Towards sustainable civil justice: Lessons from Ukraine and Austria
Keywords:
Sustainable justice; Civil procedure; Alternative dispute resolution; European civil procedure; Harmonization of civil procedure; Ukrainian-Austrian relations; Strengthening of judicial cooperation.Abstract
The judiciary has always been a crucial part of rule of law states and open societies, guaranteeing the right to protection, if needed, to perform and establish justice in general. Today, we face many challenges that require a more flexible and more resilient judicial mechanism aimed at achieving fair and equal justice for all amid pandemics, armed conflicts, and crises. In this article, we explore the Ukrainian experience in civil justice development, which is worth attention for many reasons. Despite the soviet inheritance’s wide-reaching impact on legal development, 30 years later, novel approaches have been realized in the new Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. Therefore, in the first part of the article, particular attention will be devoted to the dichotomy of the right of protection vs dispute resolution as the main aim of civil justice evolution in a democratic state. In the second part, we will summarize how to ensure equal access to justice amid COVID-19. Comparing the examples of Ukraine and Austria provided a basis for the concluding remarks, which allow us to contribute to furthering civil justice evolution for the next generation.
References
Austria. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://minjust.gov.ua/m/avstriya>.
Außergerichtliche Streitschlichtung für Verbraucher [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/themen/dokumente_und_recht/zivilrecht/1/1/Seite.1010144.html>.
BGBl. I Nr. 29/2003, NR: GP XXII RV 24 AB 47 S. 12., BR: AB 6780 S. 696.
Boscheinen-Duursma, H. C.; Khanyk-Pospolitak, R. Austria and Ukraine Comparative Study of E-Justice: Towards Confidence of Judicial Rights Protection. AJEE – Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. 2019, Issue 4, pp. 42-59.
Bundesgesetz über das gerichtliche Verfahren in Rechtsangelegenheiten außer Streitsachen (Außerstreitgesetz – AußStrG), BGBl. I Nr. 111/2003, NR: GP XXII RV 224 AB 268 S. 38., BR: AB 6895 S. 703.
Code of Civil Procedure [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showDoc/cs/C-25.01?&digest=>.
Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents) {COM(2018) 379 final} - {SEC(2018) 272 final} - {SWD(2018) 286 final} [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/law/contribute_to_law-making/documents/e-codex-main-act-en.pdf and https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0287:FIN:EN:PDF>.
Conventions, protocols and principles [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=17)>.
Conventions, protocols and principles [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=82)>.
Decision of Kremenchutskyi court of Poltava Region [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/25399474>.
Decision of the Amur-Nyzhniodnistrovskyi District Court of Dnipropetrovsk on divorce [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72941304>
Decision of the appellate court, which left the decision unchanged [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/92492968>.
Decision of the City of Vienna on debt collection [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://opendatabot.ua/court/89304954-7bd00e05e9dd2ad81339e6d50ef7ff8d>.
Decision of the appellate court, which left the decision unchanged [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/92492968>.
Decision of the Kyiv District Court of Odesa [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: .
Decision of the Leninskyi district court of Mykolayiv [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/46774690>.
Decision of the Prymorskyi District court of Odesa [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua / Review / 76483970>.
Decision of the Prymorskyi District court of Odesa on divorce and determination of the child’s habitual residence [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/70772349>.
Decision of the Rivne District Court of Rivne region [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/63930918>.
Decision of the Vynohradiv District Court of the Zakarpattia Region [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79642880> and also <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/21520730>.
Decision of the Zhovtnevyi District Court of Zaporizhia [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/93690741>.
Decision of the Zhovtnevyi District Court of Zaporizhia on the recovery of unreasonably acquired funds [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79741330>.
ELI-Unidroit Model Rules of Civil Procedure [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/civil-procedure/eli-unidroit-rules>.
Eur-Lex. Access to European Union Law. Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. 2021. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A22014A0529%2801%29>.
European Commission. ‘Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area between Ukraine and the EU.’ 2021. <http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/ukraine/>.
European Court of Human Rights. ‘Ukraine.’ [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/CP_Ukraine_ENG.pdf>.
European Union. Statistics on European Neighbourhood Policy Countries: East. 2018 edition. 2018. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/9033104/KS-02-18-351-EN-N.pdf/d7ef566c-ba67-4bf4-9b68-5adda18043c3>.
Eurostat. EU-Ukraine international trade in goods statistics.’ 2021. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Ukraine-EU_-_international_trade_in_goods_statistics>.
Federal Act on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Consumer Matters (Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, AStG).
Gesetz vom 1. August 1895, über das gerichtliche Verfahren in bürgerlichen Rechtsstreitigkeiten (Zivilprozessordnung – ZPO), RGBl. Nr. 113/1895.
Gewaltenteilung [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/themen/leben_in_oesterreich/demokratie/1/Seite.320130.html>.
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Doing Business 2020 Ukraine. 2020. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/country/u/ukraine/UKR.pdf>
Іzarova, I. Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions. Teise (Law). 2019, Vol. 111, pp. 234-245. <https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2019.111.14>.
Izarova, I. About the Issue 2-3/2020 ‘Justice Under Covid-19’ AJEE – Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. 2020, Issue 2-3 (7), pp. 4-5.
Izarova, I. Enhancing judicial cooperation in civil matters between the EU and Ukraine: first steps ahead. In: A. Trunk and N. Hatzimihail, eds. EU Civil Procedure Law and Third Countries: Which Way Forward? Germany: Hart Publishing, 2021, pp. 191-212.
Izarova, I.; Nekrošius, V.; Vėbraitė, V.; Prytyka, Yu. Legal, Social and Cultural Prerequisites for the Development of ADR Forms in Lithuania and Ukraine. Teise (Law). 2020, Vol. 116, pp. 8-23. <https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2020.116.1>.
Judgment of the court, case No. 711/9628/19 [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://opendatabot.ua/court/89304954-7bd00e05e9dd2ad81339e6d50ef7ff8d>.
Judgment of the court, case No. 711/9628/19 [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://opendatabot.ua/court/92492967-4f40a37a0f0ce9fad8962937cbb3ce80>.
Korosten City District Court of Zhytomyr region’s decision [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82384714>.
Local court decision [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88558574>.
Mykolayiv District Court of the Lviv Region’s decision [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77891127>.
Prätorischer Vergleich (Vergleich vor dem Bezirksgericht [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/themen/dokumente_und_recht/zivilrecht/1/Seite.1010160.html>.
Prylutskyi S.; Strieltsova O. The Ukrainian Judiciary under 21st-Century Challenges. AJEE – Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. 2020, Issue 2-3 (7), pp. 78-99.
Rechtsgrundlagen [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/themen/familie_und_partnerschaft/scheidung/Seite.100800.html#Rechtsgrundlagen>.
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast).
Richter [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/themen/dokumente_und_recht/strafrecht/3/Seite.2460204.html>.
Rozhnov O. Towards Timely Justice in Civil Matters Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. AJEE – Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. 2020, Issue 2-3 (7), pp. 100-114.
Section 258 para. 1 No. 4 Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO; Austrian Civil Procedure Code), RGBl. Nr. 113/1895.
Section 4(1) of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act (AStG), Federal Law Gazette No. 105/2015.
Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv’s decision [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <(https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86432716>.
Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv’s order [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/69219830>.
Status Table Convention of 1 March 1954 on civil procedure [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=33>.
The Agreement on Civil Procedure of 1970 [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/040_013#Text>.
United Nations, ‘Member States’. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.un.org/en/member-states/>.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Decree of the President of Ukraine ‘On the Sustainable Development Goals of Ukraine until 2030.’ 2021. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/722/2019>.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Law of Ukraine ‘On the Ratification of Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’ concerning the abolition of the death penalty. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1484-14>.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Law of Ukraine. ‘On Social Services’ dated 17 January 2019 No. 2671-VIIIY. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2671-19#Text>
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Order of the Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine dated 17 August 2016 under No. 892 (as amended from 07.08.2017). [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1243-16#Text>.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. The Law of Ukraine ‘On the Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols No. 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention.’ 2021. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-вр>.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. The Law of Ukraine ‘On the Ratification of Protocols No. 15 and No. 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.’ [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2156-19>.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy.’The Law of Ukraine ‘On the Enforcement of Decisions and the Application of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’.’ 2021. [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15>.
Zivilverfahrens-Novelle 2002 [viewed date: 2 May 2021]. Available from: <https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXI/I/I_00962/index.shtml>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
