Who speaks on our behalf?
National identity and constitutional adjudication in the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(38)2025.jur-02Keywords:
National identity, Data retention, National security, Portuguese Constitutional Court, Court of Justice of the European UnionAbstract
With the growing influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") in sectors traditionally seen as part of the core of Member States’ sovereignty, national constitutional courts have increasingly invoked national identity to justify deviations from the primacy of EU law. This tension is particularly pronounced in matters tied to the fundamental competencies of the state which are intrinsic to national identity and the constitutional legitimacy of member states.
This paper explores how national identity is deployed by national constitutional courts to resist the primacy of EU law. We take the Portuguese experience as our starting point, examining the dissenting opinion of Justice Joana Fernandes Costa in the latest ruling of the Portuguese Constitutional Court on data retention, in which she raises concerns over the extent to which the CJEU case-law on the matter that allows EU law to override national security core concerns, such as ensuring security and peace.
The main argument raised is that, while national identity claims could serve as a basis for national courts to resist the primacy of EU law, they must also take into consideration the agreement the peoples of Europe reached when joining the EU.
References
Jurisprudence
BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT. Urteil des Zweiten Senats ( 2 BvE 2/08) [online]. Karlsruhe : [s. n.], 2009. Available from: <http://www.bverfg.de/e/es20090630_2bve000208en.html>.
COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Judgment of the Court, Case C-204/21 (Commission v. Poland) [online]. Luxembourg: [s. n.], 2023. Available from: <https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=274364&pageIndex=0&doclang=PT&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10341691>.
COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Judgment of the Court, Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15 (Tele2 Sverige) [online]. Luxembourg: [s. n.], 2016. Available from: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62015CJ0203>.
COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Judgment of the Court, Cases C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18 (La Quadrature du Net) [online]. Luxembourg: [s. n.], 2020. Available from: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0511>.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Big Brother Watch and Others v. United Kingdom (Proc. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) [online]. Strasbourg: [s. n.], 2021. Available from: <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-210077>.
TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL DE PORTUGAL. Acórdão n.o 800/2023 [online]. Lisbon : [s. n.], 2023. Available from: <https://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt/tc/acordaos/20230800.html>.
TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL DE PORTUGAL. Declaração de voto de Joana Fernandes Costa ao Acórdão n.o 800/2023 [online]. Lisbon : [s. n.], 2023. Available from: <https://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt/tc/acordaos/20230800.html>.
TRYBUNAŁ KONSTYTUCYJNY. Wyrok w imieniu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (K 3/21) [online]. Warsaw : [s. n.], 2021. Available from: <https://trybunal.gov.pl/postepowanie-i-orzeczenia/wyroki/art/11662-ocena-zgodnosci-z-konstytucja-rp-wybranych-przepisow-traktatu-o-unii-europejskiej>.
Bibliography
ACKERMAN, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1991. ISBN 0674948400.
ACKERMAN, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998. ISBN 0674948475.
AGUIRRESAROBE, Asier H. Is national identity in crisis? An assessment of national imaginations in the early 2020s. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2022, Vol. 22, n° 1, p. 14‑27.
ANDERSON, Benedict. Imagined Communities: The Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Revised Ed. London: Verso, 2006. ISBN 9781844670864.
BASSOK, Or. Interpretative theories as roadmaps to constitutional identity: The case of the United States. Global Constitutionalism. 2015, Vol. 4, n° 3, p. 289‑327.
BENNER, Erica. Nationalism: Intellectual Origins. In: BREUILLY, John, The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 36‑55.
BÖCKENFÖRDE, Ernst-Wolfgang. Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. ISBN 9780198714965.
CALHOUN, Craig. Nations Matter: Culture, History, and the Cosmopolitan Dream. New York: Routledge, 2017. ISBN 0203960890.
COUTINHO, Francisco Pereira. Data Retention in Portugal : Big Brother is ( No Longer ) Watching [online]. 2023. Available from: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=4216870>.
DORMAL, Michel. Political Representation and Imagined Community: The Case of Luxembourg. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2012, Vol. 12, n° 3, p. 498‑516.
DURKHEIM, Émile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 9780199540129.
GRAMSCI, Antonio. The Modern Prince & Other Writings. Paris: Foreign Languages Press, 2021. ISBN 9782491182502.
HUTCHINSON, John. Myth Against Myth: The Nation as Ethnic Overlay. Nations and Nationalism. 2004, Vol. 10, n° 1‑2, p. 109‑123.
HUTCHINSON, John. Nations as Zones of Conflict. London: Sage Publications, 2005. ISBN 0761957278.
JAYET, Cyril. Is Nation ‘One of the Most Puzzling and Tendentious Items in the Political Lexicon’?. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2019, Vol. 19, n° 2, p. 152‑169.
KERR, William. Nations as Zones of Conflict, Nations as Zones of Selection: A Darwinian Social Evolutionary Engagement with John Hutchinson’s ‘Culture Wars’. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2019, Vol. 19, n° 2, p. 170‑186.
LOUGHLIN, Martin. The Concept of Constituent Power. European Journal of Political Theory. 2014, Vol. 13, n° 2, p. 218‑237.
LOUGHLIN, Martin and WALKER, Neil. Introduction. In: LOUGHLIN, Martin and WALKER, Neil, The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constitutional Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 1‑8.
MILLER, David. Citizenship and National Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000. ISBN 0745623948.
MILLER, David. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. ISBN 0198280475.
NOOTENS, Geneviève. Constituent power and people-as-the-governed: About the ‘invisible’ people of political and legal theory. Global Constitutionalism. 2015, Vol. 4, n° 2, p. 137‑156.
O’CONNELL, Judith. Politics and Processes of Nation-Building During and After Empire: A Review of the Irish Case through an Examination of School Textbooks. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2018, Vol. 18, n° 2, p. 127‑146.
PAREKH, Bhikhu. The concept of national identity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 1995, Vol. 21, n° 2, p. 255‑268.
PITKIN, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972. ISBN 9780520021563.
RASH, Felicity. Images of the Self and the Other in the Nationalist Writing of Houston Stewart Chamberlain. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 2012, Vol. 12, n° 2, p. 344‑362.
ROSENFELD, Michel. The identity of the constitutional subject: Selfhood, citizenship, culture, and community [online]. London: Routledge, 2009. ISBN 0203868986.
SCHMITT, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. ISBN 9780226738895.
SIEYÈS, Emmanuel Joseph. Political Writings Including the Debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 2003. ISBN 9780872204317.
SMITH, Anthony D. National Identity. London: Penguin Books, 1991. ISBN 0140125655.
SMITH, Anthony D. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Vol. 7. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1986. ISBN 9780631161691.
TÖNNIES, Ferdinand. Community and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. ISBN 0521561191.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francisco ARGA E LIMA, Francisco Pereira Coutinho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
