Legal support of the rights of the child and the gestational courier in the context of the fourth generation of human rights in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-24

Keywords:

Тhe fourth generation of human rights, humanization of legislation, gestational courier, surrogacy, assisted reproductive technologies

Abstract

The permissiveness of Ukrainian legislation toward surrogate motherhood makes Ukraine one of the world’s centers for surrogacy. The paper discusses the solution to the issue of ensuring the implementation of human reproductive rights in the international and national legislation of Ukraine. Attention is drawn to the need to consider the norms of morality, ethics, and religion. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the issue of legal support for the implementation of reproductive human rights by considering the theoretical and applied aspects of the violation of the rights of a surrogate mother, a child born to her in the context of the fourth generation of human rights. The authors analyzed international experience in regulating relations in the field of surrogacy (by the example of the USA, Germany, Italy, Spain, and other countries). The authors researched judicial practice, which began to form in Ukraine. Concern was expressed about the lack of effective government response to cases of violation of the rights of a surrogate mother and child on the territory of the state. The authors formulated a proposal on the need for constant state control over organizations that provide mediation and medical services in the field of surrogacy.

 

 

Author Biographies

Viktoria STRELNYK, Department of Private and Social Law, Sumy National Agrarian University

PhD in Law, associated Professor

Tetiana CHURILOVA, Department of International and European Law and of comparative jurisprudence, Sumy State University

PhD in Law, associated Professor

References

ACHMAND, Claire, Children's Rights in International Commercial Surrogacy: Exploring the challenges from a child rights, public international human rights law perspective. University of Leiden, 2018.

Baby Gammy: Surrogacy row family cleared of abandoning child with Down syndrome in Thailand. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-14/baby-gammy-twin-must-remain-with-family-wa-court-rules/7326196 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

BARANOWSKA, Marta. In Defence of International Law, or Szymon Rundstein’s Idea of the Law of Nations. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2023, № 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2021.49 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

BRAGA, Fátima. Medically Assisted Procreation and the Constitutional Principles of Equality and Non-Discrimination. Revista Jurídica Portucalense. 2023, рр. 57-74. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(ne)2023.ic-04 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

CHENEY, K. Discordant Expectations of Global Intimacy: Desire and Inequality in Commercial Surrogacy. Sociological Research Online, 2022, № 27(1), рр. 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420984169 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

CONDE, A., Santos PEREIRA, C., DIAS COSTA, E. et al. Surrogacy in Portugal: drawing insights from international practices. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 2024, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-09 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

Hague Conference on Private International Law. The parentage / surrogacy project. https://www.hcch.net/en/projects/legislative-projects/parentage-surrogacy (viewed in 12/06/2024)

HONZOVÁ, Ivana et al. Selected legal aspects of surrogacy. Human Affairs, vol. 30 (1), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0004 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

HRES, Nataliia, STRELNYK, Viktoria, Surohatne materynstvo kriz pryzmu “chetvertoho pokolinnia” prav liudyny. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, 2021, vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2021-7/14 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

HUNG Yu Ng E. et al. Regulating Reproductive Technology in Hong Kong. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. New York, 2003. № 7.

International experience of legislative regulation of the issue of use reproductive technologies (including surrogate motherhood) / compiled by: A. Brashovyanu. Kyiv, 2013.

LENYO, Ihor. A Christian view of surrogate motherhood. Bioethical principles. https://sobor.com.ua/news/khristiyanskii-poglyad-na-surogatne-materinstvo (viewed in 12/06/2024)

LUO, Y., MARSHALL, S., CUTHBERT, D. The Human Rights Implications of Not-for-Profit Surrogacy Organizations in Cross-Border Commercial Surrogacy: An Australian Case Study. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2022, vol.7(1),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2021.49 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

Natan Oliveira de SOUZA and CASTILHOS, D.S. 2022. The European Union Court of Justice in defense of Human Rights. Revista Jurídica Portucalense . (Oct. 2022), 307–337. Retrieved from https://revistas.rcaap.pt/juridica/article/view/27320 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

CASTILHOS, D. S. The European Union Court of Justice in Defense of Human Rights. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, Oct. 2022, pp. 307-337 https://revistas.rcaap.pt/juridica/article/view/27320 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

OSTROVSKA, Bogdana. The fate of surrogate mothers and children in the conditions of war in Ukraine. Materials VI International Scientific and Practical Conference Russian-Ukrainian war: law, security, world, Ternopil, Western Ukrainian National University, April 29-30, 2022.

Public Committee to Consider Legislation Regulating Fertility and Childbirth in Israel (Mor-Yosef Committee). Available from: https://www.health.gov.il/publicationsfiles/bap2012.pdf (viewed in 12/06/2024)

TALANOV, Yuriy. Actual problems of surrogate motherhood in the legislation of Ukraine. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. 2012, №1 (56). рр. 360- 368.

ULLAH, Akm Ahsan, NAWAZ, Faraha, Surrogacy-led migration: reflections on the policy dilemmas, Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, 2020, Vol. 23, № 2, pp. 157-171. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PAP-03-2020-0014/full/html (viewed in 12/06/2024)

When Parents and Surrogates Disagree on Abortion, https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/02/surrogacy-contract-melissa-cook/463323/ (viewed in 12/06/2024)

YAREMA, Mariya. Surrogate Motherhood: Ethical Issues. Analecta of the Ukrainian Catholic University. 2019, vol. 2, рр. 343-358.

LEGAL ACTS

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_334%23Text#Text (viewed in 12/06/2024)

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT resolution on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World and the European Union’s policy on the matter: International Legal Document of 17 December 2015. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015IP0470 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. Act on Adoption Placement and Support and on the Prohibition of Surrogacy Placement. Adoption Placement Act as published on 21 June 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 2010). Available from: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_advermig/englisch_advermig.html (viewed in 12/06/2024)

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. Law on the Protection of Embryos (Embryo Protection Act - ESchG) (October 24th, 1990). Available from: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/Gesetze_und_Verordnungen/GuV/E/ESchG_EN_Fassung_Stand_10Dez2014_01.pdf (viewed in 12/06/2024)

FRANCE. Law № 94-653 of July 29, 1994. On Respect for the Human Body. Official journal “Laws and Decrees” No. 0175 of July 30, 1994.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION. Convention on the Rights of the Child: International Legal Document of November 20, 1989. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_021%23Text (viewed in 12/06/2024)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Resolution 37/194. Principles of Medical Ethics of December 18, 1982. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/principles-medical-ethics-relevant-role-health-personnel (viewed in 12/06/2024)

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York, 18 December 1979 Available from: https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/unga/1979/en/13757 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

ILLINOIS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Gestation Surrogacy Act. Public Act 093-0921. HB4962 Enrolled. LRB093 20774 LCB 466675b. Available from: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?Name=093-0921&write=

(viewed in 12/06/2024)

ITALY. Law 19 February 2004, № 40 Regulations on Medically Assisted Procreation published in the Official Gazette No. 45 of February 24, 2004. Available from: https://www.iss.it/documents/20126/6898329/Act+Feb.+19%2C+2004+%2C+No+40.pdf/276cf272-69b1-4a3d-bf92-a4d9d6c54bad?t=1656076081602 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

POLAND. Act of 16 October 2019. Penal Code and the Act - Code of Civil Procedure. Available from: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20190002128/O/D20192128.pdf (viewed in 12/06/2024)

PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC. Law № 90/2021. Republic Diary № 242/2021, Series 1 of 2021-12-16. Available from: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/lei/90-2021-175983728 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

SPAIN. Law № 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures. Bulletin Oficial del Estado. 24 Nov 1988. No. 282. P. 33373–33378. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11659178/ (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UKRAINE. Civil Code of Ukraine № 435-IV of January 16, 2003. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UKRAINE. Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine Law № 1618-IV of 18 March 2004. Legislation of Ukraine. 2023 Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UKRAINE. Family Code of Ukraine: Law № 2947-III January 10, 2002. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UKRAINE. Fundamentals of L legislation of Ukraine on Healthcare: Law of Ukraine № 2801-XII of November 19, 1992// Database “Legislation of Ukraine”. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2801-12%23Text#Text (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UKRAINE. On assisted reproductive technologies: Draft Law № 6475 of 28 Deсember 2021. Available from: https://itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/38695 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UNITED KINGDOM. Adoption Act 22nd July 1976: Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1976/36/contents (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UNITED KINGDOM. Human Fertilization and Embryology Act. 13 November 2008. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/part/1 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Adopted by General Assembly Resolution 34/180 of 18 December 1979.

UNITED NATIONS. Declaration on the Use of Scientific and Technological Progress in the Interests of Peace and for the Benefit of Humanity, Adopted by General Assembly Resolution 3384 (XXX) of November 10, 1975.

Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights of November 11, 1997. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/universal-declaration-human-genome-and-human-rights (viewed in 12/06/2024)

CASE LAW

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. D. and Others v. Belgium, no. 29176/13, decision of 8 July 2014 Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-155182%22]} (viewed in 12/06/2024)

Decision of the Uman City District Court of Cherkasy Region of June 12, 2015 in case No. 705/5327/14-ts / Unified State Register of Court Decisions Available from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/45291321 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

Decision of the Zarichny District Court of the city of Sumy of December 28, 2019 in case No. 591/7976/19 / Unified State Register of Court Decisions Available from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86701591 (viewed in 12/06/2024)

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Labassee v. France, Application no 65941/11, 26 June 2014. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-9780%22]} (viewed in 12/06/2024)

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Menesson v. France, Application no 65192/11, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 26 June 2014. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-9781%22]} (viewed in 12/06/2024)

Downloads

Published

2024-06-22

How to Cite

STRELNYK, V. ., HRES, N. ., & CHURILOVA, T. (2024). Legal support of the rights of the child and the gestational courier in the context of the fourth generation of human rights in Ukraine. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 513–539. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-24

Issue

Section

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH