Artificial Intelligence, Programming, and Computational Thinking in Physics and Science Education
A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.45263Keywords:
artificial intelligence, physics teaching, science teaching, computational thinking, systematic reviewAbstract
This study presents a systematic literature review on the integration of Artificial Intelligence, Programming Language, and Computational Thinking in Physics and Science Education. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 protocol, including searches in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, with a time frame between 2015 and 2025. After rigorous application of eligibility and duplication criteria, 17 fully traceable studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. The results indicate recent growth in research, with a predominance of reviews and empirical studies focused on personalised learning, problem solving, computational modelling, and teacher training. Despite the identified pedagogical potential, the studies highlight challenges related to teacher training, technological infrastructure, and ethical issues. It is concluded that the integration of these technologies requires critical pedagogical approaches, aligned with educational objectives and teaching practices.
Downloads
References
Alhusni, H. Z., Ramadani, R., Sunarti, T., Madlazim, & Ahmadi, M. R. D. (2025). Artificial intelligence in physics learning for education for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Law and Bibliometrics Studies, 1(3), 95. https://journal.i-ros.org/index.php/JOLABIS/article/view/95
Aydin-Günbatar, S., Durukan, A., & Günbatar, M. S. (2025). Generative AI as the new frontier in science education: A systematic review of Web of Science articles. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00677-6
Dai, Y., Liu, A., Qin, J., Guo, Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Chai, C. S., & Lin, Z. (2023). Collaborative construction of artificial intelligence curriculum in primary schools. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20503
Garcia, O. A., García, M. D. C. R., & Alonso-Secades, V. (2025). Perceptions, strategies, and challenges of teachers in the integration of artificial intelligence in primary education: A systematic review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 24, 006. https://doi.org/10.28945/5458
Gomez, E. L., & Fitzgerald, M. T. (2017). Robotic telescopes in education. Astronomical Review, 13(1), 28-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/21672857.2017.1303264
Großmann, L., Koberstein-Schwarz, M., Scholl, D., Krüger, D., & Meisert, A. (2025). Establishing common ground in empirical research on science teachers’ lesson planning competence: A scoping review. Studies in Science Education, 61(2), 329-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2415246
Jia, F., Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in science education (2013–2023): Research trends in ten years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), 94-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6
Kaur, A., Bhatia, M., & Stea, G. (2022). A survey of smart classroom literature. Education Sciences, 12(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020086
Kotsis, K. T. (2025). Artificial intelligence for physics education in STEM classrooms: A narrative review within a pedagogy–technology–policy framework. Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education, 6(3), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.37251/sjpe.v6i3.2148
Martins, K. C. O., Batista, S. G., & Jardim, M. I. de A. (2026). Inteligência artificial no ensino de Ciências: Um mapeamento sistemático de produções no contexto brasileiro [Artificial intelligence in science teaching: A systematic mapping of productions in the Brazilian context] [In Portuguese]. Educitec – Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Ensino Tecnológico, 12, e279926. https://sistemascmc.ifam.edu.br/educitec/index.php/educitec/article/view/2799
Meylani, R. (2024). Blueprint for the 21st-century online learning environment in STEM education through a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 8196-8226. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3763
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pimbblet, K. A., & Morrell, L. J. (2025). Can ChatGPT pass a physics degree? Making a case for reformation of assessment of undergraduate degrees. European Journal of Physics, 46(1), 015702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad9874
Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M. (2025). Beyond STEM: A narrative review of STEAM education’s impact on creativity and innovation (2020–2025). Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v4i4.175
Rieser, H. M., Köster, F., & Raulf, A. P. (2023). Tensor networks for quantum machine learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2275), 20230218. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2023.0218
Santaella, L. (2025). A ética como guia para o uso da inteligência artificial generativa [Ethics as a guide for the use of generative artificial intelligence] [In Portuguese]. Educação & Sociedade, 46, e296469. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES.296469
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Sommer, B., & Moncayo, G. (2023). Machine learning and artificial intelligence in building physics education: Series: Building simulation and calculation tools in teaching. Bauphysik, 45(6), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/bapi.202300020
Taufik, M., Zuhdi, M., Ayub, S., Rokhmat, J., & Mustofa, H. A. (2024). AI-driven optimization of Pascal programming instruction for undergraduate physics students at University of Mataram. International Journal of Contextual Science Education, 2(2), 44-47. https://jurnalpasca.unram.ac.id/index.php/ijcse/article/view/640
Ulukok-Yildirim, S., & Sonmez, D. (2025). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence research in the field of science education. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 11(4), 334-352. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.870
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wulff, P. (2024). Physics language and language use in physics—What do we know and how AI might enhance language-related research and instruction. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 023001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad0f9c
Yeadon, W., & Hardy, T. (2024). The impact of AI in physics education: A comprehensive review from GCSE to university levels. Physics Education, 59(2), 025010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad1fa2
Zhang, P., & Tur, G. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K–12 education. European Journal of Education, 59, e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sisyphus — Journal of Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) belongs to Sisyphus - Journal of Education. However, we encourage issued articles to be published elsewhere, provided that Sisyphus authorization is asked for and that authors integrate our original source citation and a link to our website.
Author Self-Archiving Policy
Author(s) are permitted to self-archive the final published version in institutional or thematic repositories, and in their personal or institutional websites.
DORA Signer
The Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa, Sisyphus' Publisher, is a San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment signer.



