The justification of the loser-pays principle in civil litigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(38)2025.ic-24Keywords:
litigation costs; loser-pays principle; justification; theory of initiation of unnecessary costs; right to access to justice; economy of proceedingsAbstract
In civil procedure, there are two main cost allocation rules: the English Rule and the American Rule. The English Rule, also known as the loser-pays principle, stipulates that the losing party must pay all legal expenses. The American Rule states that each party must pay their own attorney fees, regardless of the outcome of the proceedings. This paper critically reviews the primary theories supporting the loser-pays principle in civil litigation, including the theories of strict liability, compensation, procedural risk and policy, and the theory of the initiation of unnecessary costs. According to the teleological approach, which focuses on how litigation costs restrict the right to access to justice, the theory of initiation of unnecessary costs provides the most appropriate foundation for the loser-pays principle. This theory stems from the principle of economy of proceedings, which specifies effective legal protection by identifying the losing party as the party that caused unnecessary litigation costs, which are then logically imposed on that party.
References
ADELMANN-PENTEK, Carola. Das Prozesskostenrecht der ZPO im Vergleich mit den entsprechenden Regelungen in Österreich, in der Schweiz, in Frankreich, Italien, Spanien, England, Schweden und in der ehemaligen DDR. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre, 2001. ISBN 3896497391.
ANDREWS, Neil. The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration and Mediation in England. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer, 2018. ISBN 9783319748320.
ANTUNES, Henrique S. Portugal. In: HODGES, Christopher, VOGENAUER, Stefan, TULIBACKA, Magdalena. The Costs and Funding of Civil Litigation: A Comparative Perspective. 1st ed. London: Hart Publishing, 2010, p. 467-482. ISBN 9781849461023.
BAUMBACH, Adolf, et. al. Zivilprozessordnung: mit Fam FG, GVG und anderen Nebengesetzen. 74th ed. München: Beck. Beck’sche Kurz-Kommentare, 2016. ISBN 3406676006.
BECKER-EBERHARD, Ekkehard. Grundlagen der Kostenerstattung bei der Verfolgung zivilrechtlicher Ansprüche: zugleich ein Beitrag zum Verhältnis zwischen materiell-rechtlichem und prozessualem Kostenerstattungsanspruch. Bielefeld: Gieseking, 1985. ISBN 3769402057.
BOKELMANN, Erika. „Rechtswegsperre“ durch Prozeßrecht. Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 1973, vol. 7, pp.164-171. ISSN 0514-6496.
BREYER, Michael. Kostenorientierte Steuerung des Zivilprozesses. Das deutsche, englische und amerikanische Prozesskostensystem im Vergleich. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006. ISBN 3161489845.
BYDLINSKI, Michael. Kostenersatz im Zivilprozess: Grundfragen des Kostenrechts und praktische Anwendung. Wien: Manz Verlag, 1992. ISBN 978-3-214-05927-9.
CAMERON, Camille. The Price of Access to the Civil Courts in Australia – Old Problems, New Solutions: A Commercial Litigation Funding Case Study. In: REIMANN, Mathias. Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht, New York: Springer, 2012, pp. 59-68. ISBN 978-94-007-2262-0.
CHVOSTA, PETER. Prozesskostenrecht. Wien: Manz Verlag, 2001. ISBN 978-3-214-07967-3.
DAVIS, W. Kent. The International View of Attorney Fees in Civil Suits: Why Is the United States the Odd Man Out in How It Pays Its Lawyers. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1999, vol. 16, pp. 361-436. ISSN 0743-6963.
DE BARROS, Alexandre Alcino, DE MIRANDA, Sílvia Julio Bueno. Major Shifting: The Brazilian Way. In: REIMANN, Mathias. Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht, New York: Springer, 2012, pp. 89-98. ISBN 978-94-007-2262-0.
DE LUCA, Alessandra. Italy: A Tale of Successful Resistance? In: REIMANN, Mathias. Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht, New York: Springer, 2012, pp. 185-194. ISBN 978-94-007-2262-0.
DE TEMMERMAN, Bart. Rechtsvergelijkende variaties op een heikel thema: de verhaalbaarheid van kosten van verdediging. In: EVERS, Freddy, LEFRANC, Pierre. De verhaalbaarheid van de kosten van verdediging: en wat met de toegang tot de rechter? Bruges: Die Keure, 2005, pp. 21-52, ISBN 9059589572.
DJAJIĆ, Sanja. Unlocking Justice: Access to Court and Litigation Costs Under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Age of Human Rights Journal [online]. June 2025, n. 24 [18.9.2025]. ISSN 2340-9592. Available from https://revistaselectronicas.ujaen.es/index.php/TAHRJ/article/view/9282/9691
DOUKA, Anastasia. Economic parameters of the civil trial in Greek and international civil procedural order (in Greek). Athens – Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2021. ISBN 978-960-648-407-0.
DOUKA, Anastasia. Offsetting litigation costs based on the proportional application of Article 179 of the Greek Civil Procedure Code (in Greek). Epitheorisi Politikis Dikonomias, October 2024, nº 5, pp. 561-571. ISSN 1791-3705.
EHRIG, Hans-Georg. Kostenerstattung – Erfolgsprämie oder Prozeßtrafe? Zeitschrift für die Rechtspolitik, 1971, vol. 11, pp. 252-253. ISSN 0514-6496.
FASCHING, Hans Walter. Lehrbuch des österreichischen Zivilprozessrechts: Lehr- und Handbuch für Studium und Praxis. 2nd ed. Wien: Manz Verlag, 1990. ISBN 3214046977.
FOLKARD, Joshua. Extending Jackson's Patchwork Quilt: A Disintegrated Approach to the Costs-Shifting Rule. Civil Justice Quarterly, April 2015, vol. 34, nº 2, pp. 172-190. ISSN 0261-9261.
FUCIK, Robert. In: RECHBERGER, Walter. Kommentar zur ZPO. 3rd ed. Wien: Springer, 2006, § 41. ISBN 3211838880.
GLENN, Patrick. The Irrelevance of Costs Rules to Litigation Rates: The Experience of Quebec and Common Law Canada. In: REIMANN, Mathias. Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht, New York: Springer, 2012, pp. 99-107. ISBN 978-94-007-2262-0.
GOLDSCHMIDT, James. Der Prozess als Rechtslage: eine Kritik des prozessualen Denkens. Berlin: Springer, 1925.
GULDENER, Max. Schweizerisches Zivilprozessrecht. 3rd ed. Zürich: Schulthess, 1979. ISBN 3725519641.
HAARDT, W.L. De veroordeling in de kosten van het burgerlijk geding. 's-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff, 1945.
HARTOGH, A.F.K. In: Handeling der Nederlandsche Juristen-Vereeniging. ’s-Gravenhage, 1875.
HIGGINS, Andrew. The Costs of Civil Justice and Who Pays? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, July 2017, vol. 37, nº 3, pp. 687-713. ISSN 01436503.
JACKSON, Rupert. Fixed Costs – The Time Has Come [online]. IPA Annual Lecture, 28 January 2016 [17.09.2025]. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/fixedcostslecture-1.pdf
KLEIN, Franz. Zeit-und Geistesströmungen im Prozesse.1948.
KOHLER, Josef. Der Prozess als Rechtsverhältnis: Prolegomena zu einem System des Zivilprozesses. Mannheim: J. Bensheimer, 1888.
MUTHORST, Olaf. In: STEIN, Friedrich, JONAS, Martin. Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung. 23rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016. ISBN 978-3-16-152897-2.
PAWLOWSKI, Hans-Martin. Zur Funktion der Prozeßkosten. Juristenzeitung, April 1975, vol. 30, nº 7, pp. 197-202. ISSN 00226882.
PFENNIGSTORF, Werner. The European Experience with Attorney Fee Shifting. Law and Contemporary Problems, Winter 1984, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 37-124. ISSN 0023-9186.
RECHBERGER, Walter, SIMOTTA, Daphne. Grundriss des österreichen Zivilprozessrechts: Erkenntnisverfahren. 8th ed. Wien: Manz Verlag, 2010. ISBN 3214157493.
REIMANN, Mathias: Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Synthesis. In: REIMANN, Mathias. Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht, New York: Springer, 2012, pp. 3-56. ISBN 978-94-007-2262-0.
ROOT, David A. Attorney Fee-Shifting in America: Comparing, Contrasting, and Combining the American Rule and English Rule. Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, January 2005, vol.15, no. 3, pp. 583-617. ISSN 1061-4982.
ROSENBERG, Leo, SCHWAB, Karl Heinz, GOTTWALD, Peter. Zivilprozessrecht. 18th ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2018. ISBN 3406710859.
ROWE, Thomas D. The Legal Theory of Attorney Fee Shifting: A Critical Overview. Duke Law Journal, September 1982, vol. 1982, nº 4, pp. 651-680. ISSN 00127086.
SCHULTZKY, Hendrik. Die Kosten der Berufung und Revision im Zivilprozess: de lege lata und de lege ferenda. Köln [u.a.]: Heymann, 2003. ISBN 3452255468.
SCHULZ, Andreas. In: LÜKE, Gerhard. Münchener Kommentar zur Zivilprozeßordnung: mit Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen §§ 1-354. 6th ed. München: Beck, 2020. ISBN 9783406745218.
SMID, Stefan, HARTMANN, Sabine. In: WIECZOREK, Bernhard, SCHÜTZE, Rolf. Zivilprozessordnung und Nebengesetze: Großkommentar. 4th ed. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015. ISBN 9783110410860.
VRENDENBARG, C.J.S. Proceskostenveroordeling en toegang tot de rechter in IE-zaken: regelingen over proceskosten getoetst aan het EU-recht. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN 9789013148084.
WASSERMANN, Rudolf. Der soziale Zivilprozess: zur Theorie und Praxis des Zivilprozesses im sozialen Rechtsstaat. Orig.-Ausg. Neuwied, Darmstadt: Luchterhand, 1978. ISBN 3472160020.
ZUCKERMAN, Adrian. Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of Practice. 3rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. ISBN 9781847039606.
ZUCKERMAN, Adrian. The Jackson Final Report on Costs — Plastering the Cracks to Shore Up a Dysfunctional System. Civil Justice Quarterly, 2010, vol. 29, nº 3, pp. 263-283. ISSN 0261-9261.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anastasia DOUKA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
