UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law: Critiques and Possible Effects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-27

Keywords:

Factoring, UNIDROIT, Factoring Model Law, Model Law on Secured Transactions, Receivable.

Abstract

Factoring fulfills an important function globally in financing and accessing credit for businesses, companies and entrepreneurs of all sizes, especially small and medium-sized businesses. The UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law was prepared within a three-year period as a result of the work initiated by UNIDROIT upon the recommendation of the World Bank due to reasons such as the inadequacy of the existing international legislation for countries to create a functional factoring legislation and the need to create global rules and legislation specific to factoring. The UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law for which the Guide to Enactment has not yet been prepared, contains some challenging rules. During the preparation of the UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law, other relevant legal regulations were also used and compliance with them was observed. In this study, the UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law, which is a very new legislation, has been criticized under basic section headings and its weaknesses and strengths have been examined. While doing this, an answer is sought to the question of whether the UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law could meet the expectations. Additionally, its possible effects are discussed. It has been concluded that the UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law contains provisions that may cause problems and confusion in practice especially under the headings of the scope of receivables subject to transfer, notification and registration system, priority rights, but in general it should be welcomed as an exemplary law. It is too early to answer the question of whether the UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law will be successful internationally, that is, to what extent it will be adopted by countries. The Guide to Enactment to be prepared in this process will also be effective.

References

Akseli Orkun, Turkish Law and UNCITRAL's Work on the Assignment of Receivables with a Special Reference to the Assignment of Future Receivables' (2007) 1(1) Law and Financial Markets Review 45 ff.

Arruñada Benito, ‘Registries’ (2014) 1(2) Man and the Economy 209 ff.

Bazinas, Spyridon V 'The desirability and feasibility of another uniform law on factoring' July/August (2020) Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 467 ff.

Brydie, Watson William, 'The desirability and feasibility of another uniform law on factoring' August/September (2023) Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 556 ff.

Campa Alejandro Alvarez de la, ‘IFC's Secured Transactions and Collateral Registries Program “Results Framework: Methods and Findings” https://www.ebrd.com/downloads/legal/secured/campa2m.pdf. accessed 8 December 2024.

EBRD, ‘New Finance Support’ https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/sectors/legal-reform/access-to-finance.html accessed 04 January 2023.

Fangyao Bai, 'On the Rules for Determining Pure Future Claims in Factoring Contracts' (2023) 4(3) Modern Law Research 7 ff.

FCI, Industry Statistics https://fci.nl/en/industry-statistics?language-content-entity=en accessed 31 October 2023.

Glinavos John, ‘An introduction to international factoring & projects finance.’ (2002) 11 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/854/ accessed 16 December 2023.

Klapper Leora, 'The role of factoring for financing small and medium enterprises.' (2006) 30(11) Journal of Banking & Finance 3112.

Love Inessa, Martínez Peria Soledad Maria and Sandeep Singh, ‘Collateral Registries for Movable Assets Does Their Introduction Spur Firms’ Access to Bank Finance?’ (2013) Policies Research working Paper accessed 8 December2024https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/731881468314344960/pdf/WPS6477.pdf.

MacMahon Paul . “Rethinking Assignability.” (2020) 79(2) The Cambridge Law Journal 314.

Milenkovic-Kerkovic Tamara and Dencic-Mihajlov Ksenija, ‘Factoring in the Changing Environment: Legal and Financial Aspects.’ (2012) 44 Procedia Social and Behavioral Science 433.

Mohammadzadeh Nasibeh, Nogoorani Sadegh Dorry, and Muñoz-Tapia José Luis, ‘Invoice factoring registration based on a public blockchain.’ (2021) IEEE access 924221 ff.

Rivest Ronald L., Shamir Adi and Adleman Leonardo, ‘A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems.’ (1978) 21(2) Communications of the ACM 120 ff.

Shohib Muslim, ‘Legal Protection for Parties in Transferring Receivables from Factoring Transactions (Factoring).’ (2022) 37(1) Yuridika 156.

Spasic Ivanka, Milorad Bejatovic and Marijana Dukić-Mijatović , 'Factoring - Instrument Of Financing In Business Practice – Some Important Legal Aspects.' (2012) 25 Economic-Research Ekonomska Istraživanja 157.

The Business Contract Terms (Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018, No. 1254.

UNIDROIT, ‘Model Law on Factoring Consultation -Comments Summary Table’ (November 2022) https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Study-LVIII-A-W.G.6-Doc.-4-Summary-table-of-comments-on-draft-MLF.pdf accessed 26 November 2023.

UNIDROIT, ‘Item No. 4 on the agenda: Adoption of Draft UNIDROIT Instruments’ (April 2023)https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CD-102-5-Model-Law-on-Factoring.pdf accessed 26 November 2023.

UNIDROIT, ‘Model Law on Factoring Consultation Submissions’ (November 2022), 90 https://www.unidroit.org/wp content/uploads/2023/02/Study-LVIII-AW.G.6-Doc.-5-rev.-MLF-online-consultation submissions.pdf, accessed 26 November 2023.

UNIDROIT, ‘Summary Report of the Forth Session’ (February 2022), 21 paragraph 102 https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Study LVIII-AW.G.4-Doc.-6-Report.pdf accessed 28 November 2023.

UNIDROIT, ‘Draft Model Law on Factoring’ (November 2022) https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Study-LVIII-AW.G.6-Doc.-3-Draft-Model-Law-on-Factoring.pdf , accessed 28 November 2023.

UNIDROIT, ‘Model Law on Factoring’ (2023) https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/UNIDROIT-Model-Law-on-Factoring-En-PDF-version.pdf , accessed 28 November 2023.

UNIDROIT, ‘Summary Report of the Sixth Session’ (March 2023), 6 paragraph 10 https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Study-LVIII-AW.G.6-Doc.-7-Report.pdf , accessed 29 November 2023.

UNIDROIT, ‘Issues Paper’ (November 2021) 7-9 paragraph 20, 21, 22 https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Study-LVIII-AW.G.4-Doc.-2-Issues-paper.pdf accessed 10 December 2023.

UNIDROIT, https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/factoring/model-law-on-factoring/model-law-on-factoring-implementation/ accessed 04 January 2023.

UNIDROIT, Summary Report of the First Session (August 2020) 20-23 paragraph 147-163 https://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/2020/study58a/wg01/s-58a-wg-01-04-rev01-e.pdf accessed 26 December 2023.

World Trade Board, ‘Financial Inclusion in Trade Roadmap’ https://worldtradesymposium.com/sites/wts/files/file/2023-03/financial-inclusion-in-trade-roadmap-2023.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

KAYA, barış. (2024). UNIDROIT Factoring Model Law: Critiques and Possible Effects. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 584–601. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-27

Issue

Section

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH