Ostomizd quality of life

psychological profile

Authors

  • Olivério Ribeiro Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Saúde de Viseu, CI&DETS
  • Madalena Cunha Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Saúde de Viseu, CI&DETS. Universidade do Minho, CIEC, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-9220
  • António Dias Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Saúde de Viseu, CI&DETS https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-2174
  • Carlos Albuquerque Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Saúde de Viseu, CI&DETS. Universidade do Minho, CIEC, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-0636
  • Estudantes 19º CLE, ESSV, IPV Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Saúde de Viseu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48492/servir023.24010

Keywords:

Ostomy, Quality of life, Self-concept and, Self-esteem

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An ostomy is a surgically created opening to connect an internal organ to the surface of the body, and may be temporary or definitive. With the construction of the stoma several changes to the social, family and mainly psychological level arise, influencing the quality of life of the ostomized. As such, the realization of a study addressing the problem was proved relevant.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Quality of life (Qol) of people with Ostomy;

Determine the influence of psychological variables (self-concept and self-esteem) on Qol.

METHODS

Data collection was carried out in a sample consisting of 104 definitely ostomized individuals, 58 men and 46 women, aged between 24 and 91 years old, being the average 64 years.

RESULTS

This is a quantitative, descriptive-analytical, with cross section study, whose goals were Data collection was carried out in a sample consisting of 104 ostomized individuals, 55,77% men and 44,23% women, aged between 24 and 91 years old, being the average age 64 years.

In what concerns the psychological variables, it was found that the better the self-concept (r=0,667; p=0,000) and self-esteem (r=0,656; p=0,000) the best is QoL.

We also infer that the psychological variables (self-concept and self-esteem) are predictive of Qol, respectively explaining 44.60% and 43.10% of its variability.

CONCLUSION

Given the results we infer that it is necessary to be attentive to the needs of the ostomized person, as well as to their psychological profile in order to plan health interventions that minimize the effect of the ostomy presence in their carrier’s Qol.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bróis, P. & Martins A. (2007, Fevereiro). O papel do enfermeiro na promoção da qualidade de vida da pessoa colostomizada. Nursing. 218 (16-20).

Cainé, J. (2008, Janeiro). Viver com uma ostomia: o processo de integração da nova condição de saúde. Enfermagem Oncológica. 41, (8-10).

Cunha-Nunes, M.M.J. (2004). Qualidade de Vida e Diabetes: Variáveis Psicossociais. Tesis Doctoral, apresentada à Universidad de Extremadura em 2004.

Lyon, C. & Smith A. (2001). Abdominal Stomas And Their Skin Disorders. United Kingdom: Martin Dunitz Ltd.

Moser, A., Guerber, C., Faszank, F., Leonardi, A., Cardoso, M. (2002). Desenvolvimento de habilidades sociais em idosos residentes em um asilo na Cidade da Lapa - Pr. In 4º Congresso Nacional de Psicologia da Saúde. “A saúde numa perspetiva de ciclo de vida”. Lisboa 2-5 Outubro (175-182).

Pais-Ribeiro, J.L. (1994). Psicologia da saúde, saúde e doença. In Psicologia da saúde: áreas de intervenção e perspectivas futuras. Braga: Associação de Psicólogos Portugueses, p. 33-55

Vickery, C., Gontkovsky, S. & Caroselli, J. (2005, Agosto). Self-concept and quality of life following aquired brain injury: A pilot investigation. Brain Injury. 9 (19), 657-665.

WHOQOL Group (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science e Medicine, 41 (10), 1403- 1409.

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Ribeiro, O., Cunha, M., Dias, A., Albuquerque, C., & Estudantes 19º CLE, ESSV, IPV. (2016). Ostomizd quality of life: psychological profile. Servir, 59(3), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.48492/servir023.24010