Features of Applying the Right to Suspension or Complete/ Partial Refusal to Fulfill a Duty in Case of Non-Fulfilment of the Counter Duty by the Other Party According to the Civil Legislation of Ukraine

Authors

  • Yevhen LEHEZA University of Customs and Finance https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-8499
  • Bogdan SHCHERBYNA Candidate of Juridical Sciences (Ph. D.), Assistant of Civil Law Department, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5388-7600
  • Yulia LEHEZA Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of the Civil, Commercial and Environmental Law, Dnipro University of Technology, Ukraine.
  • Olena PUSHKINA Professor, Head of the Department of the Civil, Commercial and Environmental Law, Dnipro University of Technology, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-6210
  • Olesia MARCHENKO Professor at the Department of Civil, Labour and Economic Law, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University.

Keywords:

obligations, counter duties, refusal to fulfill, suspension of fulfillment, property rights.

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to determine the scope and mechanism of applying the creditor’s right to suspension or partial/complete refusal to perform a duty in case of non-fulfilment of the counter duty by the debtor (obligations the specified right is applied to and the mechanism of its implementation).  Main content. The legal nature of the right to suspension or complete/partial refusal to fulfil a duty has been clarified: the author concluded that this is a way to protect civil rights and interests. Attention is drawn to the fact that the studied right can be applied in case of non-fulfilment of a negative obligation by the other party. Conclusions. The right to suspension or refusal to fulfil a duty shall be applied to obligations when their fulfilment is not simultaneous, but a certain procedure for performing parties’ duties is provided for. This right can be applied in case of other party’s non-fulfilment of its main duty within the obligation, non-fulfilment of an auxiliary duty does not entitle the other party to suspend or refuse its duty.

References

BARANOVA, Liudmyla Mykolaivna. The Civil Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary. Volume 7. General provisions on obligations and the contract. 2012. Kharkiv. Stride. Ukraine.

BUHA, Volodymyr. IAKUBIN, Oleksii. MAZUR, Tamara. REZVOROVICH Kristina, DARAGANOVA. Nina. Legal regulation of the institute of control in the field of housing construction in the conditions of armed aggression of the Russian Federation. Cuestiones Políticas. Jul-Dic2022. 2022. Vol. 40 Issue 73, 151-171. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.07.

HALABURDA, Nadiia. LEHEZA, Yevhen, CHALAVAN, Viktor. YEFIMOV, Volodymyr. YEFIMOVA, Inna. Compliance with the principle of the rule of law in guarantees of ensuring the legality of providing public services in Ukraine. Journal of law and political sciences. 2021. Vol. 29, Іssue 4, 100-121.

CLARENCE D. Ashley. The doctrine of consideration Harvard Law Review, 1913. Vol. 26, No. 5, 429-436. Available online. In https://www.jstor.org/stable/1063252?seq=1 Consultation date: 23/01/2023

DZERA, Oleksandr Vasylovych. KUZNIETSOVA, Nataliia Semenivna. Civil law of Ukraine. A special part. 2018. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, Ukraine.

HAVZE, Faivel Ysaakovych. Obligation law (general provisions). 1968. Minsk: From BSU im. V.I. Lenin, Belarus.

JENKS, Edward. The History of the Doctrine of Consideration in English Law. 1892. London, Great Britain.

KOLINKO, Tsahik. REZVOROVYCH, Krystyna. YUNINA, Maryna. 2019. Legal characteristic of the franchise agreement in Germany. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 96-100. DOI https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-1-96-100

LEHEZA, Yevhen. DOROKHINA, Yuliia. SHAMARA, Oleksandr. MIROSHNYCHENKO, Serhii. MOROZ, Vita. Citizens ‘participation in the fight against criminal offences: political and legal aspects. Cuestiones Políticas. 2021. Vol. 39, No. 69, pp. 212-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.12

LEHEZA, Yevhen. FILIPENKO, Tatiana. SOKOLENKO, Olha. DARAHAN, Valeri. KUCHERENKO, Oleksii. Ensuring human rights in ukraine: problematic issues and ways of their solution in the social and legal sphere. Cuestiones políticas. 2020. Vol. 37 № 64 (enero-junio 2020). pp. 123-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3764.10

LEHEZA, Yevhen. Illegal influence on the results of sports competitions: comparison with foreign legislation. Ratio Juris UNAULA, 2022. 17(34), pp. 53-70. Available online. In https://publicaciones.unaula.edu.co/index.php/ratiojuris/article/view/1338 Consultation date: 20/01/2023

LEHEZA, Yevhen. SHAMARA, Oleksandr. CHALAVAN, Viktor. Principios del poder judicial administrativo en Ucrania. DIXI, 2022. 24(1), pp. 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.08

LEHEZA, Yevhen. YERKO, Iryna. KOLOMIICHUK, Viacheslav. LISNIAK, Mariia. International Legal And Administrative-Criminal Regulation Of Service Relations. Jurnal cita hukum indonesian law journal. 2022. Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 49-60, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v10i1.25808

LEHEZA, Yevhen. PISOTSKA, Karina. DUBENKO, Oleksandr. DAKHNO, Oleksandr. SOTSKYI, Artur. The Essence of the Principles of Ukrainian Law in Modern Jurisprudence. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 2022. December, 342-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(32)2022.ic-15

LIUTIKOV, Pavlo. SHEVCHENKO, Mykhailo. PRYIMACHENKO, Dmytro. Judicial review of the exercise of discretionary powers: case-law of european court of human rights and experience from Ukraine. Journal of law and political sciences. 2021. Vol. 26. Issue. 1. P. 400-425.

MATVIICHUK, Anatolii. SHCHERBAK, Viktor. SIRKO, Viktoria. MALIEIEVA, Hanna. LEHEZA, Yevhen. Human principles of law as a universal normative framework: Principios humanos del derecho como marco normativo universal. Cuestiones Políticas, 2022. 40(75), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.14

NADON, Viktoriia Valentynivna. Subjective duty as an element of the content of civil legal relations. 2017. Kharkiv: Pravo. Ukraine.

NOVYTSKYI, Yvan Borysovych. The general doctrine of obligations. 1950. Moscow. Legal Literature. USSR.

RESOLUTION dated April 1, 2020 in case No. 910/1102/20. 2020. Cassation Commercial Court of the Supreme Court. Available online. In http://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?regnum=96172747&red=10000376b47e3bd887c3198bd21a19f26f1fa0&d=5 Consultation date: 20/01/2023

RESOLUTION dated September 2, 2020 in case No. 757/12906/19-ts. Kyiv Court of Appeal. Available online. In https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/84536731 Consultation date: 22/01/2023

TSYBAN, Artem Andriiovych. Subjective civil duty as an element of a binding legal relationship: dissertation. to obtain a scientific degree of a candidate of legal faculties. 2018. Kharkiv. Ukraine.

VILLASMIL ESPINOZA, Jorge; LEHEZA, Yevhen; HOLOVII, Liudmyla. 2022. Reflections for the interdisciplinary study of the Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022: Reflexiones para el estudio interdisciplinario de la invasión de Ucrania por parte de la Federación Rusa en 2022. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(73), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.00

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

LEHEZA, Y., Bogdan SHCHERBYNA, Yulia LEHEZA, Olena PUSHKINA, & Olesia MARCHENKO. (2023). Features of Applying the Right to Suspension or Complete/ Partial Refusal to Fulfill a Duty in Case of Non-Fulfilment of the Counter Duty by the Other Party According to the Civil Legislation of Ukraine. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 340–359. Retrieved from https://revistas.rcaap.pt/juridica/article/view/29662

Issue

Revista Jurídica Portucalense - Nº Especial (2023) - Mechanisms of Legal Protection in Civil Law

Section

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Portucalense

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. The Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
     

RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of ​​Legal Sciences.