI, Accountants perception of the factors influencing auditors’ ethical behaviour in Nigeria, Heliyon, 6(6), e04271, 2020;
BARRIOS, SALVADOR; D’ANDRIA, DIEGO; e GESUALDO, MARIA, Reducing tax compliance costs through corporate tax base harmonization in the European Union, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 41, 100355, 2020;
BORREGO, ANA; e CARREIRA, FRANCISCO, The Perception of Portuguese Accountants on the Impact of the Implementation of E-Accounting With SAFT-PT, Handbook of Research on Accounting and Financial Studies, (L. Farinha, A. Baltazar Cruz and J. Renato Sebastião eds., Business Science Reference), 63–81, 2020;
BORREGO, ANA, Diploma da Fiscalidade Verde – Finalmente uma green tax reform integrada em Portugal?, Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 10(3), 51–68, 2016;
BUDAK, TAMER; JAMES, SIMON; e SAWYER, ADRIAN, The Complexity of Tax Simplification: Experiences From Around the World. James S., Sawyer A., Budak T. (eds): The Complexity of Tax Simplification, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016;
BUTT, DANIEL, The Capacity of Courts to Handle Complexity, Oxford, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2009;
CASALTA NABAIS, JOSÉ, Introdução ao Direito Fiscal das Empresas, 2a Edição, Coimbra, Almedina, 2015;
CAUPERS, JOÃO; ALMEIDA, MARTA TAVARES DE; e GUIBENTIF, PIERRE, Feitura das Leis: Portugal e a Europa, Lisboa, Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, 2014;
DEMIN, ALEXANDER, Certainty and Uncertainty in Tax Law: Do Opposites Attract?, Laws, 2020, 9(4), 1-30, 2020;
DINIS, ANA e MARTINS, ANTÓNIO, Country Note: Portuguese Chartered Accountants’ Perceptions of SME Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxing Expenses, 49, Intertax, Issue 3, pp. 292-300, 2021;
DINIS, ANA; MARTINS, ANTÓNIO; e LOPES, CIDÁLIA, A special feature of corporate income taxation in Portugal: the autonomous taxation of expenses, International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 59 Issue:4, pp.489-503, 2017;
DINIS, ANA; MARTINS, ANTÓNIO; e LOPES, CIDÁLIA, The Autonomous Taxation of Corporate Expenses in Portugal. Empirical evidence of the Portuguese chartered accountants’ perceptions of corporate taxation, Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 2019;
DUFF, ANGUS; HANCOCK, PHIL; e MARRIOTT, NEIL, The role and impact of professional accountancy associations on accounting education research: An international study, British Accounting Review, 52(5), 100829, 2020;
FISHER, ELIZABETH, The Capacity of Courts to Handle Complex Cases: Lessons from Technological Risk Regulation, Oxford, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2009;
FREEDMAN, JUDITH, Lord Hoffmann, tax law and principles, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Vol. Paper No 14/2015, 2015;
FREEDMAN, JUDITH, Managing tax complexity: the institutional framework for tax policy – making and oversight, Working Papers 1508, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation, 2015;
GAMBO, EL-MAUDE; MAS’UD, ABDULASALAM; NASIDI, MUSTAPHA e OYEWOLE, OGINNI, Tax complexity and tax compliance in African self-assessment environment, International Journal of Management Research & Review, 4(5), 575–583, 2014;
HASSELDINE, JOHN e MORRIS, GREGORY, Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: A comment and reflection, Accounting Forum, 37(1), 1-14, 2013;
ISA, KHADIJAH, Tax complexities in the Malaysian corporate tax system: minimise to maximise, International Journal of Law and Management, 56(1), 50-65, 2013;
JAMES, SIMON e ALLEY, CLINTON, Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration, Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, Vol. 2, 2, pp. 27-42, 2002;
KWAKYE, TEDDY; WELBECK, EMERALD; OWUSU, GODFRED; e ANOKYE, FRED, Determinants of intention to engage in Sustainability Accounting & Reporting (SAR): the perspective of professional accountants, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 2018;
MAKDISSI, RIAD; NEHME, ANITA; e KHAWAJA, MIRA, The Effect of the Chartered Accountant’s Work on the Sustainability of the Lebanese Companies, Open Journal of Accounting, 09(02), 15–29, 2020;
RAMOS, DIOGO e MATOS, PEDRO, Portugal, Law Business Research, Tax Disputes and Litigation Review, Seventh Ed., pp. 275–286, 2019;
SALDANHA SANCHES, JOSÉ LUÍS, Manual de Direito Fiscal, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 2007;
SANTOS, ANTÓNIO CARLOS DOS e MARTINS, ANTÓNIO, Relatório do Grupo para o Estudo da Política Fiscal: Competitividade, Eficiência e Justiça do Sistema Fiscal, Secretaria de Estado dos Assuntos Fiscais, Lisboa, Ministério das Finanças, 2009;
SLEMROD, JOEL, Tax Compliance and Enforcement, Journal of Economic Literature, 57 (4): 904-54, 2019;
THURONYI, VICTOR e ESPEJO, ISABEL, How Can an Excessive Volume of Tax Disputes Be Dealt With?, Legal Department of the International Monetary Fund, 2013.
TRAN-NAM, BINH e EVANS, CHRIS, Towards the Development of a Tax System Complexity Index, Fiscal Studies, 35(3), 341–370, 2014;
TRAN-NAM, BINH e WALPOLE, MICHAEL, Tax disputes, litigation costs and access to tax justice, EJournal of Tax Research, 14(2), 319–336, 2016;
TRAN-NAM, BINH; EVANS, CHRIS; KREVER, RICHARD e LIGNIER, PHILIP ANDRE, Managing Tax Complexity: The State of Play after Henry, Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 35(4), 347-358, 2016;
TRAN-NAM, BINH; LIGNIER, PHILIP ANDRE; e EVANS, CHRIS, The impact of recent tax changes on tax complexity and compliance costs: A tax practitioners’ perspective, Australian Tax Forum, 31(3), 455-479, 2016;
ZWICK, ERIC, The Costs of Corporate Tax Complexity, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13 (2), 467-500, 2021.
How to Cite
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.