Judicial Control on “Internal Corporal Acts”: Case of the Right Action of Inconstitutionality 6524 In the Light of the Exception of the Political Nature of Rui Barbosa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-07Keywords:
Exception Political nature of the cause; Insolvency of internal corporate acts; Art. 57, §4, of the Constitution; Constitutional projection; Exercise of constitutional jurisdiction.Abstract
The article aims to carry out an analysis of the judgment of Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 6,524 by the Supreme Federal Court in relation to the thesis of the exception of the political nature of the cause defended by Rui Barbosa, in order to identify the relevance of the respective teachings. Therefore, the analysis will aim to compare the judgment of Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 6,524 and Rui Barbosa's lessons on the constitutional exception. This is bibliographic and documentary research. The hypothesis is that the control of purely political acts is possible, as long as they keep projection in the text of the Constitution. The conclusion of the research was that the judgment of ADI 6,524 is in line with the thesis of political nature and its consequences, especially under the political role played by the Supreme Court.
References
BARAK, Aharon. International Humanitarian Law and the Israeli Supreme Court. Israel Law Review, [S.L.], v. 47, n. 2, p. 181-189, 6 jun. 2014. Cambridge University Press (CUP). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021223714000041.
BERCOVICI, Gilberto. Soberania e Constituição: Para uma Crítica do Constitucionalismo. 2 ed. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2013.
BRASIL, Império do. Constituição Política do Império do Brasil, de 24 de março de 1824. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 1998. p. 811- 871.
BRASIL. República Federativa do. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, Centro Gráfico, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 6524. Partido Trabalhista Brasileiro. Relator: Ministro Gilmar Mendes, Brasília, DF, 14 de dezembro de 2020. Disponível em: http://redir.stf.jus.br/estfvisualizadorpub/jsp/consultarprocesso eletronico/ConsultarProcessoEletronico.jsf?seqobjetoincidente=5972250.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Mandado de Segurança nº 34327. Eduardo Cosentino da Cunha. Relator: Ministro Roberto Barroso. Brasília, DF, 08 de setembro de 2016. Disponível em: https://jurisprudencia.stf.jus.br/pages/search/sjur428026/false.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Tribunal Pleno. Agravo Regimental no Mandado de Segurança nº 36817. Glauber de Medeiros Braga e Outros. Relator: Ministro Luiz Fux. Brasília, DF, 25 de maio de 2020. Disponível em: https://jurisprudencia.stf.jus.br/pages/search/sjur370659/false.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Impeachment: Jurisprudência. Brasília: Imprensa Nacional, 1995.
BARBOSA, Rui. Obras Completas. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Casa de Rui Barbosa, 1942/1999. Disponível em: http://www.stf.jus.br/bibliotecadigital/ RuiBarbosa/6055_V24_T2/PDF/6055_V24_T2.pdf.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Interpretação e aplicação da Constituição: fundamentos de uma dogmática constitucional transformadora. 7 ed. rev. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009.
CONTINENTINO, Marcelo Casseb. História do Controle da Constitucionalidade das Leis no Brasil. Percursos do Pensamento Constitucional no Século XIX (1824-1891). São Paulo: Editora Almedina Brasil, 2015.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Levando os Direitos a Sério. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.
HIRSCHL, Ran. The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts. Annual Review of Political Science, [S.L.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 93-118, jun. 2008. Annual Reviews. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906. Disponível em: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906.
HIRSCHL, Ran. Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. United States of America: Harvard University, 2004.
MEIRELES, Hely Lopes. Direito Administrativo Brasileiro. 15 ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1990.
OLIVEIRA, Cláudio Ladeira de. Ativismo Judicial, Autorrestrição Judicial e o “Minimalismo” de Cass Sunstein. Diritto & Diritti, [s. l], v. 1, p. 1-21, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.diritto.it/pdf_archive/27004.pdf.
ROWE, L.S.. The Supreme Court and the Insular Cases. The Annals of the American Academy of Political And Social Science, [S.L.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 38-62, set. 1901. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271620101800202. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1010370.pdf.
SCHMITT, Carl. Interpretación Europea de Donoso Cortés. Buenos Aires: Editorial Truhart 7 Cia., 2006.
STRECK, Lenio. Jurisdição Constitucional e Hermenêutica – Uma Nova Crítica do Direito. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2004.
VIANNA, Francisco José de Oliveira. O Ocaso do Império. 3 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympio Editora, 1959.
VIEIRA, Oscar Vilhena. Supremocracia. Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, v. 4, n. 2, p. 441-463, jul./dez. 2008. Disponível em: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php /revdireitogv/article /view/35159/33964.
WALDRON, Jeremy. The Core of the Case against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, [S.L.], v. 115, n. 6, p. 1346, 1 abr. 2006. JSTOR. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20455656.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Jurídica Portucalense
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
